I've put up a few patches on Bandcamp as I feel this guy's lectures, and books are really valuable looks at historical and contemporary politics.
Yuri Bezmonov Patch (large) from ECLCⵜVE
a short clip of one of his interviews:
seen from Uruguay
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Africa

seen from Russia
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Russia
seen from Bulgaria

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from Bulgaria

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
I've put up a few patches on Bandcamp as I feel this guy's lectures, and books are really valuable looks at historical and contemporary politics.
Yuri Bezmonov Patch (large) from ECLCⵜVE
a short clip of one of his interviews:
soviet soldiers standing over a fallen nazi statue of some sort
The Doctrine of Obedience: Iran’s Recruitment Tactics
Understanding Iran’s power requires looking beyond missiles, sanctions, or nuclear negotiations. The real engine of influence lies in how Iran recruits, conditions, and binds individuals into long-term obedience. Its system is not accidental or reactive. It is deliberate, ideological, and designed to endure.
Iran’s recruitment strategy begins with identity. Religion is introduced not as a personal faith but as a political duty. Recruits are taught selective doctrines that glorify sacrifice, obedience, and martyrdom while discouraging doubt or moral questioning. Loyalty is redirected away from family or nation and reassigned to the Supreme Leader, portrayed as a divinely guided authority rather than a political figure. Over time, obedience itself becomes sacred, and disobedience is framed as betrayal of faith.
Poverty plays a central operational role. In fragile communities across Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen, economic hardship is leveraged as a recruitment tool. Iran’s networks offer salaries, food, education, healthcare, and social status. For many recruits, these groups provide the first sense of stability and belonging they have ever experienced. Loyalty is reinforced not only through belief but through dependency. Leaving the organization often means losing income, protection, and identity at the same time.
Education is another weapon. Religious schools, training camps, and cultural centers are used to reshape how recruits understand history and politics. Iran presents itself as a perpetual victim of Western aggression while portraying its proxies as defenders of the oppressed. Alternative narratives are filtered out. Repetition, isolation, and authority reinforce a worldview where violence is not only justified but necessary.
What makes this system resilient is its emotional design. Iran does not rely solely on fear. It builds brotherhood, ritual, and a sense of sacred mission. Fighters are convinced they are part of a timeless struggle that transcends borders and generations. This is why loyalty often survives battlefield losses, leadership deaths, and diplomatic shifts.
These dynamics are explored in detail in my video The Doctrine of Obedience, which breaks down how ideology, vulnerability, and deception sustain Iran’s global proxy warfare. For a deeper look at the financial and organizational machinery behind extremist systems, these themes are also examined in Terror Inc.: The Business of Hate and Animosity, available on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DL4N6D9C
Watch the full video analysis here: https://youtu.be/0mp4ZqCXv0A
If ideology is the real source of power, then countering Iran requires confronting belief systems, not just weapons. What part of this recruitment system surprised you most?
The Clarion Project has issued an analysis showing how billions of foreign dollars have been infused into American colleges and universities.
The Clarion Project launched its probe into foreign investment and influence in the American education system after the Department of Education (DOE) announced in June it was investigating Georgetown University and Texas A&M University “as part of a broader push to monitor international money flowing to American colleges,” the Associated Press reported.
Using data the DOE has collected based on a federal law that requires colleges to report contracts and donations of $250,000 or more, Clarion issued a report this month that revealed that, since 2012, these institutions have received more than $10 billion from these foreign entities.
Qatar – which, according to the U.S. State Department, has made gains in fighting terrorism but still hosts entities that sponsor and support terrorism – is at the top of the list with a staggering $1.4 billion dollars given to 28 universities, including $350,874,324 to Georgetown and $376,325,840 to Carnegie Mellon University.
Despite these sky-high figures, Ryan Mauro, director of Intelligence and a Shillman Fellow with the Clarion Project, told Breitbart News that, based on his investigation, the DOE statistics may not tell the whole story on foreign influence.
“These numbers are hard to fathom, but they are likely only the tip of the iceberg,” Mauro said. “There are two other figures we don’t have: The amount that the schools aren’t disclosing to the Education Department as required and the amount funneled by foreign entities using fronts.”
“For example, the Iranian regime used a front named the Alavi Foundation to funnel money to universities,” Mauro told Breitbart News. “Because that’s a U.S.-based organization, those amounts from Iran are not in the records.”
“Muslim Brotherhood fronts with ties to terrorism, such as the International Institute of Islamic Thought, are also able to donate to universities without the transfers showing up in these Education Department records,” Mauro said.
Mauro pointed to Clarion’s investigations into this issue, including an expose released in 2018 on how the Muslim Brotherhood has successfully used a front called the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) to fund, engage and train academics. The expose included a long list of professors tied to IIIT:
IIIT is a known entity of the Muslim Brotherhood, a foreign organization sponsored by foreign governments. IIIT has been investigated and nearly prosecuted for its links to foreign terrorist groups including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. IIIT is known to have received significant foreign funding.
But, because IIIT is based in the U.S. and is (supposedly) a completely independent entity, its donations are not included in the Education Department records of foreign donations to universities and colleges.
Yet there is convergence in these antagonisms, in this endless internecine warfare... The antagonists agree on one thing: on the fantasy that _____ and _____ are distinct, that they do not go together, and that one is superior to the other.
--David LeRoy Miller, CHRISTS (1981)