JSERC Steps Into the Field: On-Site Reconciliation Ordered in Execution Dispute
A regulatory dispute in Jharkhand has taken a decisive turn. Instead of allowing a procedural tug-of-war to drag on, the Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (JSERC) has pushed an execution matter involving Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd (JBVNL) into a fact-finding, on-ground phase — a move that signals a tightening regulatory posture.
The case, Pooja Dipesh Goyal vs JBVNL & Ors. (Case No. 33 of 2025), revolved around a complaint that JBVNL filed a writ petition before the High Court only after the petitioner initiated execution of a Vidyut Upbhokta Shikayat Nivaran Forum (VUSNF) order. The allegation: the writ wasn’t about challenging the merit of the Forum’s decision, but about delaying compliance.
Turning a legal contest into a physical verification
JSERC avoided debating motive. Instead, it cut through the procedural fog.
Both parties must conduct a joint site visit between 24–31 December, shifting focus from filings to field conditions.
JBVNL’s Assistant Electrical Engineer (AEE) — who attended the hearing — must file an affidavit-backed, comprehensive report after the visit. This moves accountability to the utility's operational level rather than its legal team.
1. Ground truth over narrative battles
Service-connection execution disputes often hinge on technical feasibility, ROW constraints or readiness — none of which can be fully understood through paperwork. A site visit forces clarity.
2. Minimising delay despite High Court litigation
Even with the writ petition pending, JSERC ensures that factual verification proceeds. If the High Court later upholds the VUSNF order, enforcement can move faster because the facts will already be established.
3. A more assertive regulatory stance
JSERC’s move reflects a broader trend among proactive state commissions: time-bound actions, tighter oversight, and fewer opportunities for licensees to drag out compliance.
Broader implications for the power sector
For consumers, this is a sign that execution petitions may finally become practical, result-driven tools instead of slow extensions of litigation.
For JBVNL, the Commission’s directive expands scrutiny on field-level decision-making.
And for India’s regulatory ecosystem, the case underscores the value of stepping out of paperwork and into real-world conditions.
For more: https://www.energylineindia.com/
