Is self-defense the reason given for the shooting? Yes.
Did the agent survive? Yes.
Did the driver survive? No.
What was the physical danger the driver faced? A firearm.
What was the physical danger the agent faced? A 2-ton SUV.
Was the agent within at least a few feet of the vehicle before it started moving? Yes.
Did shooting the driver immediately halt the momentum of the 2-ton vehicle? No.
Would there be a reasonable expectation that shooting the driver would immediately halt the momentum of a 2-ton vehicle? No.
Is getting out of the way of a moving vehicle the best way to not be hit by that moving vehicle? Yes.
Does getting out of the way of a moving vehicle require shooting a gun? No.
Is it possible that aiming and shooting a gun will actually delay getting out of the way of a moving vehicle? Yes.
Was the agent holding a gun in his right hand and a phone in his left hand? Yes.
Did he drop either his phone or his gun throughout the entire altercation? No.
Did he shoot her at least two more times through the driver's side window while he was next to the vehicle? Yes.
Were there other people near the agent when he fired his gun? Yes.
Was the vehicles accelerator pegged after he shot her? Yes.
Did that cause the vehicle to speed down a neighborhood street until it collided with other cars where its engine continued to redline even after it was stopped? Yes.
Was that a potential danger to the general public? Yes.
Taken from DarkMatter2525's analysis of the situation. These are the facts of the matter. Shooting her did not stop her vehicle and yet he still survived. Shooting her directly endangered surrounding officers and any civilians in the area.
I can see from a police standard, arguing this was a fair shoot based on self-defense due to the complicated nature of self-defense and policing in general. But the facts of the matter do not speak kindly towards Jonathan Ross's actions as an intelligent human being.
As far as her actions being on her, maybe, but she had pretty strong justifications for everything she did here as well when you consider the actual facts. ICE certainly is something worth opposing. Opposing it puts you in danger. ICE under Trump is not necessarily beholden to law and can basically do what they want to you, as far as we can tell. Would you want to be captured by what you viewed as the gestapo of a fascist government as a visible minority?
She did her best to avoid harming anyone to the point that her vehicle didn't end up harming anyone even without her controlling it anymore. Renee Good did put herself in danger though. Of course she did. By protesting a fascist government's state police. That's hardly something that I think anyone should be killed for. She's a hero.
PS: Don't reblog my Israel posts again or you'll get more of these. Don't mistake me for one of you just because I'm not a leftist.
