We are the same living as we are dying
Lonely Christopher, from Crush Dream
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from Canada
seen from China
seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Yemen

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Uruguay

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
We are the same living as we are dying
Lonely Christopher, from Crush Dream
anything in the orange light / of my word for you / anything / to excuse / all the pain.
Lonely Christopher, from Crush Dream
Today in the worst things I have ever read, an author claims that his book is "not fanfic" for a variety of reasons that seem to coalesce in his need to quote literary theorists.
Some of you might have spotted this week's kerfuffle about how it if was written by a dude it can't be fanfic, in the guise of an interview with author Lonely Christopher, who claims not to have written fan fiction of Stephen King's The Shining. The Mary Sue article covers it pretty well (and has a link to the original interview, should you be that way inclined), but we thought we'd highlight some Fan Studies research that could help Christopher put his work in the wider fan fiction context. Here are a couple of extracts from the interview to get us started: "LC: The book can be read as a self-contained “novel,” but it’s more than that. I used another text conceptually, structurally, and materially to generate a resultant yet original work. That’s what I mean by “source.” The text that I was utilizing was the novel The Shining by Stephen King and the subsequent media iterations and interpretations and its cultural ubiquity. So I wrote my story in relation to another, more specifically on top of it. I took the basic tropes of The Shining and replicated and subverted them, and I also took chunks of language and interwove material pieces of Stephen King’s novel. (...) Interviewer: You’ve described this book as “intertextual.” Tell us a little bit more about this book’s relationship to other literature. LC: The book is a concerted rejection of the standards of any type of literature, so in that way it is reacting to the formal elements it eschews, and interacting with readerly expectations as well as the history of the medium. I guess the reason why this isn’t “fan fiction” is because, first of all, it’s not enjoyable in the same way and then it’s vaguely academic. Aesthetically speaking, it owes much to Stein, Beckett, Robbe-Grillet, and Bernhard. Intellectually, it has a relationship to Barthes, Foucault, Derrida, Debord, and especially Baudrillard. So it is having conversations with different texts in different ways." You may recall a couple of relevant articles, such as this one by Abigail Derecho on fan fiction as "archontic literature". One of the really interesting points Derecho makes in it is how fan fiction writers will frequently repeat the same motif, explore the same scene, but with a difference. (For those interested in the "vaguely academic", Derecho bases on Deleuze's concept of "repetition with a difference".) So we may look at something from a different character's point of view, or take a group of characters and put them in a coffee shop AU, or try to work out what would be different if a character had made a slightly different choice. You know what that does? It plays with and challenges the reader's expectations, and allows readers to make meanings from both the similarities and the differences between the two texts. You may also remember this paper by Mafalda Stasi which looks at fan fiction as a "palimpsest" - the medieval practice of partially erasing and writing over past manuscripts, creating layers of text and meaning. Does that sound a bit like what Christopher is doung by writing his novel "on top of" The Shining? Maybe a bit. Fan fiction and transformative work intellectual property law scholars like Rebecca Tushnet may also have something to say about Christopher's taking "chunks of language" and "inter[weaving] material pieces" of King's novel, and how ideas about this both among the fan fiction community and among rightholders of the commercial works we base our fan fiction on have evolved over time to a point where Lonely Christopher can do this.
tonight at Nomadic Press 2926 Foothill Blvd, # 1, Oakland, California 94601
7pm - 9pm
Join us for a very special evening of readings by New York's own Lonely Christopher, the East Bay's own Tsartitsa Alexandra Naughton, and the intense-and-beautiful music of Chris Peck. Donations will be called for throughout the night, but no one will be turned away for lack of funds. Wine and Red Bay coffee will be available.
"June Emotional Poem" appears in Death & Disaster Series (2014)
(this one’s from 4/20)
I admire the purity of the sentiment. “Your qualities will all supermarkets” indeed. His poems are variations on stabbings, and this one is a real quick in/out that might not be fatal but you should probably get it checked out ASAP.
-Thomson
A town waits for a road. Based on "The Relationship" by Lonely Christopher. Starring Ron Lea, Tony Rosato, Sam Earle, Aidan Greene, Myles Erlick, and Julian Richings. Narrated by David Fox with music by Clara Engel.
reading in San Francisco with lonelychristopher, biancastone, and Matthew Zapruder