I have to disagree with your with your criticism about HOTD's Oedipal Complex with Aemond. As much as it's disgusting it also makes absolute sense. Even in the book, the fact that Aemond grown closes to a woman that looks to be his mother's age and the similarity between the names Alys/Alicent is certainly not a coincidence. The plot itself might be a little convoluted but sometimes art it's meant to unnerve us. Accusing Ryan Condal of having a mommy fetish is also quite disgusting. What does that make of GRRM? He wrote pretty disturbing scenes in his books. What does tha make of you? You're literally writing incest fanfics. I don't think it reflects on the person you are.
Respectfully, because I love your work.
I think you're misunderstanding the criticism.
First, let's address the book stuff.
Alys Rivers was at least forty years of age during the Dance of the Dragons, that much is known; Mushroom makes her even older. All agree that she looked younger than her years, but whether this was simple happenstance, or achieved through her practice of the dark arts, men continue to dispute.
GRRM, F&B
In the books, Alys was said to look younger than she actually was. We get tacit hints that she's probably a witch, and that she may have been using glamours to conceal her age, and possibly work the men around her.
Whatever her powers, it would seem Daemon Targaryen was immune to them.
GRRM, F&B
So again, potential hint that she tried her game on Daemon, failed, and then moved on to a younger, more vulnerable target which she could more easily control. Which opens up the possibility that Aemond didn't go for her purely cause she was an older 'milf', but because she was directly playing him. and using her magic to reinforce her control. (You can make parallels to Melisandre/Stannis)
Like this guy became utterly obsessed with her, to the point where he refused to leave Harrenhal when Criston suggested it, and potentially even married her, despite her bastard status and despite him already being betrothed.
Now, that's not to say he was the innocent victim in this. Book Aemond is a vile, misogynistic ego maniac who exterminated her family, and took her as a prize of war (read: sex slave) likely because he wanted to sexually humiliate a bastard of a house he despised. Its just that she might have potentially turned the tables on him, and made the best of her situation to secure power for herself.
Did she play on his mommy issues? Possibly, we don't know. All we have to substantiate the mommy angle is her being a wet nurse, and an older woman (who looked younger than her age). We don't get any information about Aemond's character in relation to women (beyond him choosing the prettiest of Lord Borros' daughters), or his relationship with Alicent, or his previous sexual partners to know for sure that he actually preferred older women because he was Oedipal toward his mother.
And precisely because of this ambiguity, I actually don't mind the mommy issues they gave him on the show (fml, if you've read my fic, Daughters of the Dragon, you know he has major mommy issues there as well). The issue is their handling which is to say, they were reduced to cheap, sexually titillating shock value rather than a meaningful facet of his character that serves to further develop him and advance the plot.
First, they weren't set up properly. S1 was rushed as all hell, meaning we never got to properly develop any of the kids and their relationships with their family, and how that shaped them into adulthood.
S1 Aemond's personality was bullied kid who felt inferior cause he didn't have a dragon, got a dragon and turned himself into a badass edgelord fueled by resentment. The framing tells us this insecurity stems from his second son syndrome and the trauma his brother and nephews put him through (chiefly Luke slashing his eye), not Alicent's parenting specifically (like it so clearly is w Aegon, who is routinely belittled, verbally, emotionally and physically abused on screen. Which in turn, manifests in his alcoholism, and promiscuity, a desperate need for love and approval; one of the most common ways mommy issues show up in adults)
The fandom often views him as a parentified child, but this is an extrapolation gotten from one scene; Aemond comforting Alicent at Driftmark, and managing her feelings, rather than her doing it to him.
That's it. We don't get to explore their dynamic as a family unit (Alicent and all her children) as well as their individual bonds with each other, and with her. We don't get to see the the impact being parentified has on him, Alicent's inconsistent, or even authoritarian care, the blurring of familial boundaries.
Instead, they barely interact and the season kinda sorta sets up the potential for Helaena/Aemond, with both he actors and some of the directors playing into this (possibly tying Aemond's desire for his sister to his jealousy of his older brother and his status)
Fast forward to s2, and now you have him lying naked in the fetal position in the arms of a much older prostitute; the same prostitute who mind you, was paid to SA him at 13. S1 established he hadn't seen her in a while, and was uncomfortable around her, only for his s2 to jump into a full blown mom-baby cosplay with the show implies has been going on for a while. Why? Why did he seek her out? What is the purpose of him going to seek comfort from a woman who was essentially paid to assault him?
We don't know. Because Ryan never showed the start of this relationship. Now as an observant fan, you can infer that this happened cause he and Alicent had a fight over Luke, and he basically lost her as a support system, which in turn prompted him to seek out an older woman substitute. But that's just it; this is an inference. A headcannon Ryan never properly established on screen. We not only never got to see the fight post Luke's death, we also never got to see the depth of Aemond and Alicent's bond to understand why her spurning him would send him to spiral so badly he would seek comfort from someone who abused him. (You can read about why this is an issue here and here)
Aemond spends the first half of s2 as a random NPC who doesn't interact with his family, has no reaction to the death of his nephew (who mind you, was killed in retaliation for his murder), before rapidly transforming into his book self within the span of a single episode; a cartoonish, ego maniacal edgelord whose personality is 'I got a big dragon' (s2ep6 self is the closest he ever got to Book Aemond).
He dismisses Alicent from the council because she's his 'kryptonite' who would cloud his judgement; except this is a BTS comment from Ewan Mitchell, not something we see on screen. On screen, it just looks like he's dismissing her cause she's an idiot who keeps advocating for peace and dickriding their enemy in the middle of a war. (And cause he's angry with her cause she blames him for starting the war)
Which brings me to s3 (finally). Again, what is the point of Alicent and Aemond's kiss, and the sex scene? Genuinely? To show he's fucked up and has mommy issues? Yeah, makes sense, that scene of him lying fetal in s2 wasn't enough, we really needed to have him outright fuck his mom for people to get it.
To show how incest is bad and how it leads to the breakdown of familial relationships? Okay, gotta wonder why Ryan didn't meaningfully set this up, showed how the blurring of boundaries gradually led Aemond to think this is completely fine. And I can hear you saying "Oh, ofc he'd think it's natural, the Targs practice incest!". They practice lateral incest; between siblings, cousins, aunts, uncles etc, for the specific purpose of maintaining their dragon blood.
Parent/child incest has always been a taboo, even among them, so there's no excuse that Aemond just naturally assumed this would be okay; especially because his Mother is a Hightower, not a Targaryen, raised religious, and very anti incest (she only married Aegon to Helaena cause of politics).
(A good fanfic that tackled this issue in a far better way was the now deleted Family Tree. It unabashedly showed the impact incest has on a child, how it shapes their view of relationships, both familial and romantic. Not to mention that it skillfully showed how abuse and neglect intersect with the incest, even in cases where said incest was supposedly 'consensual'. And it was set up from the very first line, and consistently developed across multiple chapters)
For more info about why the mommy issues angle doesnt work, please see these posts here and here.
No, these scenes are here for the same reason we saw Daemon eat out Alyssa last season: shock value. That's it. Neither of these scenes tell us anything meaningful about these characters beyond Aemond is fucked up and has mommy issues and Daemon is fucked up and wants approval; as if we didn't spend seasons getting slapped over the head with this very information.
And thats why I take issue with it. Granted, I did take it too far by calling it a mommy fetish fanfic, and I take responsibility for it. Regardless, it doesn't alter the fact that the show has been portraying abuse and SA in horrible ways that do absolutely nothing for the plot. ASOIAF has incest and gratuitous violence as well, and while I have my fair share of gripes w how George handled these topics in many respects, I understand why they were included in certain contexts. (To avoid repeating myself, I'll just drop this answer where I go into detail about the narrative purpose of incest in ASOIAF)
This isn't it. It serves no meaningful purpose other than shock value in an empty, inconsistent story that's simultaneously dragging and speed running toward a predetermined conclusion.
A Character Study: Aemond from House of the Dragon
Almost 4k words. My thoughts on Aemond Targaryen. This is me trying to make sense of his character and guessing his motivations. I'm focusing mainly on the show so I did not mention Daeron.
To the greens, Aemond was the spare. To the blacks, he was even less than that.
In the show, he was born after The Green Dress stunt at Rhaenyra's wedding, when Alicent got rid of her Targaryen red and black dresses in favor of Hightower green, signaling her true allegiance. Sides are declared. The die is cast. In the book, Alicent's stunt wouldn't be pulled until a year after Aemond was born, but I like the show's timing better.
I like the idea of Alicent being in full-on war mode while she was pregnant with him. It would be fitting, knowing she would give birth to a baby boy with a choleric temperament. The boy who would one day grow up to be the young man whose actions started the Dance of the Dragons.
Aemond as might as well pull an Athena and come out of the womb fully dressed in armor and ready for war.
From the time Aemond was old enough to understand, the tension between his mother and half-sister had been so thick that you could cut it with a knife.
In the show, Aemond and Jace are roughly the same age, so Jace was probably born not long after Aemond (I'm guessing their age difference is a year max). Then Rhaenyra churns out two more bastard kids throughout the duration of Aemond's youth. Growing up, this boy would’ve been mighty familiar with hearing questions about his nephews' legitimacy as more and more rumors of Rhaenyra's trysts with Harwin Strong spread throughout King's Landing.
To properly understand Aemond's childhood, we need to talk about Aemond's momma, Alicent Hightower. Mommy dearest.
Alicent was literally a teen mom who had been forced to grow up too quickly. After Viserys fired Otto and her friendship with Rhaenyra disintegrated, she had almost zero allies in court. She was scared, paranoid, and bitter. Alicent was nowhere near prepared for the motherhood and queenship that was thrust upon her. I'm pretty sure that she often found herself needing someone to vent to, and I think Aemond would've been that someone for her (My Son is My Therapist).
Alicent was, by definition, an emotionally immature parent. In this scenario, it’s common for parents to turn to their children for emotional support. She couldn’t turn to Viserys, Aegon was rowdy and does his own shit, and she and Helaena never quite connected. That left Aemond, who strikes me as a naturally attentive and observant child.
This is just a theory, but I don’t see why it couldn’t have happened given the circumstances. It would certainly explain why Aemond and his mom are so close. (And why Aemond gives "older sibling who acts like a parent" vibes.)
I mean, have you seen this scene? The softness they have for each other? How in tune they are with each other’s emotions? They act more like equals than Mother and Son.
With Viserys being a shitty father who'd rather play with his legos than pay attention to his son, Alicent would also be the only person Aemond would look to for guidance, to make sense of the world.
I'm imagining Alicent ranting about Rhaenyra's irresponsibility while a young Aemond listens, absorbing every word.
Here I am, upholding the kingdom, the family, the law, while she flouts it all to do as she pleases.
The audacity of her to name her common-faced bastards as heirs while you and Aegon are pushed further down the line of succession.
Where is duty? Where is honor? Where is sacrifice?
It’s a wonder to me that her sons’ eggs ever hatched. We all know what they really are.
Aemond takes Alicent's words to heart and he treats them with a level of seriousness that is rare for most children his age. He strikes me as a very precocious kid. I see him as an overthinker, which would mean he has a tendency to mull over things for long periods of time and find deeper meanings where most would fail to. (A trait that would serve him but ultimately destroy him in the end.)
Like the good student he is, Aemond takes in everything that Alicent has to say. And if my My Son is My Therapist theory is correct, then out of all of Alicent’s children, Aemond would be the one most privy to her thoughts. It would explain why he's so similar to her in beliefs and personality. Everything he knew, he learned from Alicent.
Helaemond shippers like to point at this scene and say Aemond had a crush on Helaena and idk about you but it sounds like he's just echoing his mother. This is a 10-year-old boy.
Thanks to Alicent, Aemond would see the world as being split into two groups: the “worthy” and the “unworthy”. The worthy are the ones who uphold honor and duty. The unworthy are the ones who do not.
His sense of worth would be directly tied to this metric. Aemond has a strong desire to prove himself worthy by being the perfect prince, the perfect son. He cares deeply about how others views him, and he becomes a perfectionist.
Aegon being a useless drunkard and Rhaenyra being a lawbreaker would only motivate him further. (Yes, Rhaenyra naming her bastards as heirs is literally illegal. It's high treason. It's an offense that would result in being disinherited and even executed, I can't stress this enough.) I can do better, Aemond thinks.
So, being the only boy in the family without a dragon would do monumental damage to his self-esteem.
I'm imagining him listening to Alicent rant about how Jacaerys and Lucerys are unworthy of having their dragon eggs hatch. Being the over-analytical little shit he is, Aemond would've come to the conclusion that the eggs only hatch for true Targaryens. And suddenly he's worried because what if I'm not worthy of my name?
Even my idiot older brother and my bastard nephews have dragons. What does that make me? He thinks. Aemond would've felt so small.
As if it wasn't bad enough to know that he was only the spare to Aegon's heir, to watch his father neglect him while pouring affection to his half-sister and her kids, to know that he was the least important member of the family. (Knowing you're not the favorite child hurts even for normal people; imagine growing up in a family system where every child is ranked from most important to least.)
It sure didn't help that Aegon, Jace, and Lucerys took advantage of his biggest insecurity to bully him.
Now, we don't know exactly when this bullying started or how long it had been going on, but the Pink Dread incident was nowhere near the first time. To find a pig and to attach wigs on it takes a bit more effort than your average taunts. There's a lot that has to build up for that to happen. I'm guessing the bullying had been going for a few years.
But the pig was definitely the crescendo. With each taunt and sneer the boys had thrown at him, Aemond's self-esteem had gotten worse and worse. When the Pink Dread happens, something in Aemond snaps.
It was more than just a pig with wings. It was utter humiliation. It was telling him no matter how perfect you try to be, you will always be lesser.
Knowing this and all the pent-up anger that Aemond would have towards his brother and the Velaryon/Strong boys, it probably took him a lot of self-control to not explode right there and then.
In Fire and Blood, Aemond is described as being a feisty kid.
"Aemond was said to be half the size of his elder brother but twice as fierce."
In the show, he's more chill, but I don't think the book is wrong. F&B is written like a history book, and history only remembers what was notable. Aemond has this sort of vibe that says "I'm chill on the outside but I'm screaming on the inside." Like his mother, he holds in all his feelings for the sake of appearances but you can bet that during the times when he does let it out, this boy would have an anger that burns hotter than the seven hells. And it would be enough to give him a reputation.
Aemond tries to be on his best behavior and bottles up his emotions... until he can't anymore. Being a perfectionist, he has a do-or-die mentality. This aspect of him was ever so apparent when he sees Vhagar at Laena's funeral.
The oldest, largest, and most dangerous dragon in the world... out in the open, without a rider. And one desperate boy who has had enough of feeling weak and inferior.
Hell, it was like dangling a carrot in front of a rabbit.
This is my one and only chance, Aemond thinks. My brother and my nephews want to laugh at me? Fine, I'm going to claim a dragon that'll make theirs look like a pig.
At this point, Aemond could care less about the dangers. Give me the biggest dragon in the world or give me death.
Vhagar sees Aemond and goes, "This little shit has balls... I like it. But let's see how he does in the air." She tests him by flying like an absolute maniac but when she realizes that Aemond has persevered regardless, she deems him worthy of being her rider. Vhagar likes her riders strong-willed and courageous. Aemond didn't claim Vhagar, Vhagar claimed Aemond.
And that validation from Grandma Dragon was all Aemond needed to go on a freaking power trip. This lonely boy — who had been bullied for years, whose only "friend" was his mother — was suddenly given the highest level of approval from an ancient war dragon who people write songs about. Becoming Vhagar's rider gives him newfound confidence and Aemond feels on top of the world. He's still riding that high when the Strong boys and Daemon's daughters attack him.
It's this same rush of power that makes him utter the forbidden word.
Bastards.
I don't think Aemond actually hates Rhaenyra's boys for being bastards. I mean, look at this scene where he goes up to Jace during Laena's funeral. The look of sympathy. He wants to say something to offer condolences about Ser Harwin's death, but he knows he shouldn't. And the future love of his life is literally a bastard of House Strong.
During the fight, Aemond calls Jace and Luke bastards as a way to get back at them for making him feel weak. He's saying, look who's the inferior one now.
Then Lucerys stabs him in the eye and all the euphoria he felt a few minutes ago goes down the drain.
It only got worse from there.
Instead of giving him sympathy, his half-sister politicizes his trauma, makes the entire thing about her and her sons, and accuses him of treason. His father is angrier over the fact that he called his nephews bastards than the fact that he was maimed. The little shit who took out his eye doesn't even apologize.
And where had his useless older brother been all this time? Drunk beyond repair.
The only one who seems to care is his mother, and Aemond watches as she gets excessively gaslit for wanting justice on his behalf.
He's sitting there in the armchair while all this goes down, one of his eyes is literally gone, and his injury is probably so painful that his head feels like it's going to burst.
I let my feelings get ahead of me one time and this is what happens, Aemond thinks.
Any other kid in his position would've felt entitled to act out, but Aemond swallows down his emotions and puts on a brave face. He protects his mother from his father's wrath and even steps in to defuse the situation by placating her. Mommy's little therapist.
This ten-year-old boy was forced to take on the role of an adult while his eye had been freshly slashed from his skull. The trauma of that night would stay with him for years afterward.
Three things were certain in Aemond's mind:
He can't count on his father to defend him.
He can't count on his older brother to defend him.
His half-sister cares more about the throne than his safety and most likely his life.
When the family returns to Kings Landing the next day, Aemond leaves his childhood behind at Driftmark.
He develops hyper-independence and spends the next several years trying to compensate for his disability while preparing for the Targaryen Hunger Games that will come one day. Aemond would be the first one up at dawn, already in the training yard, and he'd be the last one to retreat to his chambers at night, reading page after page in the library and sometimes even falling asleep there.
Well, okay, maybe he's not exactly the last one to bed.
I'm imagining pre-teen Aemond coming out of the library at the hour of the owl, only to bump into a staggering teenage Aegon who was just sneaking back into the Red Keep after a late-night rendezvous, high as a kite.
This is the idiot who is to be king, Aemond thinks. (Rhaenyra's gang can delude themselves as much as they'd like but Aemond knows the precedent set by the Great Council of 101 AC, the primogeniture, was bigger than the wishes of a dying king and an entitled princess.)
No matter how hard he tries, his clown of a brother would always get what Aemond had always been more qualified for.
Because Aemond was only the second son.
Worse, a second son with just one eye.
Aemond's quite insecure about his looks; I'm sure he thinks his scar looks ugly and horrifying. It's canon that he wears the eyepatch to not frighten the ladies. The sapphire is there so he looks cool when he does want to frighten them.
I don't think he would've had a lot of crushes. Not because he doesn't care about romance or sex, I think it would be because he's scared of getting rejected. He hears the court calling him Aemond One-Eye and people whispering about his fiery temper behind his back. As a side effect of that traumatic day in Driftmark, I think Aemond would now anger quite easily, as trauma survivors often do. And when he isn't angry, he's putting on a stone mask of confidence to seem indestructible. It would definitely come off quite cold to others, but after all the helplessness he had felt, Aemond adopts the "I'd rather be feared than loved" mentality.
He knows he's not crush-worthy material (don't fight me on this, it's different for fandom girlies because we know his story, but imagine if you didn't and you met him in real life, only knowing him based on the rumors? and, while I think ewan mitchell is handsome af, he's not conventionally pretty.).
I have other things to do than think about girls, he tells himself.
Then Aegon takes him to a brothel on the Streets of Silk on his thirteenth birthday. His older brother basically rapes him by proxy via a woman who is twice Aemond's age. (We don't know if this trauma did anything to affect Aemond's sexual preferences but we do know that teenage Aemond would never look at girls his own age. He falls in love with Alys Rivers... who's like 40. Aemond also has mommy issues so there's that.)
When Aegon marries Helaena, Aemond does his best to protect his sister from his brother's abuse because he knows what it's like. Both being victims of Aegon, he forms a special bond with Helaena and takes on the role of being her protector. This protectiveness he feels is extended down to Helaena's children.
A few years go by and Aemond settles into a routine that consists of him picking up after his brother, taking care of his sister and her children, being a confidant to his mother, and essentially taking the position of the family patriarch. On top of this, he has a rigorous training regimen and he's studying everything he can about history and political philosophy so that at least someone will know shit about ruling when Aegon becomes king.
This boy had so much on his plate.
Eventually, the matter of Driftmark's succession brings Rhaenyra's clan back to court. Bro definitely had flashbacks when he heard the news that they were coming. During the petitions scene, he's tense and on guard. He's trying to act like seeing Rhaenyra and her kids doesn't bother him, but his hands are clasped high behind his back as if he's trying to keep it all in.
At this point, it was about more than the loss of his eye. It was about more than just that night. More than the pain of the injury, and more than the phantom pain that he probably still feels occasionally in the place where his eye had been.
(Edited: I found this amazing post explaining that Aemond most likely had chronic pain resulting from nerve damage. So he probably had more than phantom pain. Which makes his trauma ten times worse.)
No, this boy has been hurt mind, body, and soul. He looks at the blacks and he sees all the years of helplessness, loneliness, resentment, anger, and insecurity that he had been through as a result of their actions. (I've said before that Aemond is a ruminator, and ruminators are often the best grudge-holders.)
Daemon beheads Vaemond for saying the same thing he did when he lost his eye, showing absolutely no mercy. Then, during dinner, the little shit who took out his eye had the audacity to laugh at him when he saw a pig.
Aemond's like, y'know what, I've been acting cordial all day for the sake of being respectful but these people don't deserve it. Fuck it.
After Vizzy T dies and Aegon runs off, Aemond volunteers to find the fool. He prides himself in being dutiful and loyal, it's literally his entire sense of identity, and if it means tracking down his idiot of a brother just so the fool could be crowned — so be it.
That doesn't mean he has to be happy about it though. Aemond finds himself alone in the streets of Flea Bottom with Ser Crispy — the man who taught him how to fight, the man who has been there for his family ever since he was born — and decides to take the opportunity to vent and grant himself some much-needed catharsis, if only for a few seconds.
I think all the resentment that he had felt during the last few days finally boiled over when he saw Luke at Storm's End.
There he was, selling himself up for marriage, trying to do what's expected of him even though he probably feels like a puppet on a string — just so Eggy gets to keep his crown. And this boy, this boy who took his eye out, who bullied him, who laughed and never apologized, waltzes in. The same boy who, a few days ago, was named heir to Driftmark, even though he was a bastard and a second son.
Aemond is triggered. He's a trauma victim; his mind immediately reverts back to the state it was in that fateful night in Driftmark. Mentally, he's no longer the dutiful young adult. The helpless little boy in him comes out and he sees red.
"I want you to put out your eye."
My theory is that Aemond had been dreaming about taking Luke's eye as retribution for years. It's pretty common for victims of violence to fantasize about attacking their abusers — it's a defense mechanism to prepare them for violence to come, and in Aemond's case, violence was guaranteed to come. My dude has probably been suffering from intrusive homicidal ideations for while.
The show told the tale from Luke's POV so we see the boy running out the hall after Borros ends the conversation, only for a mean nasty Aemond to chase him on Vhagar. In the book, however, another secondborn decides to stir shit up after Luke leaves the room.
And there it might have ended, but for the girl Maris. The secondborn daughter of Lord Borros, less comely than her sisters, she was angry with Aemond for preferring them to her. "Was it one of your eyes he took, or one of your balls?" Maris asked the prince, in tones sweet as honey. "I am so glad you chose my sister, I want a husband with all his parts."
So what I'm thinking is that Aemond did try to drop his anger when Luke took his leave. But then the girl picks at his insecurity (bro doesn't know shit about girls and he takes everything so seriously, there's no way he could've seen that she was just jealous).
And that was the final straw. The boy who has tried so hard to be perfect loses control. Honestly, this moment has been a long time coming.
Aemond chases Luke on Vhagar to scare him. He wants to make Luke feel as helpless as he did when they were younger. It makes him feel powerful, and after feeling stepped on for so long, he's letting himself enjoy it while giggling like a maniac in the pouring rain.
Vhagar, however, had other plans. I think she sensed his anger and madness, just like Arrax sensed Luke's fear and anxiety. Aemond might've been playing around, but Vhagar had a mind of her own.
Aemond's only friend (who doesn't also double as a mom or a training teacher) is his geriatric dragon, so of course he would be a tad overconfident in their bond. He definitely wasn't planning for Vhagar to dive in for a little snack.
And that's the story of how the lonely boy who tried and tried and tried to be the perfect son went down in history as a kinslayer.
I can't wait to see him in season 2, absolutely wrecked with guilt. And who's going to believe that mean ole Aemond One-Eye never meant to kill Lucerys? Kinslaying is a serious offense in Westeros. Aemond fucks up one time and now he's going to be ostracized for the rest of his life (which isn't too long 💀).
I can't wait to see how his dynamic with Alicent is going to change since he's no longer this golden boy.
I can't wait to see him become absolutely deranged when Blood and Cheese happens. Aemond thinks he knows what guilt feels like? Think again. The guilt of killing Lucerys was only the prologue. With Blood and Cheese, Aemond wouldn't just be losing a nephew, he'd lose his sister too. Helaena becomes a ghost of a person, and Aegon... I think Egg would be so mad at Aemond. The roles between the brothers would suddenly reverse.
Also, I can't wait to see how they'll portray his relationship with Alys Rivers. (I will sue if they make Alys a skinny, young cottage-core girl. Give me an actual middle-aged woman and make her a witchy girlboss with a fire that matches Aemond's. Give me Katie McGrath.) I want to see him meet Alys and be like "Fuck the Baratheon girl, I'm going to hell anyway so I as might as well enjoy life while I can." I want to see the dutiful side of him unravel as his desires get the best of him. I want to see him drunk with power when he becomes Aegon's regent.
HOTD's Alicent, and Why Letting Female Characters be Villainous Matters
I've already ranted about Aegon and Rhaenys here and here, using their characters to highlight how HOTD's writing suffers from inconsistency. And Alicent too, is a victim of this, especially in s1. However, Alicent's spotty characterization isn't just a symptom of poor writing, but the mishandling of the show's themes in service to a predetermined coninclusion.
In light of that, lets tackle the beast that is Show Alicent.
Warning: This is gonna be hella long, so strap in.
EDIT: future me, and holy shit this is more than hella long. To whomever has the stomach to get through this, I salute you.
Book vs Show
In the wake of s2, I've seen people drastically turn on show Alicent, because of her betrayal in the finale. Post after post denigrating her and praising book Alicent, wishing the writers had stuck to her F&B characterization.
Meanwhile, if you go back to pre s2 times, that exact change was praised to hell and back. Book Alicent was called flat and 2D, a caricature of an evil stepmom. Her show self had complexity, righteousness. She was a doe-eyed childbride who had suffered to birth kids to a man thrice her age, kids he didn't care about in the slightest. She deserved sympathy, vindication, support—a lot more than the woman Viserys had married seemingly out of love in the books, and spent his life trying to appease.
I'll admit; I was in this camp. I liked the change, enjoyed the bff dynamic between her and Rhaenyra, and the dramatic potential the show created as a result of the change. Then, as s2 rolled around and the writers simply refused to let this friendship die, I grew to despise it and venerate their book dynamic. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized my issues weren't with the change itself—because it could have absolutely worked, if it had been handled well.
My issue was, as usual, with the trajectory of the writing.
Let me explain.
It's Fine, If a Bit Shoddy
Don't get me wrong: the change in Alicent and Rhaenyra's ages and dynamic definitely trickled down to create the mess we got in s2. However, the issue isn't the change itself, but the lack of consistency and proper character development.
Let's take Alicent and Rhaenyra's first falling out. It happens after s1ep2, after its announced Viserys will be marrying Alicent, not Laena, as he was advised. Rhaenyra is shocked and feels betrayed—which, in and of itself, is a bit wonky.
Alicent has no choice in this matter. Viserys is the King, and he has the ability to pick whoever he wants to marry. At the end of the day, its the girl's Father who can accept or decline, not the girl. And Otto has no reason to decline cause his House would be elevated to great heights if he makes his daughter Queen.
The only reason Rhaenyra would have to feel angry at Alicent is because Alicent was spending time with Vizzy behind her back—which she never learns. The ep ends on Vizzy announcing the marriage and that's it.
If I remember correctly, there were several deleted scenes of Rhaenyra and Alicent arguing over the marriage, and then an entire Alicent/Vizzy wedding that was also cut. Which honestly, should have been included, at least to clear the air, and flesh out the conflict more, especially Rhaenyra's feelings about it. Cause she is aware of the limited options women have in this world. So her displacing her anger on Alicent is irrational, cause she was just following her father's and King's orders. Which, in and of itself, could be an excellent character flaw. But the issue is, we're not allowed to sit in it, nor are we allowed to see Rhaenyra grow out of it.
The next ep, she's pissed more at Aegon's existence and has alienated Alicent as a result. And we know it's about Aegon cause she says it in the same episode.
Because you mean to replace me! With Alicent Hightower's son; the boy you've always wanted. You have him in your hands now. You have no further use for me. You might as well peddle me for what you can. A mountain stronghold or a fleet of ships. [...] You said it yourself, the lords of the realm gather like vultures to a carcass, hoping to feast on my bones.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 3: "The Second of his Name"
None of her feelings over Alicent are resolved, at least not fully. In the next ep, we've gotten another time skip, and we're already seeing Rhaenyra and Alicent speaking to one another—a stark contrast to the previous ep, where Rhaenyra wanted nothing to do with her.
Better yet, Rhaenyra moves past her grudge and even comforts Alicent.
"How romantic it must be to be imprisoned in a castle and made to squeeze out heirs."
ALICENT'S FACE FALLS.
"I'm sorry."
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 4: "King of the Narrow Sea"
Her conflict from the previous ep was resolved when Viserys had told her he wouldn't be disinheriting her in Aegon's favor. But that conflict was with Aegon, not Alicent. We don't see her realize she'd displaced her anger over her own status as heir onto her best friend, who at that point, had done nothing but what was expected in their society.
It's minor and can easily be headcanoned away as her maturing off screen during the time skips, but as I outlined here, these timeskips often serve as ways for writers to get out of writing character development and conflict resolution; something that became glaringly obvious in s2 when they stopped having timeskips to rely on.
You may have noticed that up until this point, I've only been talking about Rhaenyra in the friendship, not Alicent. And there's a reason for that: like I outlined in my timeskip post, up until episode 5, Alicent has no wants of her own.
She's presented as a dutiful rule-follower who is programmed to uphold the laws and conventions of Westeros.
As a result, her motivation is guided by others. She goes to the King, because Otto ordered her to, marries him and has his heirs because that's what's expected of her. Likewise, we see her trying to fit into her new house by wearing red and black in s1ep4, not because she wants to, but because that's what a wife's supposed to do. Her only real tether is Rhaenyra, and her desire to keep their friendship going, which, while weak, is still somewhat of a motivation.
Her real arc starts at the end of ep 5, when Cole admits to taking Rhaenyra's virginity. She realizes Rhaenyra's deceived her, and shows up to the wedding feast in a green dress, to implicitly declare war, thus finally forming a motivation; protecting her children.
Which is good, and all, but... what exactly spurned this change? I've seen a lot of discourse about this, and most people think it's because Rhaenyra lied about being despoiled on her Mother's memory. Some say it's because Rhaenyra got Otto fired for essentially telling Vizzy the truth. When the script came out, it was revealed Alicent had a crush on Criston, and was pissed at Rhaenyra for sleeping with him. Then there's people who say it's because she loved Rhaenyra and was jealous of the freedom she got.
It could be one of these reasons, or all of them. The show never explains it. Alicent just declares Rhaenyra her enemy eternal and swears herself to war. Which is fine. I don't mind subtext, or implied motivations, but the shift is too drastic to be left ambiguous, especially for a main character that was never intended to have ambiguous motivations (contrast that with someone like Larys, who is written to be mysterious intentionally).
The issues are compounded, cause, in the next ep, we get a ten year timeskip. This means we get no resolution to the Criston wedding murder, Daemon marrying Laena, or Rhaenyra getting involved with Harwin. We don't get a glimpse into Alicent's reasoning, or a confrontation with Rhaenyra. Just a shoddy, half-baked conclusion, before we speedrun through the rest of the story.
Where it All Goes Downhill
I'll say it: episode 6-7 Alicent is peak, for one major reason; she's consistent.
You can believe that the hurt, disillusioned girl who had declared war at the end of ep5 had grown into a resentful, paranoid woman who has devoted her life to undermining her former friend. In episode 6, she's presented to us as cutthroat, bitchy, self-righteous. She has agency, vields power, commands a seat at the council and is able to put down Viserys and Rhaenyra efficiently.
You may do as you wish, husband. When I am cold in my grave.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Princess and the Queen."
Legit, can you imagine young Alicent ever talking to Viserys like this? Worse, can you imagine her saying this?
Do keep trying, Ser Laenor. Sooner or late, you may get one who looks like you.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Princess and the Queen."
Fucking. Bars.
Which brings me to the most important point: Alicent's motivation. It's clearly spelled out in episode 6 and 7.
ALICENT: If Rhaenyra comes into power, your very life could be forefit. Aemond's as well. She could move to cut off any challenge to her succession.
AEGON: Then I won't challenge—
ALICENT: You are the challenge, you are the challenge, Aegon! Simply by living and breathing! You are the King's firstborn son, and what they know, what everyone in the realm knows in their blood and in bones is that one day, you, will be our King.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Princess and the Queen."
There we go, clear as day. As a male, Aegon's very existence threatens Rhaenyra's claim by Andal precedent and the culture of male primogeniture established in Westeros. Rhaenyra's position is made worse by her sons being very obviously not Laenor's, which basically turbo charges the conflict in Alicent's mind, and makes Aegon, as an obviously Valyrian-looking kid, the more appealing choice to any Rhaenyra dissenters.
At this point, Alicent has seen Rhaenyra flagrantly break rules she was taught were gospel for young women (don't have affairs, don't have illegitimate children or you will be disgraced and severely punished) with no consequences, further exacerbating her fears over Rhaenyra's moral compass. Because if she's able to shirk having legitimate kids and use her status to force her indiscretion into law, what else could she do? What other law and taboo could she break? It may be an extreme position, but believable in the context presented.
And Rhaenyra all but vindicates this in episode 7, when she proves that yes, her kids will harm Alicent's: and no one will do anything about it.
And that's the conflict underpinning the entire Driftmark confrontation:
RHAENYRA: You've gone too far...
ALICENT: I?! What have I done, but what was expected of me? Forever upholding the kingdom, the family, the law! While you flount all to do as you please!
VISERYS: Alicent, let her go!
ALICENT: Where's duty, where's sacrifice?! It's trampled under your pretty foot again!
OTTO: Release the blade, Alicent.
ALICENT: And now you take my son's eye... and to even that you feel entitled.
RHAENYRA: Exhausting, wasn't it? Hiding behind the cloak of your own righteousness. But now they see you as you are.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "Driftmark"
Absolute poetry. Not only do we get the culmination of Alicent's fears but the revelation of her resentment. She isn't just scared for her kids, she's also mourning herself. Hating the fact she had to sacrifice her entire life for nothing, while Rhaenyra didn't have to do the same. Rhaenyra got to have sex with whoever she wanted, have kids out of love, not face any consequences and still retain a position of power not afforded to any other woman.
However, instead of blaming the system that put her in this position, Alicent does the only thing women raised under patriarchy can: attack another woman they think have it better than them. Because a woman is supposed to be on her playing field, while the men are above them in the hierarchy, and thus untouchable.
It's freaking perfect. A portrayal of a flawed, broken woman suffering under patriarchy and lashing out in ways that make absolute sense in the context of her world. Until... episode 8 comes around, and the show just walks all of that back.
Episode 8: Where it All Started Going to Shit
Idc how good people say this ep was. It makes no sense, at least in term of Alicent's character.
We start with another timeskip (as if we haven't had enough of those), and we see Alicent decked out in the Seven pointed star. I think the BTS mentioned that because of the Driftmark incident, Alicent has started armoring herself in the faith to rehabilitate her image. Which fine, would have been nice to actually see that, but at this point, I'm used to the show not doing character development.
She's still sitting the council and governing in Viserys' name, but Otto appears to be stearing the ship for the most part.
Alicent's previous convictions seem to have wavered. When Vaemond arrives to petition for Driftmark, she's hesitant.
OTTO: Hold your nerve, my Queen. What we do, we do for the good of the realm.
ALICENT: I must confess a certain uneasiness now that this is at hand. He may yet live.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Lord of the Tides"
Furthermore, Otto tries to present Luke inheriting as a matter of him being too young to command the Velaryon fleet, rather than the obvious reason: his parentage. But all of them know it's about the bastardy, and Alicent is on board with it, knowing implicitly that should they rule in Vaemond's favor, he will be pledging house Velaryon to them.
The next Lord of the Tides will be deeply in your debt, your Grace.
Vaemond Velaryon, House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Lord of the Tides"
However, Viserys foils their plans, by coming to the hearing himself and ruling in Rhaenyra's favor. This prompts Vaemond to lose his shit and openly call Rhaenyra's kids bastards and her a whore. And before Vizzy can ask for his tongue—you know, the punishment he set for people questioning the parentage of Rhaenyra's sons—Daemon waltzes in and executes him.
This should be a major red flag for Alicent. Like the Driftmark incident, this is yet another example of Rhaenyra's side flagrantly going around the rules and killing anyone who stands in her way (hell, you can even read this petition as a mini version of the conflict for the throne. And Vaemond's execution is a stand-in for what will happen to anyone who challenges Rhaenyra's rights). Yes, Vaemond broke the law Vizzy had set. But by Vizzy's own decree, he was meant to lose his tongue, not his head, and Daemon faces no consequences or backlash for the killing.
That's not even mentioning Daemon himself. The sole reason Rhaenyra was made heir was to keep him away from the crown. Daemon despises Otto, and is a known Rogue with a dangerous reputation. Better yet, he and Rhaenyra are suspected of killing Laenor—a rumor they themselves were happy to stoke.
DAEMON: If you are to be a strong Queen, you must cultivate love and respect, yes, but your subjects must fear you.
RHAENYRA: This will cost Lord Corlys and Princess Rhaenys their only remaining child. And the realm will whisper that I was somehow responsible.
DAEMON: Let them whisper. We will know the truth of it and our enemies won't.
RHAENYRA: They'll fear what else we might be capable of.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 7: "Driftmark"
So this, in Alicent's mind, should be a double whammy. A clear proclamation that Daemon will kill them the second he has a chance. Sure, she could cling to the hope that Rhaenyra wouldn't be evil enough to kinslay, but him? Why would she trust that Rhaenyra can control him? Better yet, what reason does she have to believe Rhaenyra wouldn't just let him do her dirty work and remain blameless?
In summary, everything in the narrative is screaming that Alicent should fear and despise Rhaenyra even more. But, she doesn't. The second the dinner comes, and Rhaenyra toasts her, Alicent folds like a chair and agrees Rhaenyra would make a fine Queen. The execution that happened mere hours ago has been forgotten. As has Driftmark, and the last 16 years of animosity, and scheming—which has likely lasted longer than their goddamn friendship. All because Vizzy said they need to play nice, and women cannot be vindictive, even when their lives depend on it. They must be the gentle, Angels in the House who prioritize peace over the well-being of their own families. Otherwise, the audience can't sympathize with them.
Its absolute bullshit. Like I said, people praise this ep to hell and back, and yet when you look at the writing, it falls apart. It relies on a timeskip to give Alicent a completely different personality that goes against the narrative happening around her. Yeah, you can say she changed cause she regretted attacking Rhaenyra, but you cannot tell me she shouldn't be upset that Rhaenyra married Daemon, allegedly killed Laenor and extrajudicially executed Vaemond. This isn't just about petty jealousy, but her life and the lives of her children.
As great as the dinner scene was, it shouldn't have been honest. It should have been Alicent and Rhaenyra, lying through their teeth, before imploding the second Vizzy leaves. You'd still have the impact of Vizzy thinking he's made things right, while we, as the audience, know he did shit in a twist of dramatic irony.
If they wanted to facilitate peace between these two women, why did they write the story to give them every reason to hate and distrust each other more?
However, the crowning moment of this bullshit is Alicent misunderstanding Viserys on his deathbed. I've seen people try to rationalize this as Alicent gaslighting herself into thinking she is morally right to usurp. Except she shouldn't need an excuse to gaslight herself, if she's already decided to make peace with Rhaenyra.
RHAENYRA: I think it's best we return to Dragonstone.
ALICENT TAKES HER HAND: You've only just arrived.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 8, "The Lord of the Tides"
Mind you, this happens after the Aemond fight. Likewise, s2 dismantles this when we see her be absolutely shocked during the Sept scene that Vizzy was referring to the Conqueror when he was mumbling on his deathbed.
RHAENYRA: It's a story, he once told. About Aegon the Conqueror.
ALICENT: ... the Con-Conqueror...?
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 3, "The Burning Mill"
Next ep, you see her rifling through books, trying to find the relevant passages to clarify the convo. Larys comes to confront her about it, legit asking her about Vizzy changing his mind and she tells him this:
ALICENT: Rhaenyra's supporters will believe what they wish. And so will Aegon's. The war will be fought, many will die. And the victor will eventually ascend the throne. The significance of Viserys' intention died with him.
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 4, "The Red Dragon and the Gold"
There you have it. She implicitly acknowledges she was wrong. Maybe she knew the Vizzy changing his mind story wouldn't be believed, but to her, it was the truth. A righteous reason to launch the war—even though it was absolutely unnecessary. Alicent already had every reason to usurp. Fml, Rhaenyra gave it to her during the Driftmark petition.
But no, her following said reason would mean action on her part. It would mean her willingly participating in the usurpation without the cushion of another's wishes to direct her actions. So, she was stripped of agency, so that she could be left blameless. A helpless little doe confused that the small council was plotting to install her son on the throne.
ALICENT: Am I to understand that members of the small council have been planning secretly, to install my son without me?
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 9, "The Green Council"
People defend this scene as her being pissed she wasn't included in the planing, not that she was entirely ignorant of it. But... that doesn't make sense either. This is the same woman who has been screaming at her sons for years that Aegon will be King, to a point where even 10yo Aemond knew it.
AEGON: She's an idiot!
AEMOND: She's your future Queen.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 7, "Driftmark"
Seeing as her ep 6&7 understood the political climate that could lead to an Aegon/Rhaenyra conflict, she should also know she would need allies to get Aegon on the throne. So how could she possibly be blindsided that Otto started plotting? Hell, it would be the first thing he would have started doing after his return. At best, she could either be pissed he continued doing it after she told him to stop, or deliberately excluding her after she asked to be included—and the wording, to me, doesn't imply either.
So she's left looking like an idiot, a desperate victim who wants to make peace, but her terrible, evil father won't let her.
Contrast that with the books. She's the leader of her faction, who unapologetically advocates for her son's rights. During the green council, she airs out her reason for usurping clearly.
“Nor will they spare my children,” [Alicent] declared. “Aegon and his brothers are the king’s trueborn sons, with a better claim to the throne than her brood of bastards. Daemon will find some pretext to put them all to death. Even Helaena and her little ones. One of these Strongs put out Aemond’s eye, never forget. He was a boy, aye, but the boy is the father to the man, and bastards are monstrous by nature.”
GRRM, Fire and Blood.
She doesn't need to hide behind bullshit misunderstandings when she already has the perfect justification right there. Apart from the Andal tradition Ironrod spells out clearly for everyone, she's also citing her kids' safety. Yes, we know its pretext, a legal reason she can hide behind to advance her ambition. But is it wrong? Can she really say, for certain, that her sons will live out their lives in peace with a woman on the throne, whose kids don't look Targaryen? Rhaenyra might not want them dead, but again, Daemon is a complete wildcard.
(And yeah, yeah, I can hear the dissenters saying 'If Daemon had wanted to kill them, he would have already'. Just because I'm presenting things from her perspective, doesn't mean I agree with her. I'm perfectly capable of seeing stuff from someone's POV without subscribing to their way of thinking.)
This is the reason ep6&7 Alicent made sense—because, like her book self, her reasons for the usurpation are perfectly cohesive. They're in line with the narrative around her, and the feudal world they live in. She represents the convergence between the doe-eyed childbride and the ambitious stepmother from the books—a cutthroat, active player fighting for her family's rights and safety, in accordance with the laws of their world.
But that Alicent is too unpalatable, too villainous. That Alicent has no reason to cleave to Rhaenyra at the expense of her children and long for a doomed yuri romance that didn't exist beyond the subtext the show barely acknowledged. And ofc, that Alicent can't conform to the benevolently sexist narrative that women are all enlightened, self sacrificing beings who only want peace. The audience can't possibly like that Alicent, nor can they root for her.
So ofc, the writers just revert her to pre-timeskip Alicent. The helpless victim who prioritizes Rhaenyra over herself and her children. She's made a pawn once again, a fool who didn't see her father plotting with the council to install Aegon, a woman with no motivations of her own beyond a righteous duty to champion the will of her dead husband—the same as ep 3&4 Alicent who only tried to fit in with her new family because it was expected of her.
It's a character regression, not development, that is further degraded in s2 to justify that ungodly end scene.
Season 2: Wtf Are We Even Doing Anymore
I'll try to keep this segment brief, cause this is already too long for my peace of mind.
But I'll start by saying that Alicent's arc in s2 could have worked.
A gradual realization that all her sacrifices, efforts, her very life, amounted to nothing. She will never be recognized or listened to because she's a woman, and she is obligated to fade into obscurity so the men can lead. It's a fitting arc for what Rhaenys deemed the 'patriarchy simp' on s1ep9. And unlike many fans, I'm not pissed that she seemed shocked nobody wanted her to be named Aegon's Regent.
She thought herself the exception to the rule, thought she would be rewarded for putting Aegon on the throne, with similar, if not the same privileges she had when she was Viserys' regent. But, ofc, she's put down, the war she helped start is slipping from her fingers and her own son is telling her to get back to the kitchen.
"I release you of your seat, such as it was. I'm sure you'll be much pleased to return to more... domestic pursuits."
Aemond Targaryen, House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 6, "The Smallfolk"
Why wouldn't she feel insulted? She's had years of experience doing politics and here's her cocky, murderous son telling her to stfu and basically reducing her to the same broodmare she was when Otto sold her to Vizzy. Yes, Aemond did it cause she was an idiot who kept repeatedly advocating for peace with Rhaenyra well past the point of no return, but it would still sting to have all her accomplishments dismissed like that.
The issue is what happens as a result of her dismissal.
First, let me tackle her relationship with Cole, and I'm about to say it: it's fine. Is it weird that it starts off screen and out of the blue? Yes. But what have learned so far? The show is allergic to doing character development, and they would prefer to hide behind timeskips so you can headcanon them out of doing their job.
On Alicent's side, I completely get it. A repressed woman who spent her teen years and most of her adulthood serving as an incubator/nurse to a Halloween decoration finally getting the freedom to choose her partner? Ofc she'd go nuts and explore her sexuality in ways she wasn't able to previously. The real issue here is Cole, and the fact his character was not developed enough to allow this relationship to organically exist, but that's another can of worms I'm not going to touch.
So, Alicent starts banging Cole and his dick magically transforms her from a bad mother, to an absolutely atrocious one who doesn't give a shit about her kids or grandkids. And yes, I'm being hyperbolic here, but how else are we supposed to take this?
Her s1 self wasn't great. Though she was affectionate with baby Aegon, she struggled with Helaena. She didn't know how to connect with her and pushed her into the same trauma she endured—forced marriage. Which, to be clear, is realistic. It's normal for women under patriarchy to push their daughters into the same fate, even if it was traumatizing for them, because that fate is presented as the only option available for women.
She also failed to rein in Aegon. The few interactions we get between them always ended with her screaming at him, and even hitting him. She fucks up so much, he ends up an alcoholic rapist who has no idea how to rule —even though he's been told he was going to inherit his whole life.
To be fair, Viserys' neglect played a huge part in the mess that are the green kids, so she isn't the only one to blame for this. However, despite her failures, she's still willing to protect her kids, and offer them comfort.
In s1ep6, when Aemond is brought to her after his failed dragon claiming stunt in the pit, she's angry, but also concerned for his well-being. The second he tells her about the Pink Dread, she embraces him. Compare that to her s2 self who sees Aegon crying in his room, and just walks away.
Prior to that scene, we see Otto refusing to comfort her too.
ALICENT: I have sinned..
OTTO: I do not wish to hear of it.
House of the Dragon, Season 2 Episode 2, "Rhaenyra The Cruel"
The writers were trying to make clever commentary about Alicent replicating Otto's inability to comfort her, with her kids. Except this is stupid, because we've seen that Alicent is capable of offering comfort in s1.
Better yet, we've also seen her care about her kids. She goes apeshit post Driftmark and is ready to maim Luke and Rhaenyra both over Aemond's eye. Yes, that moment is as much about her own resentment, but its Aemond's eye that pushes her over the edge. Likewise, we see a moment where she expresses quasi affection for Aegon too.
AEGON: Do you love me?
ALICENT: ... you imbecile
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 9, "The Green Council"
Yes, she's insulting him, but she smiles while she does it. I think it was either in a BTS or an interview that Olivia Cooke said that this was Alicent's moment of playful incredulity. It's supposed to be her way of saying "what kind of question is that? Of course I love you, I did all this because I love you". But if you ask s2 Alicent, nope, all she feels for her sons is resentment and disgust.
AEGON: They don't care what I think.
ALICENT, VISIBLY ANNOYED: Who, Aegon?
AEGON: My council. Cole, Aemond. They pursue their campaign without seeking my aid, or my thoughts.
ALICENT: What thoughts would you have?
House of the Dragon, Season 2 Episode 4 "The Red Dragon and the Gold"
She legit mocks her own son when he comes to her to seek comfort and support, and tells him to stfu and be the good, idiot puppet she can use as a proxy to rule.
Aegon is basically pushed over the edge by this, and ends up going to Rook's Rest to get his shit rocked. When he's dragged back, Alicent barely has any reaction to seeing him mangled. She's more concerned over Aemond and the Regency.
Really? This is the same woman who jumped in front of Meleys to shield Aegon with her body? And yes, you could say she got disillusioned by how awful her sons were being. Aegon is a rapist and Aemond a kinslayer, who, for all she knows, attempted to kill Aegon to take his crown. Fantastic: show me this heel turn. Show me the confrontation between her and Aemond, where she admonishes him as a monster who killed his nephew and now attempted to do the same with his brother. Show Aegon escalating his sexual assaults and her reaching a breaking point where she can't handle covering them up any longer.
But nah. That would require writing conflict and character development. It's just easier to hide behind a timeskip and let your audience headcanon away any issues.
Except even the audience can't headcanon it cause Alicent isn't even acting like what Aemond did is that serious. At best, she's chastising him in public, like he's a little kid who broke a vase, then justifies his actions to Otto in the same episode.
ALICENT: Aemond is angry. Rhaenyra's son took his eye and was never punished for it. What he did, however vicious—
OTTO: The caprice of youth.
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 1, "A Son for a Son"
With Aegon, it's even worse, cause she's just annoyed he isn't listening to her, not doing anything detrimental.
She does nothing except worry over her own affair with Cole, cry over her bestie not accepting her apology, appear mildly concerned about Aegon's wounding, before making vague allusions to Aemond being a monster. However, none of these things push her over the edge. No, it's her own dismissal that does this. Her being denied power.
And fine. I would be wiling to accept her becoming more selfish. She's spent almost two decades prioritizing the needs of others. Maybe she's reached a breaking point and now wants to do stuff just for herself. Besides, her sons are awful—a rapist and murderer respectively—so denouncing them shouldnt be too hard (even though she created this mess, and Daeron didn't do jack shit to deserve being abandoned).
But for her to then turn around and cleave to Rhaenyra as an alternative? No, that's absolute bullshit.
The Most Manufactured Circumstance in the World
A big complaint people had with s2 is that nothing seems to matter. Characters get over death within the span of an episode and people dying has no tangible impact. Contrast this with GOT where characters dying had ripple effects spanning multiple seasons.
And that's by design. Because if we let either Rhaenyra or Alicent mourn their family, you can't have a predetermined ending where Alicent is running to her former bestie to atone for her sins. S1 ends on Rhaenyra being distraught and furious over Luke, telegraphing to the audience that next season, we should expect her to go all fire and blood on her enemies. Except when s2 comes, Rhaenyra folds.
She grieves Luke for an ep, is angry about B&C, and spends the remainder of the season as a wet dish rag who is trying to make peace with the one woman who no longer has any power to decide the outcome of the war. She isn't allowed to feel anger over her stillborn daughter, or Luke being killed, hell, even the usurpation itself.
RHAENYRA: So I should declare war because I'm angry?
DAEMON: No, because it's your duty as Queen to crush rebellion.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 10, "The Black Queen."
Daemon is presented as being in the wrong here, when realistically, he's acting like a medieval Lord. Her throne was usurped, her power undermined. She has an obligation to answer this swiftly, lest she be perceived as weak. And she's already seen as a weak because she's a woman.
However, instead of proving the men around her wrong, she does exactly what they expect a weak woman to do: shy away from war, and desperately grovel in the hopes of achieving peace. Her passivity is framed as wisdom in contrast to the evil, warmongering men, and normal, human emotions are sidelined in an effort to present her as a morally righteous, enlightened being who is fighting for the crown, not out of ambition, but a selfless, divinely ordained greater good.
In short, she was made into the very patriarchal caricature of what a woman is supposed to be season 1 Rhaenys mocked Alicent for.
I've quoted this essay a million times but I'll do it again, because it perfectly illustrates the problem with not letting Rhaneyra be human, vengeful or flawed:
We think of men as antiheroes, as capable of occupying an intense and fascinating moral grey area; of being able to fall, and rise, and fall again, but still be worthy of love on some fundamental level, because if it was the world and its failings that broke them, then we surely must owe them some sympathy.
But women aren’t allowed to be broken by the world; or if we are, it’s the breaking that makes us villains. Wronged women turn into avenging furies, inhuman and monstrous: once we cross to the dark side, we become adversaries to be defeated, not lost souls in need of mending. Which is what happens, when you let benevolent sexism invest you in the idea that women are humanity’s moral guardians and men its native renegades: because if female goodness is only ever an inherent quality – something we’re born both with and to be – then once lost, it must necessarily be lost forever, a severed limb we can’t regrow. Whereas male goodness, by virtue of being an acquired quality – something bestowed through the kindness of women, earned through right action or learned through struggle – can just as necessarily be gained and lost multiple times without being tarnished, like a jewel we might pawn in hardship, and later reclaim.
Foz Meadows, Gender, Orphan Black & The Meta of Meta
Seriously, read their entire essay, its amazing. It encapsulates the issue of HOTD's whitewashed female heroes. The whitewashing puts undo burden on Rhaenyra to remain morally virtuous, and reinforces harmful, biological essentialism that states women are always nice, peaceful moral arbiters. And those women who aren't don't deserve redemption, grace or understanding— but scorn, judgement and condemnation for being irreparably damaged cause they went against their 'natural' programming.
It's a heinous idea, and it ruins the story. Rhaenyra must be like this to be the perfect good guy the audiences can root for. She can't despise Alicent, because that would mean turning her ire on a victimized woman. She's not allowed to seek revenge, only justice to correct an objectively evil deed. Because if she does, she might be *gasp* unlikable! The audience couldn't possibly sympathize with her! She couldn't possibly be justified! (I hope I don't have to flag that this is sarcasm)
That's why in the finale, nobody acknowledges Jaehaerys. Rhaenyra proclaims, with her full chest that in order to atone for her side's mistakes, Alicent has to let Rhaenyra take out the opposition, ie kill Aegon.
"Make it a son for a son."
Rhaenyra Targaryen, House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"
The execution is framed as Alicent making the same sacrifice Rhaenyra made for this war, ie, a son (I don't even want to mention how stupid it is to claim that Alicent, the childbride who gave up her life, freedom and body to bear children for an old man who didn't give two shits about her, didn't 'sacrifice' anything. Are you serious now?)
Acknowledging that the sacrifice was already made, and that an innocent kid has been killed in retribution for an act he had nothing to do with, would harm the moral righteousness of Rhaenyra's side. So Alicent forgets about Jaehaerys, as does Helaena, so that Rhaenyra can continue being the righteous, morally just savior. The trust between them is maintained, and they set aside all previous grievances and the very conventions of the world around them, to choose the greater good.
Like, can you imagine Catelyn and Cersei doing the same?
CAT: "Oh I forgive you for killing my husband, let's not wage a senseless war, protecting the innocents is more important."
CERSEI: "I agree, here, kill my little shit son and his useless younger brother too. My evil dad and husband pushed me into being what I am, I just want to run away and be the free, peace-loving girlie I've always been."
Likewise, Alicent's whitewashing allows her to retain the same innate goodness. The sole reason she participates in all these schemes is because she's forced to by the men around her. After the usurpation, she immediately recognizes the error of her ways, and turns on her sons, seeing them for the monsters that they are. And her, being good at heart, decides to abandon them and allow them to be killed, thus choosing the morally good side she was always aligned with from the beginning. Her having any agency in this usurpation, or wanting it would counteract this, and compromise the idea of her innate goodness. Hence, to be sympathetic, she must remain a victim. A passive actor who is forever put down by others—even as a 30+ yo, grown ass woman.
And I can hear you saying: "But... but, Alicent's betrayal reads as her being a hypocrite! It's her desperate attempt to grovel, to save her own skin! Rhaenyra calls her out on this!"
Sure. It doesn't change the fact that the show presents it as a justified good act, designed to redeem her. In s2ep7, we see her realizing her life was a failure.
"All my life, I have endeavoured to serve my house and the realm. And somehow none of it matters. We are cast aside."
House of the Dragon, Season 2 Episode 7, "The Red Sowing"
The rest of the ep follows her going to a lake to swim. You see her cast aside Hightower greens, in favor of her Mother's Florent blues. She then goes into the water, wearing white, the scene serving as a metaphorical representation of her sins—read; her alliegance to the evil greens—being washed away. In the next ep, you already see her plotting her escape.
HELAENA: I was happier before I was Queen.
ALICENT: What would you think about leaving this place?
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"
Aemond then arrives to ask Helaena to fight against Rhaenyra's new dragonriders. His request is portrayed as stupid and evil, even though the only reason he's asking is because he wants to preserve their family. Now, I'm not saying him manhandling her is justified. Nope, he was a complete psycho, and deserves to be pitched off a cliff for that.
But to present his ask as something heinous is absurd.
AEMOND: 'Tis no longer our rule that is threatened, but our very lives! Would you not have us prevail?
ALICENT: Not like this.... Not like this!
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"
Okay... but how else are they supposed to fight, Alicent? Just sit around and hope Rhaenyra would be nice enough to forgive them? Yes, that's exactly what she expects.
Aemond may have put himself in this position by torching Aegon, yet he isn't wrong to want to utilize another battle resource when his side is disadvantaged. He's the only one who recognizes, rightly, that Rhaenyra would have to execute them to secure her claim. He seems to be the only character, besides Daemon who is thinking like a feudal lord, not to mention following the beliefs his own MOTHER had drilled into his head since he was a child.
But nope. He's fighting for power and survival, which makes him automatically irrational and evil. Alicent realizes this, and has no choice but to run to Rhaenyra to seek salvation for the mess she was 'forced' into.
RHAENYRA: Why are you here?
ALICENT: Because I lost my way. Or rather it was taken from me. All those I put my faith in, my husband, my father, my lover, my son—
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"
Notice the wording. She's pushing the blame for everything that happened on the men in her life. And she's right. Bar s1 eps 6&7, the narrative has worked tirelessly to strip her of agency and present her as the helpless victim led astray by others. Rhaenyra may call her out on wanting to wash her hands of any responsibility, but she's not washing her hands of anything when the show has forced her into perpetual victimhood from the start. She was always 'innately good', and aligned with Rhaenyra, it's just that the men around her didn't let her realize this. And this is why, the second she agrees to sacrifice Aegon and shed her allegiance, she's allowed to be restored to her previous goodness.
"Let them think what they must. I am at last, myself."
Alicent Hightower, House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"
It's an unearned redemption arc, forced into being by stripping her of all agency, contradicting the plot, disregaridng the rules of this world, and exacerbating her previous failings to a point where she stopped caring about her kids and grandkids in between seasons. Likewise, the narrative relies on Rhaenyra being the absolute moral arbiter who won't hold grudges beyond righteous ones (because killing the evil men is absolutely righteous), and trust a woman she should have no tangible reason to trust.
Both of these women are given writer clairvoyance, knowledge that the other still loves them, is blameless and would be willing to forgive and redeem them, even though they logically shouldn't know this, or have any reason to believe it, other than 'she used to be my bestie that one time and is a woman.'
Meanwhile, if we were to use old GOT logic, Alicent should be as aghast by Rhaenyra as she is by everyone else. Fine, keep her arc from s2 where she slowly gets discarded. Have her be angry and horrified at her own sons, but also conflicted because of the love she feels for them. And when the finale comes and she sees the ruin around her, have her cling harder to her cage. Because at that point, Rhaenyra has been her enemy for years. She orchestrated the death of her innocent grandson, and is currently on the warpath to take her childrens' heads. Alicent should have no reason to turn to her, or see her as being more worthy of the crown. She's her enemy, a person she has fought against for almost two decades, who proved herself capable of depravity with Driftmark, Laenor, and B&C. Blood has been spilled—and Alicent should have no other option but to continue on with the things she's set in motion.
You can give her a turning point in s3. If they follow the book, these two women will have an opportunity to confront one another again. There's no reason to contort the plot to suit a predetermined conclusion that doesn't work within the parameters of the plot you wrote.
To Conclude This Unhinged Bible
The show seems to be under the impression that we, as the audience, can't sympathize with women unless they're perfect, blameless victims. We can't understand ambition, a desire for revenge, selfishness, maternal love, cruelty committed out of grief. And I get why: female characters get judged much more harshly than male ones in the court of public opinion. But the solution isn't playing into sexist stereotypes of women as Angels in the House. Those who hold sexist opinions will never be satisfied with a woman's portrayal, no matter how saintly she is. Show Rhaenyra was whitewashed to be as palatable as possible, and she's still reviled and called a stupid, feminist girlboss.
It's far better to do what Fire and Blood wasn't afraid of doing.
Rhaenyra was petulant, ambitious, haughty, and cruel. She was a woman who fought for her own right to sit the throne because she thought herself the exception to the rule. She didn't help other women, nor was she kind to her enemies. Did that make her any less deserving of sympathy? Did that mean her losing her children, suffering betrayal, and getting killed in a manner so horrific, Elinda Massey gouged her own eyes out, was deserved? No, it wasn't.
She was a worthy claimant to support, not because she was a chosen one who reluctantly wanted power cause it's her divinely ordained destiny: but because the laws that dictate a woman must be sidelined because of her sex are wrong and should be challenged.
Similarly, book Alicent was an ambitious, politically cunning player who wanted to use the status quo to advance her own position, no matter the cost. Her end was still an absolute travesty. What she suffered during B&C was horrific, and for her plans to amount to nothing save the destruction of the family she wanted to elevate was gut-wrenching. Just because her book motives are dubious, does not make her any less worthy. Ep 6&7 Alicent proved she can be a compelling character who deserves sympathy and support. Her directing her ire to another woman is wrong but it doesn't mean we as the audience are incapable of seeing her point, or validating her fears.
Nobody expects male characters to be perfect to be worthy of love and sympathy. Why then, should we expect the same of women?
i wanted to share my thoughts on show rhaenyra. I hate to say it but show rhaenyra is just so vanilla and im saying it in the nicest possible way. where is her anger? her fury? her rage? her grief? she mentions luke only once & forgets visenya (her only daughter btw). she goes to meet alicent aka the enemy in the middle of war like she's going to a neighbor's house for dinner.....to talk about peace💀like what peace girl? also her lines "do you remember the tourney held on the day my mother died...we sat next to each other" idgaf if they were besties or that they were "secretly pinning for each other" or whatever bs rhaencients spew. ALICENT AND HER SIDE STILL USURPED YOU SIS WAKE UPPPPP MY GAWD!! alicent didn't think of yall friendship when she put that crown on her son's head, she didn't think of yall friendship when you were forced to walk all that way to her room carrying ur newborn 5 mins after you gave birth & she certainly didn't care about yall friendship when she wore that green dress on the day of ur wedding.
speaking of alicent...ofc they make her support the usurpation because of some misunderstanding and not because she actually wanted to see her son on the throne. what's so wrong in making her evil or give her agency? it would have been more interesting to see alicent evolve from this child bride forced into an unhappy marriage to a cruel, cold & shrewd woman who would move heavens and earth to get her boy on the throne even if it means getting blood on her hands. we see a glimpse of that in ep 6-7 of s1 and then nothing she goes back to being this passive uwu doe-eyed crybaby who can do nothing wrong. in ep 8 of s2, she hops on a ferry to dragonstone in hopes of reuniting with her long lost love rhaenyra & there she goes "ykw? my sons suck i only like my daughter. can we go on an adventure across the narrow sea?" which is just bizarre considering she was the one who browbeat aegon into being king and now she wants to just....escape the consequences??
with all these dogshit plot lines i can already imagine the show's ending. it will be alicent herself poisoning aegon's wine because he killed rhaenyra(and in extension his own sister) giving reasons like "he's gone too far" "I don't recognize you anymore my son, did I really give birth to a monster? " or sumn like that. and then we see a final shot of aegon iii & jaehaera getting married with alicent smiling in the distance or towards the end of her life when she gets the fever she hallucinate about rhaenyra and as she takes her last breath, she says "i hope it is not too late to accept your invitation about riding syrax and go across the narrow sea" with a tears streaming down her face.
Yep, this is what we call, benevolent sexism. The show thinks it's doing something, writing a story about female struggle in a feudal, patriarchal society. Except they forget one crucial thing—to write women as people.
Women are not the moral arbiters of the world. We're flawed, messy, inconsistent. We sometimes don't want to rise above, or be the better person; we want revenge, feel anger, jealousy, have ambition and hunger for power and status, same as any man. And most importantly, we're shaped by our social conditioning and the time we live in.
Book Rhaenyra, and Book Alicent aren't all that complex— especially book Alicent, who might as well be an evil Disney stepmom. But that's mostly because F&B is written as an in-universe history book instead of a POV rendition of the dance. We get to see third party accounts of these people, instead of their own voices, personalities, memories, experiences. And yet, despite this, you rarely, if ever have trouble understanding why these women act the way they do.
Book Alicent is a noble lady, raised in a patriarchal culture that drills into women that their only worth comes from marrying well, and birthing sons. They don't get power, or the same freedoms as men—but the tradeoff is that they might get their blood to inherit wealth and status, which in turn, gives them some sliver of respect and power.
Of course she's then going to feel upset that Viserys broke this unspoken social contract and decided to name a daughter over a son. Of course she's going to do whatever she can to claw back that power, feel jealousy, aggrieved entitlement and spite toward a woman who she thinks has it better than her. And most importantly, of course she's going to believe her children will be in danger if Rhaenyra ascends. Because in this worldview, women are lesser beings who exist below men in the hierarchy. Disrupting that order, and elevating a woman over a man is not going to be received well—especially not by men who rely on this system to stay in power.
Same with Rhaenyra. A Princess who has spent her life as an only child, initially derided for not being a son, only to then become the exception to the rule—a female heir, prized above all others, including the thing she's felt inferior to her whole childhood: a son. You combine that with years of Targaryen exceptionalism, and her being raised at the height of peace-time and Targaryen power and you get a spoiled, entitled person who is obviously going to tie her self-worth to being the heir.
It makes sense these women would be petty. It makes sense they'd jump into war, because they're feudal nobility, who grew up thinking their divine right to rule trumps the lives of worthless peasants. They'd want to be cruel and vicious, because this society expects them to be weak and pathetic, meaning they have to prove themselves competent three times over.
They are people, products of their time, and upbringing, and despite being selfish and *gasp* unlikable, doesn't make them any less deserving of sympathy.
The show doesn't seem to think that. They were of the belief that the audience could never sympathize with Rhaenyra if she unabashedly fought for the throne cause she wanted to. They thought we wouldn't be capable of loving a cunning, ambitious Queen who is convinced her values are correct and wants her son to receive what she thinks he's owed. And I sort of get their POV. Show Dany is a lot like book Rhaenyra (proud, stubborn, singularly focused on getting her crown and unapologetic about it), and the backlash her character received post S8 (and even before this) was rabid.
So ofc they thought toning both Alicent and Rhaenyra down and making their motivations be something other than personal ambition would help. But by doing this, they inadvertently jumped into the trap of benevolent sexism.
Neither of these women have any 'wants' of their own. Show Rhaenyra fights for the crown cause it's her 'duty', ie an ancient prophecy told her so. She disregards normal motherly grief and rage in favor of being a self sacrificing arbiter of peace who somehow feels no entitlement to rule, despite her environment, and the knowledge of her being the promised hero. All because she, as a woman, is more noble than that. I hope I don't have to tell you why this is sexist.
It's the same old gender essentialism that pegs women into the 'mother box'—she's the meek, passive voice of peace, there to manage the warmongering men and steer them toward a 'gentler' course. Its funny, cause Alicent and Rhaenys have a conversation about this in s1ep9, and Rhaenys rightfully points out how Alicent advocating for her son is her just making a wall in the window of her prison. And we as the audience are supposed to agree with Rhaenys, to see the hypocrisy of Alicent's reasoning. Except the show ends up vindicating that belief by having every single woman be like that.
Alicent is the same, doe-eyed child bride she was at 15. She has no agency of her own even as an adult 30+yo woman, and is always being forced to do stuff by her Father, or her sons. She feels no grief over the death of her grandson, is willing to sacrifice her own children simply cause 'war bad, Rhaenyra good.'
Despite arguably starting the war, the narrative wants to present her choice of surrendering to Rhaenyra as 'morally righteous'. Because by choosing the 'good side', she is atoning for her actions, and once again putting personal grievances aside for the sake of the greater good. Its asinine and doesn't work, because the choice makes her seem like an evil, callous hypocrite (she's legit offering up her sons for slaughter–including the one who was entirely uninvolved in this mess). Plus, it comes off as disingenuous, because the narrative has given her and Rhaenyra every fucking reason under the sun to hate each other and want the other dead.
But, because they're the noble, Angels in the House they are obligated to put aside all grievances and make peace. And if they do have any grievances, they are morally justified (like Rhaenyra taking out Aegon and Aemond, because both of them are just soooooo evil. Nvm that the son for a son justification doesn't work because Jaehaerys was killed. But oh, right, we can't have anyone be angry over that, so look away kids!)
And this pattern doesn't apply just to them—but to almost all the female characters in the show. In s1 Rhaenys tells Rhaenyra:
"Men would sooner put the realm to the torch, than see a woman on the Iron Throne."
The line not only reveals Rhaenys's bitterness over being passed over, but the innate understanding of the patriarchal culture they live in. The succession will always be challenged, because Rhaenyra is viewed as inherently inferior, because of her sex. And as a result, she will have to fight, tooth and nail, to not only be taken seriously, but keep her place.
Then, fast forward to s2, and what is Rhaenys telling her? Stop fighting, be passive, seek peace even while being attacked and undermined and hope the men will give you the crown because you asked nicely. It's bullshit. Nevermind that her reasons for supporting Rhaenyra make no sense either. Because she wants to keep the peace? Barely a few episodes ago, Rhaenys was convinced Rhaenyra and Daemon had her son killed. And instead of feeling resentment over it, feeling trapped and obligated to support Rhaenyra because Baela and Rhaena are Daemon's daughters and thus, intrinsically tied to the black cause... she gets over it. She sets aside righteous anger and suspicion over Laenor, to support Rhaenyra because 'she's fighting for the greater good'.
Baela too, has no ambition of her own. Neither she, nor Rhaena have any opinions on the Driftmark inheritance, nor are they allowed to feel resentment over the fact Daemon and Rhaenyra married before their Mom's body was even cold. Baela exists just to hype Rhaenyra up, and manage Jace's feelings for him, while Rhaena is there to cosplay Aemond's s1 arc, except make it worse.
Even Alys fucking Rivers and Mysaria were made the 'protectors of the innocent'. In the books, Mysaria is a female Varys, a cunning and ambitious woman who has no issue helping Daemon orchestrate the death of a child. She latches herself to power to secure benefits for herself, and if you believe the theory, may have been responsible for Rhaenyra's downfall, because she stoked her paranoia about Daemon and Nettles' affair. But on the show, she's the champion of the people, who supports Rhaenyra cause she's 'helping the smallfolk'.
Alys is fascinating. A baseborn witch who starts out as a victim of a 19yo dragonriding Prince who annihilates her entire family and takes her as a sex slave. But then, she flips the script on him, and gets him so obsessed with her, he disregards his own army, to the point that they get destroyed, all so he can stay with her. Depending on your reading, she maybe lets him to die as a possible sacrifice to make her child living, or he just dies on accident because she misinterpreted her vision of the Gods eye.
Regardless, she's adamant about being his widow and Queen post war, and is eager to launch a rebellion to conquer the throne on her son's behalf—by any means necessary, including exploding her enemies' heads and putting death curses on those who bad mouth her. And why does she do all this? Because she wants to. Maybe she has some greater, esoteric motivation, like book Euron, or maybe she's just ambitious. However you look at it, her goal is ultimately selfish because it seeks to destabilize a kingdom that is fresh off a brutal civil war, on behalf of a possibly illegitimate child and his witch mother.
Meanwhile, her show self is not only implied to be a Three Eyed Raven-like figure, but exists solely as the arbiter of fate. She's seemingly there to work out Daemon's feelings for him, mom him into stopping his war crimes and accepting his Queen. Her sole motivation—for now—seems to be the prophecy, and protecting the innocents; which is absurd, if you know her and Aemond's cannon relationship. So, in s3, its likely they'll just have her mom him like she did with Daemon, fail to stop his warcrimes, and then reluctantly send him to die at the God's eye to preserve the greater good. Which once again, would do nothing to dispel the benevolent sexism narrative, because she would only exist as an accessory to his villain arc; the sad woman who failed to redeem the bad man.
And you may ask, why is this a bad thing? Why shouldn't the media portray women as inherently better? Well, simple. Because it puts undo burden on women. It enforces the bullshit gender binary, that pidgeonholes women into passive, nurturing roles. It forces women to be perfect, to be the pinnacles of moral virture. And should they ever fail to live up to the standard, they get punished for it.
I already used this quote from Foz Meadows' essay "Gender, Orphan Black & The Meta Of Meta" but I have to use it again, because it so perfectly captures the core issue of why this trope is harmful:
We think of men as antiheroes, as capable of occupying an intense and fascinating moral grey area; of being able to fall, and rise, and fall again, but still be worthy of love on some fundamental level, because if it was the world and its failings that broke them, then we surely must owe them some sympathy. But women aren’t allowed to be broken by the world; or if we are, it’s the breaking that makes us villains. Wronged women turn into avenging furies, inhuman and monstrous: once we cross to the dark side, we become adversaries to be defeated, not lost souls in need of mending.
Which is what happens, when you let benevolent sexism invest you in the idea that women are humanity’s moral guardians and men its native renegades: because if female goodness is only ever an inherent quality – something we’re born both with and to be – then once lost, it must necessarily be lost forever, a severed limb we can’t regrow. Whereas male goodness, by virtue of being an acquired quality – something bestowed through the kindness of women, earned through right action or learned through struggle – can just as necessarily be gained and lost multiple times without being tarnished, like a jewel we might pawn in hardship, and later reclaim.
To conclude this rant, the show fucked all its female characters bad, and has suffered as a result. Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go drown my sorrow in fanfic and chant to the Spaghetti Monster to make George finish those fucking books.
Back at it again with my rants (Pt1, Pt2, Pt3 and Pt4 here. Damn, I need to make a dedicated post for this stuff, cause it's getting LONG). I want to tackle the art of writing a villain and how HOTD failed miserably at it.
So let's discuss Ao3's fave bf (yes, guilty as charged 💋 fanfics and cannon are two different things, so enjoy whatever floats your boat!)
Enjoy!
100% The Villain
Unpopular opinion, but the show doesn't hate the greens. I've seen people assert this with their full chests, just because s2 didn't present them in a perfectly flattering light. And this, I'll say, is objectively untrue. S2 destroyed every character, TB and TG, and the culprit wasn't bias—unless you're counting writer bias, in which they thought their interpretation of ASOIAF trumped George's—but poor writing across the board.
Everyone was whitewashed (bar Daemon who was both whitewashed and blackwashed, but I'll handle him in a dedicated post). The evil stepmom, the spoiled, arrogant Princess, the sulky, angry rival brother, the 2D woman who only exists to suffer, and the war criminal villain.
Because yes, book Aemond is the closest thing to a villain F&B has, even among characters who are just awful.
He's a certified war criminal, even by ASOIAF standards, who exterminated an entire house cause he got pissed his uncle got one over on him, and napalmed a whole region cause he wanted to get Daemon's attention
The duel that followed was utterly one-sided, all the accounts agree; the prince cut the old man to pieces, then fed his corpse to Vhagar. Nor did Ser Simon’s grandsons long outlive him. One by one, every man and boy with Strong blood in his veins was dragged forth and put to death, until the heap made of their heads stood three feet tall. Thus did the flower of House Strong, an ancient line of noble warriors boasting descent from the First Men, come to an ignoble end in the ward at Harrenhal.
---
No longer tied to castle or host, the oneeyed prince was free to fly where he would. It was war as Aegon the Conqueror and his sisters had once waged it, fought with dragonflame, as Vhagar descended from the autumn sky again and again to lay waste to the lands and villages and castles of the riverlords. House Darry was the first to know the prince’s wroth. The men bringing in the harvest burned or fled as the crops went up in flame, and Castle Darry was consumed in a firestorm.
GRRM, Fire & Blood
Like he kills children, and targets primarily non-combatants, instead of, idk, going after the Freys, Blackwoods, Mootons and all those great Lords that made up the bulk of Rhaenyra's army. I checked old ASOIAF forum posts from 2019, and he ranked as the worst and most bloodthirsty character during the dance. A certified mad Targaryen, who wasn't just cartoonishly cruel, but overall unpleasant.
He's arrogant, paranoid, haughty, hot-tempered. His primary concern is getting power for himself, and proving his mettle against the one guy he sees as a worthy opponent: Daemon.
[Aemond] had no need of his brothers or their dragons, he declared; Aegon was too badly hurt, Daeron too young. Aye, Caraxes was a fearsome beast, savage and cunning and battle-tested…but Vhagar was older, fiercer, and twice as large. Septon Eustace tells us that the Kinslayer was determined that this should be his victory; he had no wish to share the glory with his brothers, nor any other man.
GRRM, Fire & Blood
In short, he's a villain. Worse, he's a bad villain, lacking in any obvious depth, vulnerability or complexity. His one alleviating circumstance the loss of his eye and that's (no, I'm not numbering his relationship with Alys here, because I don't see it as good. Before you jump on me, no, I don't think she was 100% the victim here, and this was fully non consensual. I'll be doing a separate deep dive where I'll discuss this ship and my theories around it)
Which is somewhat understandable. F&B isn't a POV style novel, but a fictional history book written using third hand accounts. Of course Aemond's going to come off as 2D because we don't get access to his head, just other people's perception of him and his actions (which don't do him any favors).
Which is why the writers needed to flesh him out into a more rounded and believable character to make him work on the small screen.
So dear One-eye got a good dose of TV-friendly whitewashing, which went a long way into making him likeable.
Until... it didn't.
The Show: A Villain, or Not
Right off the bat, HOTD purged a lot of book Aemond to make what we get on the small screen palatable.
To start off, let's look at Aemond's personality. His show self is a shy, loner who spends most of his time training or studying. He's bullied for not having a dragon by both his brothers and his nephews and seems to exist outside their social circle—and all social circles in general.
This is in contrast to his book self. Book Aemond also didn't have a dragon, but F&B makes no mention of him being bullied about it. I've seen people assert that Viserys did bully him because of this line.
GRRM, Fire & Blood
Only the middle son, Prince Aemond, remained dragonless, but His Grace had hopes of rectifying that, and had put forward the notion that perhaps the court might sojourn at Dragonstone after the funeral. A wealth of dragon’s eggs could be found beneath the Dragonmont, and several young hatchlings as well. Prince Aemond could have his choice, “if the lad is bold enough.”
This is absurd, because not only is Viserys the one who is eager to get Aemond a dragon, he also commands the court to go to Dragonstone to facilitate it. Dragons are dangerous creatures, and you need balls of steel to handle them. Grown adults can't achieve this, let alone a child of 10.
The comment may be callous, but it's not malicious. It just pisses Aemond off cause he's a 10yo who feels excluded from having a special pet of his own.
What did [Aemond] want with some puny hatchling, or some stupid egg? Right there at High Tide was a dragon worthy of him: Vhagar, the oldest, largest, most terrible dragon in the world.
GRRM, Fire & Blood
Likewise, book Aemond doesn't come off as a shy, bookish loner. From what little info we get, he's wild, wilful, and ferocious from the jump. Show Aemond only gains confidence after he's claimed Vhagar and we see him shit talking Baela and Rhaena as a result.
Your Mother's dead. And Vhagar has a new rider now.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 7, "Driftmark"
IMO, these personality tweaks are a good change, because it gives Aemond multiple disadvantages to overcome from the start, and thus, grow as a character. Plus, it immediately endears him to the audience. Everybody likes a good underdog, especially if they've experienced bullying.
Next, it's his relationships with his family. To start off, let me flag that de-aging Alicent to be Rhaenyra's bestie, inadvertantly changed not just their dynamic, but their kids' dynamics too.
If we take the timeskips, Aemond and Jace are supposed to be the same age, bar a year between them maybe (in the books he's ten, while Jace, Luke and Joff are 6, 5 and 3, respectively.) This makes Aemond peers with his nephews and allows for him to be victimized more easily.
Likewise, his dynamic with Aegon was.. changed? Made worse? Tbh, I'm reluctant to say this, because we barely get anything about their relationship in F&B to give us a clear picture of what they really thought of each other, and what we do get is conflicting info. Aemond is eager to win the Baratheons for Aegon one minute, and the next, he's boasting about how much better his brother's crown looks on him.
Aegon seems to have a more favorable opinion of Aemond; he throws him a welcome feast after he gets back from killing Luke and commissions a gold statue be built of him and Daeron after he retakes the throne. In my opinion, this isn't enough information to say he was a kind and devoted brother, because you can read both these things as him venerating Aemond for services rendered to him during the war.
Aegon II welcomed Prince Aemond home with a great feast, hailed him as “the true blood of the dragon,” and announced that he had made “a good beginning.”
GRRM, Fire & Blood
---
“Rhaenyra the Pretender was gone, her dragons dead, the mummer kings all fallen, and yet the realm knew not peace,”
---
During this time King Aegon II also commanded that the Dragonpit be restored and rebuilt, commissioned two huge statues of his brothers Aemond and Daeron (he decreed they should be larger than the Titan of Braavos, and covered in gold leaf), and held a public burning of all the decrees and proclamations issued by the “dayfly kings” Trystan Truefyre and Gaemon Palehair.
Meanwhile, his enemies were on the march. Down the Neck came Cregan Stark, Lord of Winterfell, with a great host at his back (Septon Eustace speaks of “twenty thousand howling savages in shaggy pelts,” though Munkun lowers that to eight thousand in his True Telling), even as the Maiden of the Vale sent off her own army from Gulltown: ten thousand men, under the command of Lord Leowyn Corbray and his brother Ser Corwyn, who bore the famous Valyrian blade called Lady Forlorn.
---
All of the Sea Snake’s warnings had proved true. Casterly Rock, Highgarden, and Oldtown had been slow to reply to the king’s demand for more armies. When they did, they offered excuses and prevarications in the place of promises.
---
King Aegon II would soon stand naked before his enemies, all of the king’s men knew.
GRRM, Fire & Blood
So, until George releases the POV rendition of the Dance (which is never gonna happen), my reading is that we don't know what they thought of each other for sure. (More for Aemond than Aegon, cause you can also read this as familial love and unity)
Regardless, the show used them to create the classic older, more amiable, less worthy heir, vs, the competent, roguish spare dynamic. Its frighteningly common in period dramas, fantasy, hell, even ASOIAF itself. Aenys and Maegor, Viserys and Daemon, Robert and Stannis, you get the point.
The older brother usually loves and teases the younger one, while the younger feels resentment and envy toward the elder for the position they have. Show Aegon and Aemond most closely parallel Book Stannis and Robert. Aegon bullies Aemond, just like how Robert bullied Stannis. Robert is the social, amiable one, fond of drinking and whoring, while Stannis is the dutiful, serious brother everyone finds dull.
Robert loved Stannis as a brother but didn't like him as a person—still, he tried to honor him as was his due. Stannis, in contrast was bitterly resentful of Robert his entire life, but served him because he believed it was his duty. Bar a few differences, this is Show Aegon and Aemond almost to a tee (you can even speculate this is them in the books). Hell, even the way Aegon perceives Aemond is similar. He sees him as this loyal hound he can just sic on his enemies; that stuck-up, annoying pipsqueek he used to tease when they were younger.
Hell, I saw someone theorize Aegon likely didn't even see what he did to Aemond as bullying, and I lowkey agree:
ALICENT: Whose idea was it? The pig? Was it your plot?
AEGON: No... it was Jace... it was the two of them. I couldn't be sure...
ALICENT: Aemond is your brother.
AEGON: Well, he's a twat.
ALICENT: We are family. You may cuff him about as you wish at home, but in the world, we defend our own.
AEGON: It was funny...
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Princess and the Queen"
Like to him, it was just a harmless prank. But to Aemond, its scarring
AEMOND: They gave me a pig!
ALICENT: A what?
AEMOND: They said they found a dragon for me. But it was a pig.
ALICENT: You will have a dragon, one day. I know it.
AEMOND: They all laughed...
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Princess and the Queen"
He's already dejected about not having a dragon, and to have Aegon rub salt in the wound like that is even worse. Furthermore, Aemond is presented as the more politically savvy of the two, the one who has internalized Alicent's warnings and teachings.
AEGON: We have nothing in common.
AEMOND: She's our sister.
AEGON: You marry her then.
AEMOND: I would perform my duty, if only Mother had only betrothed us.
AEGON: If only...
AEMOND: It would strengthen the family. Keep our Valyrian blood pure.
AEGON: She's an idiot!
AEMOND: She's your future queen.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Princess and the Queen"
I know folks like to use this scene as proof of Helaemond, but to me, this scene was always a character moment for Aegon and Aemond; a way to highlight their differing personalities. Aegon is more concerned about his personal discomfort over the marriage, while Aemond's primary concern is duty.
He deliberately focuses on the political benefits Aegon would get when he marries Helaena, instead of highlighting, for example, her lovely personal qualities. Like the only 'flattering' thing he has to say about her is 'she's our sister'—and that's barely flattering at all. And most importantly, he reveals that even as a 10yo second son behind his brother in the line of succession, he's still more attune to his Mother's political machinations. Better yet, he's implicitly behind them, and judges Aegon for not taking it as seriously, and running off to drink and harass the staff.
Which makes the fact he's denied heirship and recognition all the more tragic. He's clearly more competent of the two brothers. Post time-skip, we've seen that he's grown up into a proficient swordsman despite his physical impairment.
He still loyally serves his family, and puts duty to the forefront.
AEMOND: I'll come with you.
ALICENT: That would not be my desire. Aemond, if anything has happened...
AEMOND: Cole needs me, Mother. Ser Erryk isn't the only one who knows Aegon's doings
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Green Council"
Even though he hates being second born, and is bitterly resentful that despite being so competent, he will forever remain in Aegon's shadow.
AEMOND: "Here I am, trawling the city, ever the good soldier, in search of a wastrel who's never taken half an interest in his birthright.
'Tis I, the younger brother who studies history and philosophy, it is I who trains with a sword, it is I who ride the largest dragon, it is I who should be—"
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 6, "The Green Council"
Let's ignore the fact that this is essentially a neckbeard 'I studied the blade' monologue, it perfectly encapsulates the core of his character. Resentment, ambition, unrealized potential. But unlike in the books where he thirsts for power and barely anything else, show Aemond is also deeply vulnerable. A child who was shaped into this not just by the trauma of his maiming, but his family life.
Let me preface this by saying that show Viserys was made much worse in HOTD. There is no indication that he was this neglectful toward Alicent's kids in the books (or neglectful at all). He's implied to have married her out of love, and the books state he strived to appease both sides of his family. Likewise, if the previous quote about him is anything to go by, he seems like an indulging father who was eager to get his kid a flying nuke of his own, so he wouldn't feel excluded.
Show Viserys isn't like this. He shows repeated, blatant favoritism toward Rhaenyra, doesn't love Alicent, and ignores the green kids. And while his book and show counterparts end up making the Driftmark (Book Dragonstone) fight about the parentage of Rhaenyra's kids, show Viserys functionally does end up doing nothing about it.
Book Viserys deliberately orders Rhaenyra to stay on Dragonstone, to avoid further conflict.
To prevent further conflict, and put an end to these “vile rumors and base calumnies,” King Viserys further decreed that Queen Alicent and her sons would return with him to court, whilst Princess Rhaenyra confined herself to Dragonstone with her sons.
GRRM, Fire & Blood
On the show, no such decrees are made. All Vizzy does is tell everyone to stfu about the Velaryon boys being bastards and sweeps the eye thing under the rug.
All while Aemond, his son, his flesh and blood, is right there, with his damn eye carved out. I get why Aemond looks at him with such scorn. The old fart made 0 effort to comfort him. He didn't even ask him how he was doing before he started raving about Rhaenyra's kids. Show Viserys might as well have told Aemond that yes, Rhaenyra's kids are allowed to maim him, and he doesn't care about him enough to do anything meaningful to stop it. (Yes, I hate Viserys. Can't you tell?)
But not only is he burdened by an uncaring Father, but also, a vulnerable Mother. Alicent's relationship with him is bare bones, but at least in s1, you get the impression they're close, and she's his sole source of comfort.
After the Driftmark fight, she's the only one in his corner, the only one demanding people acknowledge the hurt done to him, and give him justice. And yet, after she ends up charging Rhaenyra, he's the one who has to comfort her.
AEMOND: Do not mourn me, Mother. I may have lost an eye, but I gained a dragon.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 7, "Driftmark"
Right after this, he's seen hugging her, and half shielding her with his body. Like... he's ten here, and he has to manage his grown Mother's emotions. When Viserys confronts him about the source of the bastardy rumors, he lies, specifically to protect Alicent from the consequences. He's acting like an adult here, a parentified kid who has to manage a family dynamic where his Mother is at risk, and his own Father doesn't care, and doesn't want to protect him.
Personally, I'd hazard a guess that this is why he molded himself into a warrior. He had no other choice. His own father, the person who was supposed to shield him, left him stranded in favor of his half-sister. Viserys' favoritism of Rhaenyra puts Aemond and his family in danger should she ascends. Unless he assumes the protector role Vizzy never filled, no one else will.
Like during the dinner, in episode 8, Aegon goads Jace into exploding. Aemond is immediately seen rising to his feet, to give him a menacing stare. He doesn't even like Aegon. He thinks he's a stupid, sloppy drunk, and yet, he's still willing to come to his defense, simply because he's his blood. He's internalized Alicent's adage of 'out in the world, we defend our own,' and despite his personal feelings, is still committed to his duty.
And yet, even though he acts like a stone cold badass, he's still deeply insecure. He hasn't moved on from the eye trauma, and it just takes Luke smirking at the pig during dinner to have him crack.
He feels his own worst insecurity has been prodded, so he attacks Luke by prodding at his own worst insecurity too.
AEMOND: Final tribute. To the health of my nephews. Jace, Luke and Joffrey. Each of them handsome, wise... strong.
ALICENT: Aemond—
AEMOND: Come! Let us drain our cups! For these three, strong boys.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 8, "The Lord of the Tides"
He seems playful about it, like he's just trying to stir shit to assert his dominance. But his real feelings come through at Storm's End.
LUKE: I will not fight you. I came as a messenger, not a warrior.
AEMOND: Fight would be little challenge. No. I want you to put out your eye. As payment for mine. One will serve. I would not blind you. I plan to make a gift of it to my Mother.
LUKE: No.
AEMOND: So you're a craven as well as a traitor.
BORROS: Not here.
AEMOND: Give me your eye, or I will take it bastard!
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 10, "The Black Queen"
Not only does he lose his cool, but he also lets pettiness get the better of him. He purposefully chases Luke on his massive war dragon, laughing like mad the entire time. Yes, there's malice in this act, definitely a good dose of cruelty. But I don't think he had 100% murderous intent. He was exercising power over Luke, humiliating him in a way he used to be humiliated back when he was a kid.
Except, well, he's doing it on a sentient flying nuke, and Vhagar doesn't understand the difference between just scaring your enemy into thinking you're going to kill him, and actually killing him.
Now, I know the choice of having this be an accident was controversial. The show relies way too much of accidents, misunderstandings and contrivances to drive its plot, and I definitely agree that Ryan needs to give his characters some damn agency.
However, in Aemond's case, I think it works.
First, if you think dragons and riders have a psychic bond, then you can headcanon that Vhagar sensed that Aemond wanted Luke dead and just acted on it. Secondly, it does a lot to humanize his character. This strong, disciplined badass is at the end, a bullied kid who let power and resentment get the better of him. And you can see he regrets it. Despite the harm Luke caused him, he really didn't want to go so far as to actually kill him.
IMO, its excellent character work. They turned a flat, unlikable villain into a compelling, charismatic, character audiences can root for.
But, as usual, HOTD takes wonderful development done in s1, and absolutely demolishes it in s2.
Season 2 And The Making of Book Aemond; By Any Means Necessary
In case my rants weren't obvious, I think season 2 was bad. Rushed plots that also somehow dragged, lackluster character development, and themes shallower than a puddle.
Aemond is perhaps the best example of this. From a complex, well rounded and sympathetic character, he's reduced to an NPC with barely any screen time for the first 4 episodes. Afterwards, he snaps, burns Aegon at Rook's Rest, has a brief stint as a wannabe tyrant, before ending the season crying cause the walking spoiler told him he was gonna die.
So wtf happened here? He wasn't the main in s1 either, yet the story still managed to give him a consistent, and well-thought out arc.
The answer: time skip.
I've mentioned in a previous post how timeskips are just a convenient excuse for the writers to get out of writing development and conflict resolution, and Aemond is no exception. Except his time skip is particularly egregious because it didn't need to happen.
The immediate aftermath of Luke's death is one of the most pivotal moments in the books, because it marks the official start of the war, and Aemond's descent into villainy.
"And with [Lucerys'] death, the war of ravens and envoys and marriage pacts came to an end, and the war of fire and blood began in earnest."
GRRM, Fire & Blood
Book Alicent and Otto are horrified and admonish him for his actions.
If [Aemond] thought to receive a hero’s welcome, he was disappointed. Queen Alicent went pale when she heard what he had done, crying, “Mother have mercy on us all.” Nor was Ser Otto pleased. “You only lost one eye,” he is reported to have said. “How could you be so blind?”
GRRM, Fire & Blood
Afterwards, he gets branded a Kinslayer—the worst taboo in planetos— something which follows him for the rest of his life.
And the show just... skips this. Even though it would be natural to start with the immediate aftermath to tie all those loose ends, S2 starts 10 days after Luke's death, and ep1 only implies Alicent and Aemond have argued over it.
"And Vhagar is needed here. To deter Rhaenyra from attacking. In retribution for the death of her son."
Alicent Hightower, House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 1, "A Son for a Son."
Like she barely seems that pressed. More like an angry mom, scolding her kid for breaking a vase. Likewise, Aemond comes off as pissy that mommy would dare scold him when she started it first by usurping.
AEMOND: And Alicent is simply... angry
CRISTON: Angry?
AEMOND: She blames me for starting this war, after she plotted with my Father's Council to usurp his throne. Her grace... speaks with two tongues.
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 1, "A Son for a Son"
It all seems so... childish and inconsequential, rather than the earth shattering event that isolated Aemond from his family, and made him lose his one support system.
Better yet, the show never explains the significance of kinslaying.
"No man is as accursed as a kinslayer."
This mantra is repeated multiple times across the ASOIAF series, and most of its characters believe there is real, tangible consequences to this taboo.
We don't get the same feeling on the show. Luke dying is bad cause he's Rhaenyra's son, and that means Alicent can no longer make peace with her bestie. Bad Aemond, go to time out! Its stupid.
Especially because it doesn't align with the snap Aemond experiences as the season progresses— even though Ryan wants to you to believe the killing triggered it.
Ep1 ends with B&C—which, in and of itself, was poorly handled. The greens are sad about it for like 15min before its swiftly forgotten, and we spend the rest of the season pretending like it never happened.
Aemond is probably the worst about this because he has no reaction at all. He's not told about it, isn't seen interacting with anyone in his family during the entirety of ep2. Nobody even references that Jaehaerys was killed in retaliation to him killing Luke. The episode is just him, sitting butt naked in a brothel, making vague allusions to how he regrets what he did to his nephew. (WHY ARE YOU NOT TALKING ABOUT YOUR OTHER NEPHEW OMG???)
The scene is framed... strangely. For one, it has Oedipus written all over it. Madame Sylvi is much older than him, and the person who SAd him when he was 13. We're never explicitly shown the two of them having sex, just Aemond, lying naked on her lap in the fetal position. He even gets served hot milk at one point. Ryan might as well have dug up Freud to scream at the audience how 'its about his mom!'
And it makes sense. Alicent was his everything, the one person he clung to for emotional support and guidance. And to lose her, after such a pivotal moment that left him vulnerable, likely shattered him— enough to push him into the arms of the woman who abused him when he was a child, and who he hasn't seen since then;
How you've grown...
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 9, "The Green Council"
However, in s2, it seems like he's been to see Madame Sylvi more than once.
AEMOND: Daemon sent them to kill me. I was out.
SYLVI: You were with me.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 9, "The Green Council"
The problem here, is that this was never shown properly to us. Because Ryan chose to exclude the immediate aftermath of Luke's death, we don't get to see Aemond rejected. We don't get to see the social stigma of kinslaying, the court looking at him weird, people avoiding him. We also don't get to see him confronted with the consequence of the killing—Jaehaerys' death.
Because while Daemon was 100% responsible for B&C, it happened in response to Luke's death. Aemond already felt guilty over that; it stands to reason he would implode even further when he connects those two things together. But nope. He never mentions Jaehaerys once, and nobody in his family confronts him about it either. (Nobody bar Aegon seems to want any sort of retaliation which... okay, completely normal human reaction, good job)
So this scene is just... strange. An unnecessarily graphic way to telegraph Aemond's mommy issues, without addressing the core problem that led to it.
Which brings me to the elephant in the room. The betrayal.
Unlike many, I didn't think it came out of nowhere or that it was OOC. S1 already established that Aegon and Aemond don't have a good relationship. Aegon bullied Aemond all his life, and Aemond grew up to be extremely resentful of his brother. The issue is how we got there.
Yeah, the scene of him mocking Aemond at the brothel was brutal, but... did it merit attempted fratricide? Again, s1 showed Aemond was willing to defend Aegon against Rhaenyra's kids, even though he didn't like him.
It's clear the writers intended this scene to be the straw that broke the camel's back, and just pushed Aemond into pure, unadulterated violence. Aegon has bullied Aemond when he was a kid, but we don't get scenes of him doing it as an adult (before the brothel thing)
We don't get scenes of them disagreeing, or having any kind of tension to telegraph that yes, their relationship has gotten worse, and Aemond is getting fed up. The brothel scene doesn't work as the 'last straw' when you don't show the straws that preceed it.
The writers needed to show Aemond not only losing Alicent, but getting rejected by the rest of his family too. Have Helaena be unwilling to speak with him because of what happened. At the brothel, instead of Aegon teasing him about pointless nonsense, have him reference Jaehaerys.
"So this is where you were. Fucking whores whilst my son was getting killed."
Just one line that would not only acknowledge that Aegon hasn't forgotten his son died within the span of an episode, but also unravel Aemond; poke at that very guilt that's been eating away at him since Luke.
And what happens when Aemond's worst insecurity gets prodded? He lashes out. Abandoned by his Mother, rejected by the court who call him kinslayer, and now scorned by the brother he's despised his whole life, he has nothing left, no duty, no 'side' he can call his own. No other choice but to say "fuck it", and fight for the only thing left—his own power.
But nah. It's easier to just have Aegon act like a drunk frat boy, and headcanon away the reasons why Aemond betrays him. Likewise, it undermines the military literacy the show has previously given him. The greens are at a disadvantage already cause they have fewer dragons, and Aemond decides to just take out their only other fighting mount cause Aegon was mean to him.
It's stupid—in line with book Aemond, who thinks Vhagar makes him nigh invulnerable, but show Aemond? No.
After Rook's Rest, Aemond's character once again stagnates. The betrayal has made him flip a switch, go from the morally complex, gray character to his moustache twirling book self.
Seriously, s2ep6 Aemond is the closest he's ever been to the books. Arrogant, egotistical, pigheaded. He gets triggered about Jason 'daring' to summon him, ignores everyone's advice before arrogantly proclaiming himself Daemon's challenger.
It's a ridiculous, forced jump from the haughty, but somewhat calculating person we saw in s1. And it doesn't get better. He spends the rest of the season bullying Larys, punishing Aegon's Kingsguard, before having a holy shit moment when he flies to Dragonstone.
Then, we see a glimpse of vulnerability when he breaks down and asks Helaena to fly with him to war.
"Come with me? To Harrenhal? We will lay waste to Daemon and his army. Let our enemies see that we will answer outrage with outrage."
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"
You can tell this moment isn't just about strategy. He feels alone. Alicent has already called him out on his violence, and he no longer has the might to secure a victory against Rhaenyra. He needs Helaena, because he needs family, someone to fight in his corner and lend him emotional, not just martial support.
But she refuses. Calls him out on burning Aegon. And, ofc, the second he feels his insecurity prodded, he turns to violence.
HELAENA: And if I refuse? Will you burn me, as you did Aegon?
AEMOND: That is a lie.
HELAENA: I saw it. You burned him. And you let him fall.
AEMOND: What you say is treason.
HELAENA: Aegon will be King again. He's yet to see victory. He sits on a wooden throne. And you... you'll be dead. You were swallowed up by the God's eye. And you were never seen again.
AEMOND: I could have you killed...
HELAENA: It wouldn't change anything.
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 8, "The Queen Who Ever Was"
This moment is especially devastating because she not only rejects him, she basically tells him the thing he fears the most will happen. That he, the great and powerful second son who has worked his entire life to be the best warrior, dragonrider, scholar will be forgotten. All his efforts were in vain, and in the end, the brother he thought unworthy will be victorious while he ends up a corpse.
It's a fantastic moment: I just wish it weren't so hollow. I just wish we got to see him wrestling with what he did to Aegon, feeling guilt, feeling doubt. Rationalizing to himself how he'd done what was necessary, how he just needs to beat Daemon and the war would be won. But that doesn't happen. We're left to headcanon everything, do Ryan's goddamn job for him while he acts like the show is a masterpiece.
Season 3 has potential when it comes to Aemond's arc. He'll be going to Harrenhal, and will likely be forced to confront his past and the horrible things he's done. My theory is that he'll have a reverse Daemon arc. While s2 Daemon owned up to how horrible he'd been to those he loved the most, and made peace with the fact he was not made to wear the crown, Aemond will do the opposite. He'll reject the prophecy Helaena gave him, attempt to fight his fate, possibly using Alys' magic—all while inadvertantly hurdling toward it.
However, this can only happen if the writers actually write a consistent story where things matter. But given their track record, I don't really have a lot of hope.
Continuing my rants from earlier (pt1 and pt2 are here), I want to tackle something people have complained about when it comes to the show, which also contributed to it sucking ass: timeskips.
Now, on their own, timeskips are fine, and can work if they are incorporated into the narrative well. But the issue is, HOTD didn't do them well. For the most part, s1 was made well enough for the audience to passively accept the timeskips, and headcanon away any issues that arose as a result (characters changing motivations and personalities are more easily explained as them maturing off screen over the years).
But, I'm here to posit that all the timeskips did was hide writing inconsistencies that were always there. And you can easily see that in s2—the plot has slowed down, and we are following events in real time. And the characters still act in ways that don't match up with their environment and the events that have transpired.
Let me explain.
S1: A Lackluster Speedrun
If I remember the BTS stuff correctly, George wanted to start HOTD during the reign of Jaehaerys so the audience could understand the context for the Dance properly. Ryan and the studio rightfully shot that down, cause starting the show with one set of characters only to then move on to another one just to get to the event you actually want to adapt isn't a recipe for a good show. And I agree.
Still, just the story of the Dance spans decades, and they needed to condense that into something that would be TV friendly.
So they settled on the format we got: five eps to introduce the first round of characters, follow them in their youth and set up the main conflict (Rhaenyra being named heir, Vizzy remarrying to Alicent, Daemon stirring shit, etc). Then two eps to cover their early adulthood and introduce the second round of main players (black and green kids), and the last three eps to cover the start of the Dance itself.
And in theory, this is fine. In practice, however...
Just take Alicent and Rhaenyra. The two of them start out as well established character archetypes: the shy rule-follower and spunky rebel. In the beginning, Alicent barely has any motivations of her own. She's a pawn Otto pushes into a marriage she doesn't want, who spends four episodes trying to fit in with her new 'family', not because she wants to, but because thats her duty as a wife. Her only consistent motivation is her relationship with Rhaenyra and the repeated attempts she makes to fix it.
And even those are extremely spotty, because one ep, they're feuding, and in the next they've seemingly made up. We get no context on how this happened, or why, but are instead left to headcanon it as a gradual rekindling of their friendship that occured during the several month/year mini time skips we get during the first five eps.
Which works, cause the rest of the show is well-written enough for the audience overlook the fact the writers just opted out of doing an actual character progressions
. We've got no time for that, we've got dragon battles to get to!
And this, right here, will become a trend later, so keep it in mind.
Regardless of these roadblocks, Alicent ends her pre-time skip arc as Rhaenyra's enemy Furthermore, her post-time skip self is consistent with this—we see her grow from a repressed, jaded girl into a repressed, jaded woman who has spent 10 years fighting to undermine Rhaenyra at court. Her ep6-7 personality is consistent with everything we've learned about her thus far (at least until we get to episode 8 and the writers just chuck all that out the window lol)
Not so for Rhaenyra. Pre-time skip, she's a rebellious, but insecure girl who has spent her life living in the shadow of an unborn son. She watched her mother suffer and die in childbirth, which in turn made her afraid of marriage, and kids. Pre-time skip, we see her slowly graduate from that insecure rebel who is certain Viserys will replace her with Alicent's son, to a proactive, cunning player who leverages what little power she has to get her way.
But then, timeskip happens, and she's suddenly a completely different person. She's a Mother, and a passive, meek woman who relies completely on Viserys for protection. She has no friends, and no allies at court (except Lord Casswell, who just... exists), despite presumably sitting the council and doing politics for 10 years. Pre-time skip, we see her grow to accept marriage as a duty she has to perform in order to preserve her crown, but we never see her stance on motherhood change. She was deathly afraid of birth and pregnancy because of what happened to Aemma, and we don't get any explanation for how she overcame this and became such a loving parent.
And yes, you can file this under the "she grew and matured," box because it's been ten years. But it still feels like too much of a departure. Especially when you consider how plucky she was in her youth. Pre-time skip Rhaenyra gets Otto fired for meddling in her business. Post-time skip Rhaenyra cowers when Alicent refuses her offer to marry Jace to Helaena, and runs away the second the Harwin/Krispy incident happens, and people start whispering too much about her.
It's genuinely baffling she lasted this long on the council if Alicent is just able to put her down whenever she wants to. IMO, pre time-skip Rhaenyra would have RUSHED to use the fight as a pretext to get Cole kicked out of the Kingsguard. It boggles the mind that this asshole is still around after beating a noble to death at a wedding (another thing that's not explained btw). His favoritism toward the green boys, and insinuations about the parentage of Rhaenyra's sons should have been the final straw. But no. Rhaenyra folds immediately, all but proving Alicent right.
I love Emma and their performance as Rhaenyra, but I get why some people were against the actor swap when the timeskip came. The issue is, they were displacing the frustration they felt with the writing onto the actor and their performance (because we know, Emma can slay beast-mode if the script lets them: just look at what they do in the Driftmark episode. Rhaenyra, turning Aemond's crippling to her advantage, and not only getting Luke off, scott free, but making it illegal to call her kids bastards? Ugh, POETRY)
And the passivity continues. She grows a spine only for the Driftmark episode, before swapping Viserys' protection for Daemon. He basically becomes her shield for the rest of the season, the active player who appropriates all her book actions. He kills Vaemond on his own, he leads the blacks into preparing for war post usurpation. Rhaenyra just kinda exists in the background, with her only notable deed being arranging Jace and Luke's betrothals.
Worse, she once again folds to Alicent after Vizzy asks her nicely, and genuinely toasts her at dinner—even though she and Otto helped Vaemond orchestrate the damn petition to take Driftmark from Luke not a few hours ago. Alicent had her walk to the royal apartments after giving birth, and has spent years spreading rumors about her kids being bastards. But nope. Vizzy said to be nice, and they were friends that one time, so we have to be nice.
Again, no explanation for this shift, other than the vague 'it's been 16 years, she's a mature Mother now'.
S1 ends on a promise of a violent turning point, when we see Rhaenyra unravel after getting the news of Luke's death. And from there, we as the audience expect her to finally go on the warpath. Except, well... she doesn't. And the rest of the characters don't progress much either.
S2: It Was Always There
Remember what I said about the writers using timeskips to just wave away having to write actual character arcs? Welp, here we are. S2 has come, and this has become glaringly obvious.
There's no time skips to rely on, so we get the privilege of seeing characters change and adapt before our very eyes. Except, they don't.
I'll demonstrate this by using everyone's favorite one-eyed warcriminal. At the start of s1, Aemond is introduced as the shy underdog. He is bullied by his elder brother and nephews because he lacks a dragon, and risks his life to claim the biggest nuke in the world at great personal cost—his eye. His crippling at Driftmark turns him into a hardened, ruthless individual who stands in stark contrast to his philandering older brother.
He's competent, dutiful, loyal, pragmatic. A certified anime badass complete with his very own "I studied the blade," monologue in s1 (when I tell you I died laughing when this came up, you have no idea). However, there's also a hint of complexity in how he reacts to Luke at Storm's End. You see him get angry, lose his shit. He delights in tormenting his former bully on his much larger dragon, exercising power he's never felt in his youth over the person who traumatized him. And yet, when the accident happens and Vhagar kills Luke against his wishes, he looks distraught. A petrified, little boy who knows he did something terrible, and knows he will be haunted by this accident for the rest of his life.
So you'd think the show would capitalize on Luke's death to develop his character in real time, right?
Lol, nope. What do you think this is, Game of Thrones season 1?
The show deliberately starts some time after Storm's End (sure, lets chuck in another time skip. As if we haven't had enough of those already 🙃). Aemond and Alicent seem to have fought over this, and its implied she's blaming him for not just the killing, but the war starting. Which, if we're going by Fire and Blood, is technically the truth.
"And with his death the war of ravens and envoys and marriage pacts came to an end, and the war of fire and blood began in earnest.”
GRRM, Fire and Blood
However, her behaviour barely reflects this. She scolds him during the Council meeting, sounding more like a mother reproaching her toddler for breaking a vase than someone who has basically cut ties with her son, and proclaimed him a monster (you think this reading extreme? In ep4, she tells Criston: you know what Aemond is, implying she thinks he's evil)
"And Vhagar is needed here, to deter Rhaenyra from attacking. In retribution, for the death of her son."
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 1, Blood and Cheese.
Later, in the same episode, she defends him to Otto, minimizing, and even justifying his actions.
ALICENT: "Aemond is angry... Rhaenyra's son took his eye and was never punished for it. What he did... however, vicious—"
OTTO: "The caprice of youth."
House of the Dragon, Season 2, Episode 1, Blood and Cheese.
Compare this to her book reaction and Otto's iconic line.
"If [Aemond] thought to receive a here's welcome, he was disappointed. Queen Alicent went pale when she heard what he had done, crying, “Mother have mercy on us all.” Nor was Ser Otto pleased. “You only lost one eye,” he is reported to have said. “How could you be so blind?”
GRRM, Fire and Blood
Not only is she aghast, but Aemond is forever remembered as a Kinslayer—a terrible moniker, that is associated with the greatest taboo in planetos. Except the show shows none of this. No one explains the significance of kinslaying, nor does anyone seem particularly bothered by what Aemond did. His family, bar Alicent and Otto have no reaction, and he isn't called a kinslayer once. But we are supposed to assume that this event and his fight with Alicent have destroyed Aemond, and pushed him toward his later betrayal. How? Because we see him crying at the brothel to the Madame.
S1 specifically established that Aemond hadn't seen Madam Sylvi since he was a child.
"How you've grown..."
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 9, "The Green Council"
So the only option left to us is to assume he'd gone back to her after the incident with Luke, likely to seek emotional support he couldn't get at home because of his fight with Alicent. And we have to assume these sessions are about Alicent because the framing is screaming it.
Like he's deliberately choosing an older woman, who was also the one who sexually assaulted him in his teens (albeit unwillingly since she is a sex worker and in no position to refuse princes). We never see him explicitly have sex with her, just lie naked in her lap, in the fetal position, like a baby. At one point, he's even served a cup of hot milk. Like Ryan might as well have included Oedipus bursting through the wall, screaming "He wants mommy!" because that's how obvious it was.
And that's the extent of his development. He cries to Sylvi for two eps, expressing how he regrets killing Luke. Then, he has no reaction to the death of Jaehaerys, who was killed in response to the murder he committed. Aegon humiliates him in a brothel, for no reason other than him being a petty frat boy, which somehow then translates to him choosing to betray him at Rook's Rest, and he spends the remainder of the season as his cringey book villain self with no development save maybe the last ep.
Now, on its own, I don't mind the Rook's Rest betrayal. The set-up for it is there, but the issue is, consistency and execution. Aemond pivots from no screen time and barely any development to a moustache twirling villain screaming at Tyland about being 'summoned' in ep6.
And all because his character development happened off screen, and we as the audience are meant to headcanon the exact reasons behind it with what little information we were given. We have no time to sit with him, and pick his brain, because big dragon battles need to happen. He doesn't grieve his nephew or express any thoughts about his death, just jumps straight from an overconfident, bullied boy with an ego complex to villain of the week. And this time, there is no time skip to justify this rapid shift.
And the pattern repeats with most every character (Helaena is the biggest victim of this IMO, with her having no reaction to Jaehaerys' death, then somehow developing her powers off screen, before ending the season as Bran 2.0, a meta commenter there to remind us that we're watching a show with a predetermined conclusion where nothing matters, so the characters should just do stuff, and not care)
And yeah, yeah, the show was cut down from 10 eps to 8, but... would the longer runtime really matter that much when the bulk of the season was still wasted watching Rhaenyra do nothing at Council, Daemon trip balls for the tenth time in a row, and Alicent swim in a random lake for lols? The show was shortened, and yet the season drags on, tacked with pointless filler scenes that contribute nothing to the plot. Vital, character development happens off screen, and supporting characters are left feeling like hollow props there to fill the screen (seriously, what is the purpose of Rhaena's arc? Like honestly? Its just a repeat of Aemond's arc from s1, except dragged across the season to pad the runtime). Because when it comes to writing consistent character development, the writers fail.
They sacrifice logical through lines in favor of their predetermined conclusion that contradicts even the things they established before. Except this time, they don't have the convenient excuse of time skips to account for their shoddy writing. It's there, out in the open, and it sucks.
Inspired by a recent bullet point breakdown of HOTD's flaws (here it is) I wanted to do my own lil breakdown of why this show sucked, even in season 1. Because yes, compared to s2, s1 was gold, but that's not saying much. Especially when you realize those cracks from s1 directly contributed to s2 sucking ass so much.
So let me point out the biggest flaw in this show by analyzing the one character that is arguably the biggest victim (aside from the main female protagonists): Rhaenys Targaryen.
What's the Problem Here?
Consistency. That's it. A logical, character progression that is in line with a character's established personality and the events surrounding them. None of which is what HOTD gives us.
So let's start.
First, let's outline book to show changes. For one, show Rhaenys was given specifically Valyrian features, while her book self had Baratheon black hair which yes, did play a later role when discussing the parentage of Rhaenyra's kids. Second, the succession from the books was simplified, because F&B made a point to flag that Rhaenys wasn't just fighting on her own behalf but also, for her son, Laenor.
This change was obviously made so show only watchers can follow along more easily and so that the main theme of HOTD can be put front and center: misogyny. Rhaenys gets passed over cause she's a woman and the crown goes to a man. Simple premise.
Now we get to show Rhaenys herself. When HOTD starts, she's presented to us as this no-nonsense strong woman who feels a little jaded over how she got shafted in the succession. In s1ep2 she and Rhaneyra talk about Rhaenyra being named Viserys heir, and she gives her this line:
"Men would sooner put the realm to the torch, than see a woman ascend the Iron Throne."
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 2 – “The Rogue Prince.”
I know people complain about her portrayal on the show because her book self was a staunch Rhaenyra supporter, but given the context they have presented to us, and Rhaenys' personality thus far, it makes sense. This is a woman who was spurned by the entire realm on account of her sex. And its this event that sparked an almost hyper awareness about the society she lives in and the rules that govern it.
"Whether it's to my daughter or someone else's, your father will remarry sooner than late. His new wife will produce new heirs, and chances are better than not one of those will be male. And when that boy comes of age and your father has passed, the men of the realm will expect him to be heir, not you. Because that is the order of things."
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 2 – “The Rogue Prince.”
This awareness is exactly the reason she's hesitant to betroth Laenor to Rhaenyra, because she knows her ascension won't come without problems—primarily because Aegon is already here.
"Rhaenyra's succession will be challenged. Knives will come out, for her, her husband and their heirs."
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 5 – “We Light the Way.”
Now, I know people hate the fact the boys were made obvious bastards (it needed to happen so casuals would get it. I'm sorry, but that's the truth. The average person really isn't that invested to pick up on subtle clues, IMO. Don't believe me? I've spoken to casuals who completely forgot Aegon and Rhaenyra are half siblings). However, seeing as the show already changed Rhaenyra's relationship with the Velaryons (read: Laena), Rhaenys being cold and distant toward the Strong boys is what we got. And hear me it—it could have worked.
Given the show context I just outlined, and Rhaenys being hyper aware of the kind of society she lives in, she would know the rumors about Rhaenyra's sons would eventually invite a succession crisis. In universe, bastards aren't just hated because of blind prejudice—they're also hated because they represent a potential threat to the main line of succession.
As Catelyn put it:
"And in time the boy would take the oath as well. He would father no sons who might someday contest with Catelyn's own grandchildren for Winterfell."
AGOT, Catelyn II
She doesn't just hate Jon cause he's a representation of Ned's affair and lies—but because she fears he and his bloodline might contest her children's descendants and their claim to Winterfell. Like we as modern audiences know this is wrong, and that bastard kids should get the same inheritance as legitimate ones. But this is feudalism. A highly stratified society that was built on inequality. Them giving bastards acknowledgement would be forking over their ironclad grip on power and privilege, which is obviously not happening.
Therefore, it would be perfectly reasonable for Rhaenys to have the same fear—especially since the show cut Rhaenyra's friendship with Laena, and their decision to betroth their children to one another when they were toddlers (I will NEVER forgive you for this, Ryan. NEVERRRRRR)
And wouldn't you know it, her belief would get vindicated; Corlys isn't even dead when Vaemond comes to try and contest Driftmark's inheritance. In the books, he isn't even the only one. There's multiple Velaryon cousins, and the struggle for the seat doesn't even stop after the dance, because when Alyn takes Driftmark, he's also opposed because he's still viewed as a bastard, despite getting legitimized. It's a recipe for an interfamiliar civil war, a la the Dance, except on a micro scale. And Rhaenys would have every right to be pissed off, because her family could end up killed.
In fact, for all she knows, her family did get killed.
Which brings me to the show's biggest fumble; Laenor.
Like yeah, I get it. Bury your Gays sucks, and we should do it less. The issue is a) they did it once by killing Joffrey Lonmouth and b) it fucks up the plot for no reason.
In the books, Laenor's death is ruled as an accident, though there is speculation that Daemon might be responsible. Rhaenyra is never implicated in this, despite the fact she and Daemon marry some months later. So Corlys and Rhaenys have no reason to revoke their support for them.
The show decided to chuck this out the window by not only having Daemyra orchestrate a fakeout death for him, but also, lean into the rumors about their involvement to boost their dangerous reputation. Which, okay, but... that inadvertently fucks up their relationship with Corlys and Rhaenys.
Because if the realm thinks them responsible for Laenor's death, the Velaryons have no reason to support them. Rhaenys should be pissed and should rightfully distrust Rhaenyra.
She should logically have no desire to uphold her claim and should certainly want to refuse Rhaenyra's offer to betroth Baela and Rhaena to Jace and Luke.
Except... she doesn't. She takes the offer and bails Rhaenyra out why exactly? Because she said she'd make her granddaughter Queen? Rhaena, Lady of Driftmark? We established she's aware Rhaenyra's claim will be contested and that her children will be in danger. That alone should make her want to keep Baela and Rhaena out of this mess as much as possible (especially since this shit has seen her family get shafted over and over again) let alone her suspecting Rhaenyra killed her son.
But no. She just accepts this offer and is fine and dandy, even going so far as to bend the knee to Rhaenyra cause she's... trying to avoid war? Meanwhile, in episode 2, she was telling her that her ascending would mean war. She should know, better than anyone, that the only way Rhaenyra, and by extension her granddaughters keep their heads is if Rhaenyra fights and wins. And Rhaenyra isn't winning by asking for the crown nicely. Because the realm already sees her as a weak and inferior woman not fit to rule. She needs to fight and be proactive to prove them wrong.
But no. Rhaenys sets aside all her previous beliefs and bends the knee cause Rhaenyra has proven she's the arbiter of peace. Even though her inaction is fucking up the blacks.
It's absolute bullshit. And it's a trend that continues into season 2.
Her season 2 self basically exists to spit out bars and advocate for peace. She undermines the King Consort for suggesting a perfectly reasonable strategy of taking two of their best dragons to kill Vhagar cause Rhaenyra didn't okay it.
In s1ep9, she mocked Alicent for being patriarchy's poster girl, while unironically advising Rhaenyra to do the same.
ALICENT: We do not rule. But we may yet guide the men that do. Gently… away from violence and sure destruction and instead toward peace.
....
RHAENYS: And yet you toil still in service to men.
Your father, your husband, your son.
You desire not to be free, but to make a window in the wall of your prison.
Have you never imagined yourself… on the Iron Throne?
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 9 – “The Green Council”
Not even three eps later, when Rhaenyra is almost killed by Ser Arryk, and the greens are on the march, she advises Rhaenyra to seek peace. Be the meek and gutless woman who lacks the stomach to lead, and only exists to manage warmongering men—aka exactly what the men already think Rhaenyra is. Exactly what Alicent is doing. Rhaenyra might as well fork over her crown now, because she's proving herself totally unworthy of it.
And yes, peace is good, and Rhaenys would know diplomacy is an effective tool to resolve a crisis. But in the context of the situation, that ship has sailed. Rhaenyra has lost a son. She was almost assassinated, and all symbols of legitimacy belong to Aegon. You don't come back from that without a fight, especially in a medieval society. Daemon is shat on for being a warmonger on the show, when objectively, he's the only one acting like a medieval Lord:
RHAENYRA: So I should declare war because I'm angry?
DAEMON: No, because it's your duty as Queen to crush rebellion.
House of the Dragon, Season 1, Episode 10 – “The Black Queen.”
And he's right. Monarchs need to put down rebellions and remove challengers to secure their claims. This was standard practice IRL in feudal times.
But Rhaenys somehow forgets this, along with everything else from s1, and not only advises Rhaenyra to continue being a wet dishrag, but also risk her life to make peace with the one woman who has no political power to end this war. As the Dowager, Alicent lost all privileges when Viserys died, and is basically just a relic at Aegon's court. And Rhaenys SHOULD know this. But no. Because the writers needed her to appear like the rational, arbiter of peace, contrasted with the warmongering men she urges Rhaenyra to go toward another rational arbiter of peace she criticized not three episodes ago for being an arbiter of peace.
I don't even want to mention the fiasco with Addam and Alyn. S1 was all about her being cold toward the Strong boys because they're illegitimates, only for her to then turn around and accept her husband's bastards in s2. Why? Why does she have a problem with the Strongs but not Addam and Alyn?
Cause Rhaenyra had them, and not her son? So it's okay for a dude to have illegitimate kids, but not the woman? They're not Laenor's blood, ergo, Laenor's adoption is invalid, meaning that only the man's bloodline is important, not the woman's? Why advocate for Baela to be heir to Driftmark then, if her bloodline is ultimately inferior? Why support a woman Queen, if her bastard line is going to compromise the crown and Driftmark?
It's definitely not Catelyn reasoning because Addam and Alyn threaten the legitimate Velaryon line of succession just as much, if not more (especially if we're only looking at Baela and Rhaena as being the last blood-related successors. They're girls, so any sliver of legitimacy given to Addam and Alyn would put them over the twins in the eyes of many people). So why be fine with them and not the Strong boys?
Cause Corlys didn't publicly acknowledge Addam and Alyn? Not publicly acknowledging them doesn't mean they also can't threaten the line. Besides, she doesn't know whether Corlys will give them a boost. He's been chilling with them more, and her seeming 'acceptance' and him not rushing to name Joffrey after Luke died (why this hasn't happened is beyond me, cause Joff is the next in line) might lead him to acknowledge them, and thus make them proper challenges to the Driftwood throne. So what is the reason?
The reason is, whatever the plot needs it to be. She flip flops from episode to episode, being a one-liner spewing, badass girl's girl the writers need at any given moment. All so the women on the show can be made into the ultimate good.
But all this talk about motivation, and I've barely brought up Baela and Rhaena.
Can you blame me? Cause the show didn't bring them up either.
Baela and Rhaena could have been the perfect motivation for Corlys and Rhaenys to continue supporting Rhaenyra. And all the writers had to do was remember how medieval society functions.
First of all, why tf is Rhaenys allowed to arrange marriages for them? They're her granddaughters, sure, but Daemon is their father, and under Westerosi law, he has complete control over them—that includes deciding who they're going to marry. So, he may allow Rhaenys to arrange matches for them as a courtesy, but at the end of the day, he has veto power to deny any and all suggestions she makes.
And here's how to fix this problem. Have Daemon and Rhaenyra decide to betroth Baela and Rhaena to Jace and Luke to counteract Vaemond's bid for Driftmark. Have Rhaenys protest this, for fear of their safety, but then have Rhaenyra remind her that Baela and Rhaena are Daemon's girls, and he gets to decide who they marry. Furthermore, because of Rhaenyra's marriage to him, they are forever tied to the black side. This would effectively force Rhaenys and Corlys to support Rhaenyra because she'd be holding Baela and Rhaena over their heads—their last living family.
But of course, that would require making Rhaenyra more morally grey and villainous, and she had to remain blameless—even though they could have easily added a layer of complexity by having Rhaenyra throw back Rhaenys' decision to force Laenor to marry her, despite knowing his sexuality. She could also bring up her refusal to accept kids who he claimed and loved as his own, and you know, tell her how she didn't actually kill him and just sent him across the narrow sea???
Instead, we get this lackluster mess with Rhaenys flipflopping between episodes to end up in a place that makes absolutely no sense, and the plot itself says she shouldn't be at. But that's HOTD for you. Messy, inconsistent, contrived and forced, to the point where it can't even commit to it's own established writing.
A Character Study: Aegon II from House of the Dragon
3k+ words. Just a compilation of my thoughts concerning the character of Aegon Targaryen II. I'm not trying to debate or prove a point, I just wanted to pen down my views of him. Also, I did not mention Daeron because I wanted to focus on the TV show.
Beware, spoilers.
Aegon is a product of abandonment — by his father, mother, and his elder sister — and his personality holds all the signs of it. Viserys, for all his dreams of having a male heir, neglects the boy when he finally is born. The king instead showers all his affection on Rhaenyra, the only surviving child born out of the marriage with the true love his life, the late Queen Aemma.
Rhaenyra sees Aegon only as a rival and threat to her claim on the Iron Throne. In the book, the only reason she even agreed to marry Laenor Velaryon after the infamous Daemon scandal was because Viserys threatened to replace Aegon as his heir if she didn’t comply. Aegon's her competitor and nothing more. Rhaenyra makes it obvious when she makes a point to address him only as half-brother (she addresses all of Alicent’s children as half-siblings, for that matter).
As for Alicent, Otto Hightower was removed as Hand of the King shortly after Aegon’s birth — an event that Alicent blames Rhaenyra for. She’s now left in a court full of schemers; she has zero allies save for Ser Criston Cole and Larys Strong (the latter who she treats with trepidation because, let’s face it, he’s a creepy guy and his job as professional torturer doesn’t help). Her new position as Queen only isolates her further. To top it off, her husband blatantly favors her step-daughter over both her and her new baby boy, which only fuels the belief that Aegon’s life would be at risk should Rhaenyra succeed him.
Alicent is now feeling more alone than ever. I also think a part of her saw Aegon as the final event that ended her childhood once and for all. He represents a time of significant losses to her — loss of her maidenhood, loss of her father, loss of her bond with her childhood friend. She feels deeply betrayed by everyone she had been close to. By Rhaenyra, who lied to her about Daemon/Criston despite swearing on Aemma’s grave (which holds so much weight for Alicent because both her and Rhaenyra bonded over the deaths of their mothers). By Viserys, who married her when his heart still belonged to Aemma. By Otto, who had a hand in making her marriage with Viserys happen and then left her to raise her son — his grandson — all on her own.
So Aegon had an absent father, an unfriendly older sister, and a mother who feels paranoid and isolated. Aegon may have only been a toddler but I don’t think he was clueless to the woes of his mother and tensions happening in court. Children always pick up on emotions.
It was the perfect recipe for creating the irresponsible young man he would grow up to be.
Now we’re going to be stepping into headcannon land, but bear with me. I’m imagining Aegon as a young boy in the throne room. He’s hiding behind Alicent’s skirts because I think young Aegon would’ve been a scared little kid. Growing up in court amidst all the animosity would have him both confused and anxious all the time. He’d blame himself for his father’s neglect and his mother’s worried eyes and frown lines. His older sister also hates him for apparently no reason too, at least according to Aegon. His mother whispers to him that the Iron Throne would be his one day, but soon he notices the cuts that his father gets from sitting on the damned chair. Cuts that always fester and that the maesters would eventually have to leech. He sees Viserys getting weaker and weaker each time he sits the throne.
That’s when Aegon decides that he doesn’t want the throne. He doesn’t want that fate. I think Aegon is smarter than people give him credit for. He sees the Iron Throne for what it really is: a decoration and a cutting hazard. More importantly, he sees it as an extension of Viserys. The Iron Throne = the king = Viserys = the father who doesn’t care for him.
Well, fuck that, young Aegon thinks. I won’t care about you either. Fuck you and everything you stand for.
So he lets all his inhibitions run wild. I think it would start with small childhood acts of defiance — like boisterously interrupting important meetings around the Red Keep and playing rude pranks on lords and servants alike. Eventually he’d discover the secret passageways and he’d sneak off to Flea Bottom, pick fights with the locals just because he can, and get high at the Ale houses when he’s supposed to be studying.
What started as just a fun little drink to loosen up becomes his lifeline. Being sober opens up the path for analytical thought, and Aegon doesn’t want that, not with all the constant anxiety he feels. He wants to be far away from his reality, from his father, from his Targaryen heritage and everything it meant.
So he drowns himself in cup after cup. One addiction leads to another, and pretty soon he finds pleasure and fighting rings added to his list of addictions too. This boy is an adrenaline junkie, and he chases high after high — be it from wine, from flesh, or from violence — just to keep his mind off the fact that he's a firstborn Targaryen prince.
And if Alicent yells at him, what of it? All the slaps to his face only meant that she cares about him. Isn’t that the most important thing? Aegon thinks. The more debauched his activities became, the more she cared. (Aegon adopts the "Red Means I Love You" mentality).
I also think Aegon is jealous of Rhaenyra, sort of like how Aemond is jealous of him. Rhaenyra's irresponsibility is swept under the rug. Aegon, on the other hand, is treated as the family disappointment. No matter how many bastards she births, Viserys continues to dote upon her. No matter how many rumors circulate around King's Landing of her and her paramour, Harwin Strong, Viserys' love for Rhaenyra is unconditional. In other words, she easily receives what Aegon had always coveted.
As for his relationship with Jace and Luke — Aegon couldn’t care less that they were Rhaenyra’s bastards. Status and symbols mean nothing to him; he’s far happier in the taverns of Flea Bottom with the common people than he ever was with the stuffy nobles in the Red Keep. He has no quarrel with them, and they laugh along to his jokes and pranks. At least they know how to have fun, he thinks. Better Jace and Luke than shy, quiet Aemond who keeps to his studies (the fucking nerd) and weird Helaena who only talks about bugs.
Remember, Aegon feels awfully detached from his family. Aemond and Helaena definitely felt detached also; they too were neglected by Viserys. Each of them coped by withdrewing — Aegon to his brothels and alehouses, Aemond to the library, and Helaena to her interest in insects.
But Rhaenyra’s side has never quite felt like “family” to him — Jace and Luke look nothing like him, while with Aemond and Helaena, Aegon sees his own silver hair and purple eyes staring right back at him, symbols of his Targaryen heritage. I think he truly did consider Jace and Luke as “friends”, or at the very least, playmates for a time. He teams up with them to bully Aemond, whom he could not feel more distant from, despite being closer in blood to Aemond than he with Jace and Luke.
Aemond's a twat, Aegon justifies. Helaena's a twat too. They both represent family and duty to him, especially Helaena, who is a constant reminder of the duties he must perform as prince and firstborn son. Aegon just wants to love and be loved, and he knows he can't give that to Helaena, nor she to him. "We don't have anything in common" is the excuse he uses for not wanting to marry her, if only to lie to himself that they have everything in common. They have the same last name, the same hair and eyes, the same blood of the dragon running through their veins. And they will be stuck in the same loveless marriage together.
So when Alicent scolds him (Rhaenyra’s sons won’t be your play things forever…We are family… out there, we protect our own), the full weight of what she’s saying doesn’t hit him, not immediately…
Until Lucerys takes out Aemond's eye.
Aegon’s not stupid — he knows how Viserys gives Rhaenyra and her children free passes for everything. But I don’t think he realized that it also meant the blacks would get away with maiming his brother, the king’s own son, too. The moment Viserys was more angry over the fact that his grandsons were called bastards than his son losing an eye was when Alicent’s words truly cemented into his mind. We are family. We protect our own.
(Jace and Luke never seemed sorry for their actions too. Were these the boys I sided with against my own brother? Aegon asks himself.)
Aegon would be good at hiding it, but he’d feel immense guilt for not being there to protect his little brother. Viserys had proved to be undependable, so as the eldest son, it was now his job to protect his family.
He's relunctant, he admits. He can't connect with Aemond — his little brother was duty this, responsibility that, and frankly, it was annoying. He had never really understood Helaena (she's autistic coded). But Aegon is mad terrified of Viserys now. If his own father had threatened to cut out the tongue of anyone — noble or otherwise — who speaks a word against the blacks, and had refused to take justice for a Targaryen prince... then is anyone in his fraction truly safe?
So Aegon stops bullying Aemond. Not that he had any cause left to bully Aemond with. The little boy had claimed the meanest, baddest dragon in the world and Aemond reminded everyone of this fact whenever he got the chance. But Aegon starts keeping his jesting to a minimum, and he decides to leave Aemond in peace. At least, for most of the time. Except for when he took it upon himself to teach Aemond "how to be a man" — Aegon's version of sex education — something that Alicent would scorn if she ever found out but Aemond will eventually marry and someone needs to prepare him, Aegon thinks. Plus, it wouldn't hurt if my brother loosens up. He's all work and no play.
(And when Aemond turns 13, Aegon takes him to a brothel on the Streets of Silk. Aegon thinks he's doing his little bro a favor. Aemond would never forgive him for it — but that's a story for another time.)
Aegon also gives in and marries Helaena. Better me than Jacaerys, he thinks. If Helaena married into the blacks, Rhaenyra would always take Jace's side. The blacks didn't have a sense of justice and Aegon wouldn't subject his sister to that. I'm sure that deep down, he feels protective of her in a brotherly way, although he doesn't show it. He continues his debauchery despite knowing that it could harm her reputation but wine and women is where Aegon draws the line. I'll do what mother asks but I can't give up this.
(Aegon may think he would protect Helaena from the world but he fails to see that Helaena may need protection from him. Aemond sees this and steps up for the job.)
Aegon is also holding onto the hope that people would stop seeing him as heir if he acts unworthy enough. But in the attempt to distance himself from Viserys, Aegon turns out like his father in the process. He becomes an absent father to his children with Helaena. Good thing Uncle Aemond is there to help with the kids tho.
In spite of it all, things had started to fall into rhythm in the Red Keep for the Green kids. Aegon does his duty while still continuing his depravities, Helaena dedicates her time to her needlework and her babies, Aemond studies and trains with all his might to compensate for his lack of an eye. All is well, or as well as it could ever be.
Until the matter of Driftmark's succession brings Rhaenyra’s clan back to the Red Keep.
While the petitions were being held, Aegon was indifferent to it all. To be clear, he didn't want Luke — the bastard who maimed his brother — to get Driftmark, but he wouldn't complain if Luke did, because it would only strengthen Rhaenyra's claim to the throne, thus making his own claim less valid. Aegon attends the ceremony and treats it with the morbid amusement of a man who had nothing more to lose.
Then Daemon beheads Vaemond. That's when Aegon is reminded of who he is really dealing with. The blacks are no longer just Rhaenyra and her children — Prince Daemon, the notorious Rogue Prince, was now added to their list of foes. It was clear to everyone: the price for challenging Rhaenyra was immediate death. No trial, no mercy, no justice.
When Jace asks Helaena for a dance during dinner, Aegon’s protectiveness kicks in. He looks at Aemond, like, are you seeing this shit bro?
This bastard thinks his family can get away with maiming my brother and he wants to dance with my wife as if nothing happened?
When the fight breaks out between Jace and Aemond, Aegon sees Luke rushing to Jace's side before stepping in to stop the boy from reaching Aemond. We protect our own.
I think that afterwards, Aegon was hit with the overwhelming reality that he had, more or less, managed to ignore for the past few years. It was easier to ignore the danger he was in with Rhaenyra gone. But now that she was back... and after witnessing Daemon's recklessness in the throne room...
He sees his own head in the place of Vaemond’s. This could be my future, he thinks. Aegon wants to save himself before it was too late.
To Aegon, running away probably seemed like a win-win situation. Rhaenyra gets the crown she wants, and Aegon gets his freedom. It’s better for everyone this way, he reasons.
“I will find a ship and sail away, never to be found,” he pleads Aemond, grasping his brother’s face with both hands. He’s desperate, and he’s hoping that his brother would understand. It’s not until Ser Crispy Cream arrives that Aegon ultimately gives in and abandons his plans.
“The queen awaits,” the knight says.
In the book, Criston Cole and Aegon spend time exchanging a few more words.
“What kind of a brother steals his sister’s birthright?” Aegon protests.
It’s not until Ser Criston explains to him that the lives of his mother, brother, wife, and children will be in danger that Aegon finally relents. The book made Aegon’s motivations behind his acceptance of his fate much clearer than the show, but I thought the series incorporated a cleverer, show-not-tell way to explain Aegon’s compliance.
Think of it like this: Aegon’s holding on to the face of the brother whom he failed to protect seven years ago. Then his mother’s sworn protector — the knight who had been more attentive to him than his own father had, the man who watched him grow up — approaches him, putting an arm around his shoulder, saying “the queen awaits”.
At the mention of his mother, Aegon comes to his senses again. We are family, we protect our own.
If Aegon fled, he would be leaving his family to the wrath of Daemon and Rhaenyra. The only way he can ensure their protection is to stay and become king. It’s the Targaryen Hunger Games. Neither will live while the other survives.
Aegon decides that he would not make the mistake that he made seven years ago at Driftmark. He lets go of his brother and follows Ser Criston.
In stories, heroes separate themselves from villains by being the ones who act out of love instead of ambition. Aegon’s morals are questionable, and he certainly is no saint, but his last act in HOTD season one — the one that would change the course of history — was done out of love.
Why else would he ask “Do you love me?” while Alicent is lecturing him in the carriage on the way to his coronation. He’s saying Look at me mother. I don’t care about the politics, I am doing this just because I love you and I need to know, I’m desperate to know, if you love me too.
I can’t wait to see the route that the show writers would take his character in the later seasons. Aegon is an attention whore, and judging by how he commanded the crowd during the coronation scene, I’m excited to see him in his role as king. I think he’d absolutely have fun pulling rank. I’m the king now so I as might as well milk this position for all it’s worth.
I want to see Unhinged Aegon when Blood and Cheese happens. I want them to show Aegon letting out the most feral scream that even Aemond would stand frozen in shock. I want Aegon promising Helaena that he’s going to kill the ones who murdered their son and swearing that he’d do anything to protect them all from this day onward. (Fate heard him say that they don’t have anything in common and decided to take it up as a challenge.)
I want them to show Aegon and Helaena coping with the death of their son in their own ways — I want them to show Aegon killing every rat-catcher and Helaena locking herself in her own chamber. I want Aegon to have such a rage and thirst for revenge that Aemond seems almost harmless in comparison. Blood and Cheese awakens a monster in Aegon. Aemond’s mind unravels due to his guilt (Jaehaerys wouldn't be dead if he hadn't killed Luke) and Helaena drowns in her grief. Alicent can do nothing but watch as her daughter becomes a shell of a person and her sons become deranged.