“If you oppose abortion, you should talk about it without saying why you oppose it, even though I have no actual idea what that argument would be.”
This really sounds like you’re just mad pro-life people call you mean things.
There are very few, if any pro-life people who don’t think abortion is murder and oppose it on that basis.
I wasn’t even defending pro-lifers, I was legitimately asking.
Also, I like how someone who deliberately calls pro-lifers “anti-choicers” (which is itself a slur by her definition) complains about people using insulting language to him.
And also “buzzwords”. Like “anti-choicer”, which is the exact same thing he’s kvetching about, just from the other side.
And now she’s begging for validation for her willful ignorance.
It’s almost like he’s just saying whatever comes to mind to rationalize his stupid opinion that the other side should only make arguments he likes.
And yes, the coward blocked me. And basically everyone else who disagreed.
NTS: Comic files.
A, wearing paper crown, outside, walking near hedge in BG, sunny day: I wish “anti-choicers” would make arguments against abortion without calling it “**baby murder**!” B, behind: Like what?
Wide chibi shot of A and B, sun above their heads, in front of bush. A has stopped, and turned around with raised eyebrows.
Same wide shot, A alone, at night, crescent moon, arms crossed, propping up chin, looking down, still thinking hard, under streetlight (off panel behind him)
1111 22/ 33
Commentary: I am not making this up.
I like how he went “if this is your only argument, you don’t have a real argument!” without actually saying why the position is wrong at any point other than his own opinion.
The closest thing to an actual criticism was handwaving it away as a “buzzword”.
Also, I’m not pro-life or pro-choice. I just think a lot of pro-choice people make bad arguments, and I was legitimately asking kings-catastrophe to explain his views.