@inquisitivespirit replied to your post
“Daily Affirmation 1055.”
an important thing to note is that NB means non-black and that meaning was in use before the nonbinary community started using it to mean something else
(Apologies if you got a notification about this and then couldn’t find the post; I had posted too early by accident!)
Hi! Thanks for writing to us about this. I’ve done some cursory research on this and what I’ve found is a 1 blog post (from a white person), 1 twitter thread (from a Black person), 2 informational articles that explain why we should use “enby” instead but give no further history, and 1 tumblr post which gives a more nuanced opinion.
Tumblr searches for “nb” bring up only nonbinary-related subjects. Searches for “nbpoc” (which could mean nonbinary people of color OR non-Black people of color) bring up almost exclusively pictures of and posts about nonbinary people of color, with one post about non-Black people of color. Searches for “nonblack” bring up lots of Black people criticizing non-Black people for their anti-Blackness, but little to no use of “nb”. Searches for “nonbinary” bring up lots and lots of uses of “nb”.
The use of “nb” to mean “nonbinary” is so widespread in the nonbinary community that I am inclined to think this either isn’t a big deal or is something that very few people are aware of.
Since ”nb” is an acronym that can and does mean many things (for example, in choir I use it to signify “no breath”; it’s also a shortening of the Latin phrase “nota bene” which has an academic meaning) I (Mod A) am - personally - a bit hesitant to rule out its use entirely for anything other than Non-Black. Though I recognize that my opinion as a white person doesn’t mean much, this is something that affects me as a nonbinary person and as the person who runs this blog.
To me...it looks like yeah, you’re right, “nb” does have more than one meaning. But its origins aside, its use as “nonbinary” is much more common than “non-Black”. Some folks may hate that, and that’s completely valid, but I think that the linguistic trend here is heading in the direction of “nb” being best understood as “nonbinary”. Like it or hate it, that’s the reality. When the overwhelming majority of people using “nb” to mean “nonbinary”, it becomes obfuscating to not acknowledge that meaning - especially when alternatives are to type out the whole word (we shortened it to “nb” for ease, in the first place) or to use divisive terms like “enby”.
I don’t see why we can’t both use it? The context of that one post I found in the #nbpoc tag about non-Black people of color made it very clear that was what the acronym meant. And when you’re blogging about trans and nonbinary things, the context is clear there, too.
Looking back at your reply after writing all this, I am not sure if you want us to stop using “nb” to mean nonbinary or if you’re giving us cultural/linguistic context. I definitely think context is important! Acknowledging the dual meaning of a word/acronym is important, especially when social justice is concerned. If that is what you meant, thank you for bringing this to our attention, and if you meant that we should stop using “nb” to mean “nonbinary”, we are certainly open to further discussion.
TL;DR: I’m going to ahead and agree with @nonbinaryresource ‘s POST on this topic for now - that is, that “nb” means both and context will suffice for distinguishing - but if we have any Black followers who would like to weigh in on this, please do not hesitate! I think this is simply a case of two groups in social justice spaces coming to use the same intuitive acronym which means different things in different contexts, not one of cultural appropriation, but we welcome any further input on the subject!