#indimidation

[wtf-fun-factss]

A recent study found that men on Tinder do not appear to be intimidated by highly educated women. They indicated interest in fictitious profiles with a Master’s degree more often than those with a Bachelor’s degree. – WTF Fun Facts Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775719301104

[maladroit13]

@uspostalservice DO YOU KNOW THIS POSTAL EMPLOYEE??? Today, from my kitchen, with the TV on (and everyone knows I am also deaf in one ear) I heard something hit my house. A mail carrier (NOT THE ONE PICTURED) was walking away and I saw my bread delivery (pictured) on my porch. I said something smartassed like "did you get on a ladder to drop it that far?" And she tossed some mumble answer over her shoulder. So I said "don't bother, I got your number and will make a formal complaint" and took a pic of the van, and called her a bitch since she was back in the van already. THEN...THIS WOMAN comes to my door and asked what happened, so I told her. She immediately says, "well, was it marked fragile?" And I said "it's BREAD!! YOU DONT THROW BREAD!" and she was dismissive, saying she just wanted to make sure nothing was broken.... I told her again that YOU DONT THROW BREAD, and that is when she tells me that the mail carrier didn't throw it, just dropped it, and that no one is required to knock... so I got a pic of her and took my package and decided to go to the post office to see about this. Best part, they drove 15mph down the center of my street, not delivering anything, not driving around anything they blocked the whole street so I couldn't pass This is ridiculous and will be addressed. No one should come on to my property and treat me or my belongings this way. SHAME. #postofficeabuse #damagedproperty #indimidation (at Schnitzelburg, Louisville)

[fashion-2010-ghost-blog]

Intimidation

Je ne suis pas une personne philosophe et une journaliste qui donne son opinion avec des GRAND mots. Mais je peux vous dire que je suis une personne qui a vécu pendant toute mon primaire et mon secondaire l'intimidation, sans personne qui pouvait m'aider à m'en sortir. Dans l'école où j'allais ne prendrais pas comptes des victimes, c'était les intimidateurs qui prenait place de plusieurs personne qui ont eu leur vie prisé par des gros cons (connes). En quoi cela apporte dans la vie ? De la popularité, peut-être, mais cela ne dure qu'un temps! Mais le mal dure toujours. 

Ce que je peux dire aux personne qui sont brisé, détruit, tout ce que vous voulez! Gardez la tête forte et haute! C'est peut-être dure, toutefois je peux vous dire que sa porte ces fruits! Ensuite, utilisé toute les ressources d'aide qui vous sont offert. Si vous n'avez pas confiance auprès de votre direction et/ou des professeurs, trouver une personne en dehors de l'école ou même dedans (professeurs qui vous aimez, un travailleur sociale, psychologue, etc.). Avec c'est personne vous allez avoir une arme. Encore, enregistrez les paroles et ou des vidéos. Les preuves c'est bon, avec les directions et même les policiers, avec des témoins; vos amis proches!!! 

Ayez du courage et foncer dans le tas ! Battez-vous merde!!!

[cloud-on-my-tongue-blog]

stalker types

  Stalker types

Dr Sheridan writes, ”Understanding what motivates different types of stalkers is key to understanding the nature of stalking behaviour. My research has identified four basic stalker types. Brief descriptions of each type follow, along with relevant case studies.”

Stalker Typology One:

Ex-partner harassment/stalking (50% of cases)

Characteristics:

bitterness/hate = linked to relationship’s history (past orientation)

hot-headed anger/hostility (cf. sadist’s cold need for control)

prior relationship involving domestic violence which turns to more public violence and verbal abuse

overt threats, particularly where placed in conjunction with recrimination and reference to perceived issues of contention

recruitment of friends and family to perpetuate a campaign of hate

motivating issues relate to custody/property/finance (associated issues of power/control/freedom)

new relationships engender jealousy and aggressive behaviour

third party abuse (verbal and physical), e.g. family members of and known supporters of the victim

partisanship on both sides

nature of harassment characterised by: high levels of physical violence, high levels of verbal threat, property damage

triggers for harassment both spontaneous (e.g. following a chance encounter) and pre-meditated (e.g. sitting in a car outside the victim’s home)

activity tending towards being anger driven and impulsivity with corresponding lack of concern about coming to Police attention

perpetrator age emerged as diverse and reflective of time of onset of strife in relationship

  Case Study

A 28 year old woman left her husband after five years of marriage.  Although the husband had always been verbally abusive towards her, he had recently begun to act out violently.  After she had left, his first tactic was to attempt to convince her family and friends that she had made a terrible mistake by leaving him.  In this he was largely successful.  His wife however, stubbornly refused to resume the relationship.  He then sent her a barrage of gifts, flowers and romantic letters and poetry.  When this did not have the desired effect, he attempted to abduct their daughter from school.  His final tactic was to successfully abduct his wife, tie her to a chair, douse her with petrol, and threaten to set her alight until she agreed to move back in with him.  This she did, until his arrest two days later.

Stalker Typology 2: 

Infatuation harassment (18.5% of cases)

Characteristics:

target is ‘beloved’ rather than ‘victim’

beloved is all pervasive in thoughts

world and events are interpreted in relation to beloved

beloved is focus of fantasy

focus of fantasy romantic and positive

intense yearning (cf. anger)

particular emphasis on hope of what might be (future orientation)

beloved sought out with non-malicious ruses e.g. love letters under windscreen wiper, hanging around and pretending it’s a chance encounter, quizzing friends and associates regarding any aspects of the beloved

low levels of danger

harassment not characterised by threats, macabre gifts and negative intervention (cf. sinister and intrusion of sadist below)

perpetrator age typically teenage or mid-life

  Case Study

Mr J, a 53 year old office manager with grown up children had been experiencing marital difficulties for some years.  He described himself as ‘depressed’.  When he appointed a new secretary however, he felt that he had been “given a new lease of life”.  He lost weight, traded in his estate car for a convertible and began to take a renewed interest in his appearance.  Eventually, he summoned up the courage to ask his secretary for a dinner date, which was politely refused.  Mr J continued to try and woo his secretary – regularly buying her flowers, taking an interest in all aspects of her life, appearing at her favourite pubs and nightclubs, even booking them on a two week holiday to the Maldives.  He was cautioned by police after the secretary complained to her father that she felt intimidated.  The secretary found a new job and Mr J attended marriage guidance.

  Stalker Typology 3:

Delusional fixation stalking (15.3% of cases)

Characteristics where dangerous:

stalker tends to be incoherent yet victim fixated (orientation toward the present)

victim tends to be at high risk of physical violence and sexual assault

perpetrator likely to have come to the notice of police and mental health e.g. borderline personality disorder, episodic schizophrenia

perpetrator likely to have a history of sexual problems and offences, including stalking

activity is characterised by the incessant bombarding with telephone calls, letters, visits to workplace

behavioural patterns lacking in coherence, appearing in diverse places, at irregular times

content of material sent by and conversation of perpetrator => unsubtle, sexual/obscene, and disjointed semantically

stalkers tend to couch their statements of love in terms of sexual intent towards victim (cf. romantic stance of infatuated harasser)

stalkers held belief in relationship even though there has been no prior conversation

victims are male or female and tend to have some form of elevated/noteworthy status:

- professionals (e.g. GPs, University lecturers)

- celebrities

- unfamous but local and attractive figures

  Case Study

 A 25 year old woman, Ms G, was approached outside her workplace by an unkempt individual who asked her for sexual favours.  She ignored him, but this came to be a daily event.  Ms G reported that he was regularly following her home, where he would stand in her garden and howl.  The stalker was preoccupied with a belief that the world would soon end and that his only hope of salvation was to be with Ms G when the end came.  His topic of speech would veer markedly however, between this subject and his sexual fantasies involving Ms G.  The case culminated when Ms G tried to reason with him one night in her garden, and he attempted to sexually assault her.  The stalker was placed in a psychiatric secure unit where he was diagnosed as schizophrenic.

  Characteristics where less dangerous:

stalkers hold the delusional conviction that there is an extant, idealised relationship (present and future orientation)

stalker scarcely knows victim

activity not characterised by threats – just the stated belief that the victim wants to be with him (cf. sadistic stalkers’ similar statements but with sinister twists such as “in heaven” or simply as a means of accentuating the victim’s feelings of despair that nothing works)

stalker not amenable to reason from the victim (cf. (i) infatuation harassment where clarity can attenuate the behaviour and (ii) sadistic stalking where the perpetrator consciously exploits non-response to victims’ appeals as a means of demonstrating helplessness)

stalker capable of a complete construction of a fantasy of an extant, reciprocated relationship as though victim was in accord and consensual

in the event of an eventual submerged perception that relationship is not fitting with the perpetrator’s deluded perception – with rationalisation that it is someone else’s fault (e.g. victim’s husband putting demons in her head)

in the event of an individual being identified as thwarting the relationship, there is contingent element of danger – particularly where that individual is perceived by the stalker as being dangerous to victim

victims tended to be female professionals

  Case Study

A married male formed a delusional fixation for a married female bank clerk whom he barely knew.  His delusional orientation moved over time through three phases.  Initially he behaved as if she would immediately leave her husband for him.  After several weeks he came to believe that she refused to leave the family home as she did not want her husband to be upset.  Several months later, the stalker’s orientation changed again.  Now he felt that the target’s  husband was putting voices into her head to prevent her from having a relationship with the offender.  The stalker did not threaten his victim or her husband at any point, but the fixation did continue for many more months and the offender’s own working and family life suffered considerably.

  StalkerTypology 4:

Sadistic stalking (12.9% of cases)

Characteristics:

victim is an obsessive target of the offender, and who’s life is seen as quarry and prey (incremental orientation)

victim selection criteria is primarily rooted in the victim being:

(i) someone worthy of spoiling, i.e. someone who is perceived by the stalker at the commencement as being:

- happy

- ‘good’

- stable

- content

and (ii) lacking in the victim’s perception any just rationale as to why she was targeted

initial low level acquaintance

apparently benign initially but unlike infatuation harassment the means of intervention tend to have negative orientation designed to disconcert, unnerve, and ergo take power away from the victim

- notes left in victim’s locked car in order to unsettle target (cf. billet-doux of infatuated harassment)

- subtle evidence being left of having been in contact with the victim’s personal items e.g. rifled underwear drawer, re-ordering/removal of private papers, cigarette ends left in ash trays, toilet having been used etc.

- ‘helping’ mend victims car that stalker had previously disabled

thereafter progressive escalation of control over all aspects (i.e. social, historical, professional, financial, physical) of the victim’s life

offender gratification is rooted in the desire to extract evidence of the victim’s powerlessness with inverse implications for his power => sadism

additional implication => self-perpetuating in desire to hone down relentlessly on individual victim(s)

emotional coldness, deliberateness and psychopathy (cf. the heated nature of ex-partner harassment)

tended to have a history of stalking behaviour and the controlling of others

stalker tended to broaden out targets to family and friends in a bid to isolate the victim and further enhance his control

communications tended to be a blend of loving and threatening (not hate) designed to de-stabilise and confuse the victim

threats were either overt (“We’re going to die together”) or subtle (delivery of dead roses)

stalker could be highly dangerous – in particular with psychological violence geared to the controlling of the victim with fear, loss of privacy and the curtailment of her social world

physical violence was also entirely possible – especially by means which undermine the victim’s confidence in matters normally taken for granted e.g. disabling brake cables, disarming safety equipment, cutting power off

sexual content of communications was aimed primarily to intimidate through the victim’s humiliation, disgust and general undermining of self-esteem

the older the offender, the more likely he would have enacted sadistic stalking before and would not be likely to offend after 40 years of age if not engaged in such stalking before

victim was likely to be re-visited after a seeming hiatus

  Case Study

Shortly after the death of her husband, a middle aged woman, Mrs T, formed an acquaintanceship with Mr H, a local man.  Her reliance on this man increased when she began to believe that someone was visiting her home whilst she was out.  She would regularly find that e.g. toothbrushes had been used, or that personal letters had been rearranged.  She was also upset that dead birds were frequently found on her doorstep.  Mrs T was finally admitted to hospital when she awoke to find the unearthed remains of her husband deposited on her doorstep.  Throughout this time, she described Mr H as “a tower of strength.”  Three months later, police evidence linked Mr H to the desecration of the grave.  During questioning, Mr H revealed that this had been his method of asking Mrs T “What it is that her husband has got that I haven’t.”

[you-filthy-animal-blog]

I wish I was good enough for you

you intimidate me. I get so nervous that I honestly can think straight and never know what to say.