Hello, all! Welcome back to Sonia Speaking, a blog about cinematic storytelling. I’m continuing my series on Memento’s screenplay and why it is so incredibly effective. Today, we’re going to discuss the second sequence. The second sequence (hereafter referred to as “Sequence 2”) generally runs from the Inciting Incident (usually around page 15) to the Act One Break (usually around page 30). These first thirty pages are essential to get right! The brutal truth is that many readers (producers, coverage writers, etc) will pass on your script if something dramatic and interesting does not happen by page 10.
A quick recap: by page 15 of Memento, we see the actual moment that Leonard has decided to kill Teddy. Now, the way Memento contextualizes its inciting incident is interesting because we technically have already seen Leonard make this decision in the opening scene. However, what the inciting incident gives us is the empirical reason Leonard decides to kill Teddy: that infamous tattoo that says, “John G raped and murdered my wife.” The primary goal of Sequence 2 is to move the protagonist from the inciting incident into a psychological position where the protagonist is fully locked into their journey by the Act One Break. The secondary goals of Sequence 2 is to layer in other characters and provide foreshadowing into the future obstacles and complications to be encountered by the protagonist.
The real challenge of Sequence 2 is to create that deepening sense of thematic resonance. Memento is ultimately a study in ideas about the individual’s (in)significance and the visible and invisible consequences of our actions. On the surface, Leonard is a very “cool” character who has ingeniously figured out a system to work around his handicap. But underneath, he is a tortured man who is steadfastly holding onto his belief that he matters. Because he knows that if he loses that belief, he is and will become utterly nothing:
LEONARD The world doesn’t disappear when you close your eyes, does it? My actions still have meaning, even if I can’t remember them. My wife deserves vengeance and it doesn’t make any difference whether I know about it.
Sequence 2 is the spot to place the thesis statement for your screenplay. What is the larger, grander statement your narrative is trying to make about humanity and our shortcomings? Not only that, but it is essential that this thesis statement is inherently tied into your protagonist’s personality and development arc. It is one thing to include a thesis statement. But without the direct connection to your protagonist’s core and essence, it will not feel organic and cohesive.
Another important goal of Sequence 2 is to layer in sub-plots and introduce other characters who foreshadow Act 2 obstacles. During Sequence 2, we meet Natalie (who will become a major player soon enough). But the other important character we meet is Sammy Jankis, through the black-and-white scenes that provide insight into Leonard prior to his wife’s murder. Sammy is a fascinating character because he serves as Leonard’s foil. A “foil” is a character with contrasting qualities to highlight specific themes and the protagonist’s development. Sammy had the same condition as Leonard, but was unable to maintain a system for remembering. In this sub-plot, past-Leonard’s goal is to determine Sammy’s condition as valid or false.
Ultimately, the most prominent goal of Sequence 2 is to psychologically position your protagonist so that they are completely and utterly committed to their journey by the Act One Break. Like every moment of the screenplay, this needs to be a choice made in the face of imminent danger (both physical and psychological danger). Take a look at what happens on page 29-30 of Memento:
TEDDY Leonard, you need to be careful.
LEONARD Why?
TEDDY The other day you made it sound like you thought somebody might be trying to set you up.
LEONARD Yeah, well I go on facts, not recommendations, okay?
TEDDY Lenny, you can’t trust a man’s life to your little notes and pictures.
LEONARD Why?
TEDDY Because you’re relying on them alone. You don’t remember what you’ve discovered or how. Your notes might be unreliable.
LEONARD Memory’s unreliable.
Teddy snorts.
LEONARD No, really. Memory’s not perfect. It’s not even that good. Ask the police, eyewitness testimony is unreliable. The cops don’t catch a killer by sitting around remembering stuff. They collect facts, make notes, draw conclusions. Facts, not memories; that’s how you investigate. I know, it’s what I used to do. Memory can change the shape of a room or the color of a car. It’s an interpretation, not a record. Memories can be changed or distorted and they’re irrelevant if you have the facts.
TEDDY You really want to find this guy?
LEONARD he took away the woman I love and he took away my memory. He destroyed everything; my life and my ability to live.
TEDDY You’re living.
LEONARD Just for revenge. That’s what keeps me going. It’s all I have.
This is incredible screenwriting because the essence of Leonard’s character (which was established from page 1) consistently carries through from one moment to the next. Here, he has completely committed to his journey, as if there was any question of that. Even with the danger of a potential set-up and even after being implicitly offered the choice to leave this behind, he commits because that is who he is.
Thank you for reading and please leave comments for discussion. Check back here next week for a post about Sequence 3.











