"Chilcot on Blair, Bush and the Iraq war - a year on" has been added to my site. Please visit for details. http://www.stocknewspaper.com/chilcot-on-blair-bush-and-the-iraq-war-a-year-on/

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Sri Lanka
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Costa Rica

seen from New Zealand

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Costa Rica

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Costa Rica
seen from China
"Chilcot on Blair, Bush and the Iraq war - a year on" has been added to my site. Please visit for details. http://www.stocknewspaper.com/chilcot-on-blair-bush-and-the-iraq-war-a-year-on/
Iraq Inquiry: Does Chilcot go far enough on Tony Blair? - UpFront (Arena)
Iraq Inquiry: Does Chilcot go far enough on Tony Blair? – UpFront (Arena)
The long-awaited Chilcot Report, released earlier this week, found that the British decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was based on “flawed intelligence” and the invasion went “badly wrong”. While the report stopped short of calling Blair a liar, John Chilcot, who led the inquiry, said that claims about Weapons of Mass Destruction were…
View On WordPress
Should Tony Blair be punished for the Iraq War? - UpFront
Should Tony Blair be punished for the Iraq War? – UpFront
More than a decade after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the country continues to become increasingly unstable. On Sunday, nearly 300 people were killed in the worst bombing since the invasion began. Led by the United States with the support of the British, the war paved the way for a violent insurgency and a sectarian conflict that…
View On WordPress
(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZXo2ci-Fgc)
Owen Jones accounts the stance against the Iraq War, the consequences of the invasion, the Chilcot Inquiry, Sir John Chilcot’s words, Tony Blair and why it is a shame that we did not stop it. We have a responsibility and the bringers of the Iraq War will be damned by the courts of history.
Chastened, haunted, defensive but defiant
Chastened, haunted, defensive but defiant
The Chilcot Inquiry has delivered on its promise. It has been uncompromising in its criticism of process and individuals. At a press conference this afternoon Tony Blair appeared chastened, haunted and defensive, but nevertheless defiant. I believe he made a disastrous and arrogant error, taking the country to war ‘in good faith’, without full discussion in cabinet, but it was brave of him to…
View On WordPress
(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EJK8K0ypl4)
Peter Oborne on another delay to the Chilcot Inquiry (Daily Politics)
Families line up legal challenge over delays to Chilcot's Iraq war report
Politics
Families line up legal challenge over delays to Chilcot's Iraq war report
Sir John Chilcot is facing legal action from bereaved families after again defying calls to set a timetable for publication of the Iraq Inquiry report. The move comes after Sir John said he understood the relatives' anguish but said delays were unavoidable because he wanted his long-awaited report to allow those he has criticised a right to reply - what he called the Maxwellisation process. However, Matthew Jury, of McCue & Partners, a law firm representing some of the families, said: "Sir John has refused the families' legal request to impose an effective timetable on the Maxwellisation Process, thereby preventing any deadline being set for publication of the report. In the circumstances, the families' legal team... will be taking further legal steps as are considered necessary and appropriate."
All he has stated is that witnesses 'have not been given an open-ended timescale' to respond to criticisms. By itself this is meaningless
Lawyer Matthew Jury accuses Sir John Chilcot
The families' threat followed a statement from Sir John yesterday explaining why his report had yet to be published. He said the inquiry expected to receive the last Maxwellisation responses shortly and would then be able to produce a timetable for the report. It was thought the report into the 2003 invasion would level most of its criticism at then-prime minister Tony Blair and his inner circle. But Sir John is believed to have pointed fingers are a much wider array of people and has contacted them all to get their responses. The inquiry was announced six years ago by Mr Blair's successor, Gordon Brown.
Chilcot defends delay to Iraq war report delay but insists it has 'to be fair'
Politics
Chilcot defends delay to Iraq war report delay but insists it has 'to be fair'
Sir John Chilcot today defended the long delay to his Iraq war report insisting it was "critically important" that it should be fair. He spoke out in the wake of sustained criticism in recent weeks over the hold-up with families of soldiers killed in Iraq threatening legal action. In a statement, Sir John said: "I should like firstly to reiterate that my colleagues and I understand the anguish of the families of those who lost their lives in the conflict. We take the responsibility we were given as an independent inquiry extremely seriously, and understand the need for government, parliament and the public to see our report as soon as possible."
I'm not sure he is able to understand our anguish
Roger Bacon, whose son, Major Matthew Bacon, was killed in Iraq in 2005
His remarks follow reports that the delay was because he had spread the blame for the mishandling of Britain's involvement in the 2003 invasion much farther than expected. Sir John was said to have written to everyone criticised in the report, which had been expected just to single out then-prime minister Tony Blair and his inner circle, giving them the right of reply. Today, he called that "the Maxwellisation" of the process but insisted his inquiry had stuck to its deadlines. He said: "Individuals have not been given an open-ended timescale and Maxwellisation is not a process of negotiation. We expect to receive the last responses to our Maxwellisation letters shortly." The inquiry was set up in 2009 by Mr Blair's successor, Gordon Brown, who said it would take at least a year.
The inquiry has remained in control of its deadlines throughout the process. In some cases, the response sent to us required detailed and complex analysis which has taken time.
Sir John Chilcot