You can count on CLAMP for scantily clad women, angsty gay boys, and pining yuri.
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Belgium

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lithuania

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Yemen
seen from Japan
You can count on CLAMP for scantily clad women, angsty gay boys, and pining yuri.
I don’t know Edelgard, but I’ve seen this argument before
So I just heard from Thorgi's top character countdown that people love Edelgard because she wanted to break down a whole system that was unjust, in order to protect people. And that's fine. I didn't watch playthroughs of her story route, but sounds like the same type of thing I loved about Code Geass. Cool. But if people are defending her by titling their arguments "Edelgard did nothing wrong", I'm going to have to take offense at that. No one can be alive without hurting or killing something else to survive. That's what eating is. The only way to justify killing something else to survive, is to make your survival/existence worth it. The only way to justify killing someone else in a war is to accept that the thing (people, ideals) you want to protect, are worth taking those lives. (At least by samurai anime logic.) But you accept that what you have done is a sin, evil, not "right" in and of itself, that in a perfect world, would not have been something that needed to be done. You can't maintain the dignity of "committing evils to prevent greater evils" as Lelouch said, without fully accepting that you have conceded to doing evil. Because the alternative is to try to say you "did nothing wrong", and that is a slippery slope that only marks certain things as evil/good whenever convenient for only your own individual purposes, and slowly erodes one's sense of empathy. Now that's a true evil. That type of subjective, self-centered thinking is what leads to those "greater evil" systems that must be broken down by the means of "lesser evils" (which are presumably a lesser level of subjective self-centeredness). People get hurt in war. That's an absolute. And trying to nullify that fact by saying those pains suffered by civilians/soldiers/enemies/people were negligible or "didn't count", leads to evils that invalidate the sacrifices from deciding to go to war, in order to stop greater evils. If something is so worth protecting that you have to hurt something/someone else to protect it, then take pride in that thing you’re protecting being WORTH it, but also don’t diminish your pride in deciding something was worth protecting, even at the expense of others, by deluding yourself into thinking that sacrifice wasn’t even a sacrifice. If she's so sure that what she's doing is "right", and will dispel a greater evil, then I'm sure Edelgard is taking pride in what she is doing, by recognizing her methods are not kind, by not turning blind to the faults in her own methods, and by preserving her empathy by not deluding herself into thinking she "did nothing wrong".
I know that "[this character] did nothing wrong" is a meme and people just wanted to use it as a shorthand to title their arguments... But that notion that someone committing evil to stop greater evils, without maintaining the empathy/Compassion to recognize they are still committing evils, even for a good cause, is just really offensive to me. I dunno...Maybe I watched too many samurai and martial arts anime. ~.~;
Utilitarianism in Anime by Anime Philosopher
Translated from Japanese: "【Code Geass 20th Anniversary Fair】New products are arriving one after another! Reserve by 【6/28】 to ensure availability! https://movic.jp/shop/r/r101005_hy/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=jp_twi03139 CodeGeass"
NEW PLAMATEA LELOUCH??????????????????????? THAT'S AN ARTICUALTED FIGURE LINE, RIGHT????????????????????
Think I need that C.C. cat <3