ladysaviours replied to your post: One of my theatrebros informed me tonight that the...
I would like to know more about how Banquo had it coming!
Banquo’s got that short soliloquy at the start of 3.1 where he’s like “It sure is awfully convenient that Duncan ended up murdered right after those witches said you’d be king, buddy.” The most significant part of the speech is “I fear thou play’dst most foully for it,” since that shows that Banquo is totally onto Macbeth’s shenanigans. In that case, murdering Banquo is just good business. You know, on the murder curve.
But THEN, the last thing he says in the speech before Macbeth and his court enter is:
“Why, by the verities on thee made good,
May they not be my oracles as well,
And set me up in hope?”
So Banquo’s already thinking about what the Weird Sisters promised him! His initial disbelief in the prophecy has been turned to cautious hope now that parts of it have come true--which is the same trajectory Macbeth himself follows re: the prophecy earlier in the play. PRETTY AMBITIOUS THERE, BANQUO.
Plus, given that Banqup knows the fulfillment of Macbeth’s prophecy was not through an act of Providence, but through Macbeth murdering his way into kingship... the fact that he’s wondering if his descendants might rule as promised suggests to me that he’s not averse to overthrowing Macbeth (or in assisting Fleance in overthrowing him, or in Fleance waiting till Macbeth’s death and ousting other claimants). Macbeth has no children, after all, so his DNA isn’t going to marry his way into the kingship. Usurpation’s the only option.
And even if Banquo just means “hey, maybe my descendants will be kings centuries from now!” it’s still kinda sketch, because then it’s like “well, I mean, my friend committed regicide, but I guess that’s cool if my half of this thing comes true too!”
Banquo was totally going to start some shit, IMO. Banquo had to go.