Not even gonna reblog any of the Switch cover art because it's AI. I was just thinking about how much quality control is at Disney to where they have to approve everything and yet they allow one of their most- not even just one of- second most popular character only to Mickey Mouse! not even have the right amount of fingers, some of the stuff I 'could' excuse as a squeeze by but there are way too many in that picture to point out, some I haven't even seen some people point out yet like this-
No rounded points at the end of the crown. I knew it wasn't a Nomura art immediately and I at first took it for just a new artist's art and was open to it but a shiver went down my spine when I thought it could be AI and of course, I was unfortunately right.
There are these random black and white borders just in the middle of the art which is just bad design if it was intentional. It even frames the castle like it was pasted in Photoshop- no- photoshop would've done a better job. So yeah, I'm gonna drag it through the mud as much as possible because I know Nomura's busy and he only ended up finishing the KH3 artwork really close to the deadline so I don't blame him for not making another art but I also know this wasn't his decision. I can almost guarantee you that AI wasn't used for KH4 (because if it was so efficient, wouldn't it be out already?) and I hate to see his creation's image destroyed like this because of- someone's negligence. I wanna say Disney because they've been so pro AI but it could be Square acting as a company. I doubt it's Nintendo as it's only their console.
Screw whoever made this decision, you could have very well have just used the art that's been with the collection thus far, it's only been out for years! It doesn't show that you care to make new keyart to promote your product (that, again, has been out for years already) unless you get an actual artist.
