#loveandknowledge

[loveandknowledge]

The statue of Niccolo Machiavelli, also known as the father of modern political science, at the Uffizi Gallery, Florence

- loveandknowledge

[loveandknowledge]

Bust with the head of Marcus Aurelius at the Uffizi Gallery, Florence

- loveandknowledge

[loveandknowledge]

I was rewatching 'The Pursuit of Happyness'... and this part got me right in the feels.

- loveandknowledge

[loveandknowledge]

A prison where the inmates have to go and find jobs

At Sanganer prison in India's Jaipur, inmates have to go out and earn money to provide for themselves.

"At Sanganer prison, in the Indian city of Jaipur, inmates get a roof over their head, but no money and no food. This means they must go to work and earn their living beyond the prison gates, writes Masuma Ahuja - as labourers, factory workers, drivers, even yoga teachers."

- Could this work in other countries as well? If I recall right, a similar concept is used somewhere in Scandinavia (except that the "towns" where the inmates work are behind prison walls as well): loveandknowledge

[loveandknowledge]

Music is the voice of the soul.

loveandknowledge

[loveandknowledge]

i strongly advocate stoicism, and the stoic approach illustrated by ryan holiday; however, i do think that this article raises some valid criticisms - that stoicism may be a form of self-deception, and that it may cause us to evade our true emotions instead of channeling such emotions as a means of engagement: "According to Stoicism, an ancient school of philosophy now experiencing a popular resurgence, we should attempt to curb our emotions when faced with things we can do nothing about. Historically, the Stoics believed in a strict “dichotomy of control”—that is, they divided the world into things that lie within one’s power to change and things that do not. Most suffering, they said, comes from our mistaken belief that we have power over things we actually cannot control. Their solution is to focus on what we can control: our opinions, impulses, desires and aversions, instead of external events. Stoics concluded that we should accept the rest, saying, “as God wills.” But the problem with this attitude is that it can lead us to accept things that we shouldn’t. As we confront the global rise of authoritarianism, we should not respond by attempting to gain control over our emotions. Instead, we must let our emotions guide us to action. [...] Although modern Stoics may not necessarily believe in God, they continue to advocate for curbing emotions like anger and fear in the face of injustice. Stoic author Ryan Holiday, for example, told Quartz that “a Stoic wouldn’t spend time complaining about whether Trump deserves to be president and worrying about the uncertain terrible effects of his leadership.” Instead, Holiday opined, Stoics would focus on affecting the next presidential election. On the surface, this approach might seem practical. But Holiday fails to see how emotions are directly tied to our actions... What’s more, Holiday’s word choices are also revealing. He characterizes questioning Trump’s legitimacy as “complaining,” and labels fears about the dangers of Trump’s regime as “worrying.” These words downplay the gravity of Trump’s election, thereby attempting to discredit the feelings of many people who are rightfully fearful, grieving, or angry. Even in contemporary times, Stoics are mired in their resignation to live in the world as it is, rather than imagining the way it could be. Indeed, other philosophers have long argued that Stoicism, in failing to grasp the complexity of the world, offers only self-deception. Friedrich Nietzsche called Stoics “extraordinary stage-players and self-deluders” who choose to see things falsely. And Jean-Paul Sartre saw Stoicism as an evasion that aims to keep both master and slave in their places. So Stoicism is inimical to freedom. It is true that we cannot control everything, but Stoicism is the wrong response. If Stoicism is not the answer, what, then, should we do about things we can’t do anything about? One possibility is to look to emotions as a means of engagement."

[loveandknowledge]

We must go out and re-ally ourselves to Nature every day. We must make root, send out some little fibre at least, even every winter day. I am sensible that I am imbibing health when I open my mouth to the wind. Staying in the house breeds a sort of insanity always. Every house is in this sense a hospital. A night and a forenoon is as much confinement to those wards as I can stand. I am aware that I recover some sanity which I had lost almost the instant that I come [outdoors].

Henry David Thoreau, ‘The Journal of Henry David Thoreau, 1837–1861’. A timely reminder to myself as I recover from my ACL reconstruction surgery at home.

[loveandknowledge]

this is wonderfully written :') a good reminder to ourselves to practice acceptance, be mindful of impermanence, and to practice non-attachment. i really like the dancing analogy too, reproduced below. the comic sums it up beautifully, showing how we can have our own independent pursuits yet return to the love for our partners <3 “[Love is] like a dance. And we have to give each being space to dance their dance. Everything is dancing; even the molecules inside the cells are dancing. But we make our lives so heavy. We have these incredibly heavy burdens we carry with us like rocks in a big rucksack. We think that carrying this big heavy rucksack is our security; we think it grounds us. We don’t realize the freedom, the lightness of just dropping it off, letting it go. That doesn’t mean giving up relationships; it doesn’t mean giving up one’s profession, or one’s family,or one’s home. It has nothing to do with that; it’s not an external change. It’s an internal change. It’s a change from holding on tightly to holding very lightly.”