seen from China
seen from Tunisia
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
Some Edgeling With a Skull Icon: “Haw haw; I don’t entirely comprehend this concept, so I’m going to insinuate that everyone who likes it is an Elite™ while simultaneously red-baiting them! Ain’t I clever?” Everyone Who Actually Pays Attention: “No, not really.”
I’m not sure there’s even a point in arguing with that blogger; he’s got his head so far up his own ass that he’s looking at the back of his own teeth (but still has himself convinced, no doubt, that those belong to an herbivore). Case in point: even if he hadn’t led with pre-emptively calling everyone who might be fixing to argue with him a “child,” he’d still be arguing from the premise that anyone’s actual goal is to discredit veganism (as opposed to discrediting the fantasy of universal veganism as morally obligatory or even possible) the way he and his fellow absolutists try to discredit being a scavenger.
@fucknovegans @ableist-vegans
No one is paying attention to your blog because it continues to be the rough equivalent of one of those “what if this kids’ show was actually a hallucination or a fever dream or something and everyone was actually dead all along?” AUs cooked up by wannabe-grimdark types. And compounded by the fact that you still don’t even seem to entirely comprehend the concept that you’re trying to “deconstruct” or whatever, at that.
Again: in the face of the overwhelming prevalence of dystopianism in modern mainstream media, trying to distort something fundamentally anti-dystopian into still more of the same marks you not as the “contrarian” that you boast of being, but as an edgeling. So quit gumming up the tag.
@RationalWiki:
Is it your standard policy to let proponents of things that you’ve classified as “woo” run riot on the relevant pages, linking sources that only support their claims if meticulously cherry-picked? And if not: why have you allowed it on that page as opposed to the ones for, say, chemtrails or lost continents?
But then again: the subjects that you classify as “woo” seem to range from “actively dangerous” to “stigmatized primarily for currently being viewed as weird or unfashionable.” Hence, why I continue to take you and your (self-congratulatory, to be honest) claim of “rationality” with a grain of salt.
“If you’re not ready for discussion, you shouldn’t post at all!”
Says the person who:
Swept in on a wave of high dudgeon to begin with.
Started babbling incoherently about real-world issues and concepts of which you clearly have minimal understanding and still less desire to understand.
Trivialized the above into matters of mere rhetoric and philosophy (even going so far as to use the word “propaganda” inappropriately).
Whined about others allegedly faking the moral high ground for calling you on the above, while yourself breaking out the standard excuses for faking the intellectual high ground.
Decided to be randomly ableist in the bargain.
And...has a 3edgy5u anime icon.
In closing: nothing resembling productive discussion seems likely to be your forte even at the best of times. So hush.
Actually, I am one of those people. And even if I weren’t, it would be entirely within my rights to call you on your ‘splaining. But thanks for automatically jumping to the “lazy” conclusion and generally being such a shining example of exactly what I was talking about in that post, I guess?
P.S.: As long as y’all are all reciting from the same error-riddled script that you just take at face value instead of bothering to fact-check it, y’all do not rate to accuse anyone of being “lazy.”
Here’s the deal: some of us, considering the circumstances, kind of need anti-dystopianism right now. So can we please at least visit that relevant tag without tripping over that load of 3edgy5u Hobbesian posturing?
“I don’t trust this thing because it’s too abnormal and quirky and relatively noob-proof. I mean...sure, it’s the brainchild of someone who probably had a better idea of what they were doing than I do of what I’m talking about; and sure, it’s at least somewhat withstood the test of time. But I don’t see how any of that is relevant.”
