Feb 19, 2022
Absolutely disgusting
seen from China
seen from China
seen from South Africa
seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Germany
seen from Israel
seen from France
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Bulgaria
seen from France
seen from Denmark
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from Australia
Absolutely disgusting
Which one of these horrible people holds the most fascination for you and why?
That’s very tough. Kermit Gosnell comes to mind. He killed unborn and newborn babies, in his position as a doctor. He disgusts me and I cannot even fathom why he did what he did.
After decades of pretending the interests of abortionists match those of women, June Medical v. Gee is a chance for the Supreme Court to let women be heard.
Imagine how third-party standing might work in non-abortion-related scenarios. Think about restaurants that violate basic health codes. Customers sickened by contaminated food and injured in substandard facilities should expect the health department to protect the public from unscrupulous operators. Now, what would you think if those same unscrupulous operators were given standing to represent the health interests of the very people they sickened? Rather than complying with basic standards of the restaurant industry, they call these sick people “undue burdens” and sue the health department. That’s chutzpah!
That’s what June Medical has done to the Louisiana Health Department. Its standing before the court relies entirely on the theory that the interests of abortionists and those of women are the same
Not only June Medical, but other abortion facilities and doctors have racked up dozens of citations from Louisiana health officials over more than two decades. These violations have resulted in catastrophic injury to patients and repeated violations of patient rights.
For instance, Delta Clinic in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, was caught in both 2009 and 2011 violating mandatory reporting laws in instances of incest and child rape. In 2014, it was still failing to record the father’s age in cases of pregnant minors. This points to a systematic papering-over of child abuse and statutory rape. No one knows how many girls who should have received help were, instead, sent home to their rapists.
Other minors were denied their right to have parental consent before invasive surgery. The facility violated patient rights when it put women out on the street before they were medically stable and allowed incompetent and unqualified staff to medicate them. At least one patient was forced to undergo a radical hysterectomy due to medical incompetence.
The list of such atrocities goes on and on. If this sounds like the laundry list of violations that preceded abortionist Kermit Gosnell’s murder conviction in Philadelphia, it should come as no surprise. Leroy Brinkley, the operator of Delta Clinic in Baton Rouge, used to employ Gosnell as an independent contractor. Like the Philadelphia abortionist, these violations were enabled because abortion facilities are routinely exempted from uniform public health standards.
https://youtu.be/ttwkr8MM9Rk
Warning! This post may contain spoilers for “Gosnell”.
If you want to see a good film on abortion related issues regardless of your stance on the issue please check out “Gosnell"! I just saw it today and it was top notch in terms of acting and production value. Earl Billings nailed his role as Kermit Gosnell so perfectly and impact fully. There are no Christian buzz words in there, and the descriptions of the abortions are medically accurate. They stick purely to the facts of the court case and even some of Gosnell's prosecutors were "pro choice" so it shows both sides, and in a way that is WAY better than "Reversing Roe" or any other pro life leaning film that I have seen. Unlike “Reversing Roe” there are no deceptive visual tricks. There is absolutely NO visually graphic representations of abortion so you don’t have to worry about seeing blood. Graphic images were not needed because the story tells itself. Unlike “Reversing Roe” it does acknowledge that partial birth abortion is a real thing referred to by its medical term “D&E abortion” in “Gosnell” and does indeed mention the real risks, like the fact that the fetus is larger which makes it harder, and fetuses are often born alive as a result of partial birth abortions. It does show that racism and abortion often occur together like when they mention how Kermit let white women have a clean room whereas black women were forced to pee in his hallway.
I'm praying the production crew and producers of “Unplanned” https://youtu.be/gBLWpKbC3ww based on the true story of Abby Johnson who worked in an abortion clinic herself, saw "Gosnell" and(and student filmmakers for that matter) took notes because that was how you make a movie based on a true story and there are parallels between the accurate medical testimony of a female abortionist during the trial scene and Abby's story as described in the book “Unplanned".
The reason I particularly point out the importance of being of seeing “Gosnell” especially the scenes about what he did to babies after the babies were born in his clinic, now is because a video surfaced of the VA Gov advocating for the killing of disabled babies once they are outside of the mother's body and calling it “comfort care” a term also used in “Gosnell”. Once the fetus is outside the mother it is no longer an abortion even. A baby outside the mother’s body definitely has separate rights from its mother, and pro abortion people I communicate with totally agree. It is why the real “Gosnell” is in prison”. It is why the Gov of VA has been referred to as “#GovGosnell” It is purely ableism and hatred of disability because its deciding for a person whether or not they have value based solely on a biological reality they have zero control over, disability! It makes disabled people like myself fear for our very lives as born children and adults. It is why assisted suicide and movies like "Me Before You" are particularly dangerous to the disability community. This has to stop and I believe the movies “Gosnell” "Unplanned" can save lives!
The story of Dr. Kermit Gosnell, whose dangerous and unethical practices in his abortion clinic led to his conviction on murder and manslaughter charges, resulting in a life sentence in prison.
You might now be tempted to stop reading this as you retreat into a pre-formed position on abortion. Don’t. This is the moral no-man’s land that hasn’t been rationally discussed since the political screaming started in the early 1970s, during the oral arguments for Roe v. Wade.
Inside the womb, the procedure is legal so long as the fetus has not advanced to an arbitrary stage of development. So who decides if a fetus is too advanced to abort? “I do,” Gosnell responded.
Is that the right answer? Should an individual doctor be drawing the critical line between legal abortion and murder? Is this moral question better settled in the Supreme Court? Surely it’s not up to non-doctors and non-judges to intervene on the question of if and when the termination of a pregnancy crosses the line from helping a woman with an unwanted pregnancy into murder.
After seeing Gosnell sneer at the line, I see the urgency of public participation in the question. If it is left up to the advocates for unfettered abortion rights, would there be any line at all?
Recently, we’ve heard people speaking out against political violence with assurance that the ballot box is the proper place to resolve our great conflicts in the United States. Yet the Roe v. Wade decision seems to have permanently excluded abortion from the normal political process in which moral judgments can be debated, tested, and evolved according to the state of medical science and public morality.
DING DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD