#for rphs

[saphinc]

Also, @ pet peeve nonnie anon: I agree. For not the same reason, but. 'Nona' is like... 'miss' (or 'young lady', 'girl' etc) in Indonesian, and the older women in my family always called the girls that (also shortened to just 'non'). So... 'non' and variations of it is very, VERY gendered to me. So if ever I go on anon for whatever reason, and I'm referred to as 'non' or variations, it feels bad, man. Like in my POV that's... straight up misgendering, even if the person in question doesn't know.

post in reference !!!!

[saphinc]

I check out their wid and previous responses to others! If they're super nice in answers and give thorough responses, I go to them first.

how do you decide which rph blog to reach out to ?

[saphinc]

For advice or help, definitely who seems friendly and receptive. There are a some blogs whose firm "don't" language is honestly more rude than firm, and I'd never go to them for more than a shoutout.

how do you decide which rph blog to reach out to ?

[saphinc]

I'm tired of seeing alt fc lists/etc. for "problematic" FCs that do not touch on the problematic behavior the FC does. I've come across too many list that seem to assume that the person looking at the list already knows what an FC has done (which isn't often the case) so it's a missed educating moment and it's good practice to say /why/ someone's being called out so people make an informed decision for themselves & aren't forming an opinion strictly on just someone saying they're "problematic".

what rpc trend needs to end ?