Anise - Ekaterina Lukasheva by Rui.Roda https://flic.kr/p/24a8Q6D
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Austria
seen from Yemen
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia
seen from Belgium

seen from Malaysia
seen from Mali
Anise - Ekaterina Lukasheva by Rui.Roda https://flic.kr/p/24a8Q6D
Hiya! Itâs been a long time. Things are getting better, but. Anyways, lets talk origami.
So I took the Rafaelita unit and stretched it along both axes. The top two pictures are one way and the bottom the other. Interestingly, theyâre obviously both edge units, but in one, they became face-joining and in the other, vertex-joining. The top is disassembled because hexagons, while beautiful and perfect and my favorite shape, are not terribly stable, and refused to cooperate.
Iâve been thinking about buckyballs alot. The ones we fold are really the dual of the Buckminster Fullerene molecule (I believe) which I find FASCINATING. Especially since we think of them the same. Either way, Iâve nattered extensively about buckyballs elsewhere, I believe, so Iâll just say this. These tetrahedra (for the tetrahedron is self-dual) are made with the origami version of the buckyball in mind. They each took 24 units to make, and the construction was vastly different - and fun! If you make these, notice the hidden octohedron in the bottom one - it blew my mind when I saw it. I think next Iâd like to make an icosahedron using the bottom method.
Hiya! Here are two Buckyballs made with Lukashevaâs Rafaelits module! The one on the left is the version with triangular faces whereas the one on the right is composed of hexagons and pentagons.
I decided to make both because I hate myself there was something that felt weird about the triangular facet version every time Iâve made it. Well, except the first, but that was with PHiZZ units, and yearsyearsyears ago, so Iâm not counting it. Please ignore the detritus on the desk and also the gaps - the Rafaelita donât like sixes.
The problem I have with the triangular facet version of the buckyball is this: it looks like an icosahedron. I included an extra shot of the triangular one so that you could see the division into giant triangle faces. There are twenty of them. Each on of them is one hexagon on a normal Buckyball (of course) and 1/5 of the pentagon at each corner.
Hereâs the difference. Towards the bottom of this page on Eulerâs Theorem (one of many, Iâm assuming), it states that you cannot have have the sum of three angles at a vertex equal 360° - thatâd be flat. Youâd be tiling the plane. Basically, you wonât have groups of three hexagons; the interior angle is 120°. When weâre using triangles, though, the interior angle is 60°, so the problem is triangles in groups of six.Â
Now! The cool thing about the triangular facet version - there are clusters of six triangles EVERYWHERE. There are far more than twenty. Yes, they get used multiple times, thatâs irrelevant. So, basically, you have would have a giant flat plane if there werenât the clusters of five triangles that act as the vertex for the giant triangle faces. Planes can easily bend in one direction and when you complete your buckyball, youâll see lines that form the edges of the triangles, running right through hexagons. Itâs really neat.
Now, there are two conclusions to be drawn from this:
Because youâre making giant triangle faces, youâd get an octahedron if you exchanged the group of five triangles at the edge for a group of four, and a tetrahedron with a cluster of three.
And, since weâre not constrained against tiling the plane, we can actually make the faces have more or fewer triangles, as long as it follows a couple of specific rules.
Neat right? Next thing I want to make is a triangular facet version with colors organised in hexagons and pentagons - itâll look pretty. :3
Talk about an interesting project! We used Lukashevaâs Rafaelita module and made an dodecahedron. Lauren, the Art Therapist, chose the 12 colors and the 5 variations of the colors. Folding the pieces was easy, assembling it was, ultimately, easy, and coloring the facets was easy (I would assume - I did none of that). I was in charge of the folding and coördinating the colors. Coördinating the colors was a beast.
We had the palettes for the colors before painting the units, of course. As you can see, I kept a tried to keep order by placement in a circle and by marking off shades weâd used. The painters tape to keep the colors in order? A godsend. Without it, this wouldâve been incredible difficult.
Itâs hard to see in the pictures, but there are 60 distinct colors on this dodecahedron. Some, such as the green are orders of magnitude different. The black face? Although inappropriately referred to just now, the facets were different, but subtly. Different enough to recognize, but not quite enough to see, if that makes sense.Â
10/10 project, 10/10 teammate, would fold again
If anyone ever tells you you have too much painterâs tape, donât trust them. Theyâre probably trying to steal some of your painterâs tape because they donât have enough.
At my momâs school, thereâs an Art Therapy student working on her Masterâs. Apparently her Masterâs thesis has something to do with color choice (specifically with neurodivergent students? Iâm not sure). My mom was supposed to send me the paper, but I never got it, so. Details. Regardless, she saw this and mentioned to Mother Dearest that she wanted to talk to me about making something kinesthetically manipulable for her with different colors. Iâve not actually met with her, so I have no idea what she ACTUALLY WANTS. Thatâs okay, though. I decided for her. You canât tell in the pictures, I think, but itâs actually pretty large - I used a thick cardstock cut into 8 3/4âł squares, which Iâd say was fun, but thereâs no way for me to accurately portray how sarcastic Iâd be. I chose oil pastels over India inks for a bunch of reasons that I donât feel like typing. I chose Lukashevaâs Rafaelita for a few reasons that, again, I donât feel like typing.
Sorry Iâve been absent - Iâve been a little maudlin lately, and I know you all followed me because of my sunny disposition not because of any folding, SO. I kid, I kid. But, yeah, maudlinâs not a pretty color on me. ALTHOUGH MAUDE LYNN IS A GREAT NAME omg. Owen Bytheway, have I not told you about my ever-so-slight obsession with names?
This is the money kusudama. Make one and youâll have $150 you need to unfold before you spend it.
Sorry, couldnât resist. Itâs a wedding gift for my BEST FRIEND whoâs marrying my OTHER BEST FRIEND and guess whoâs performing the ceremony?! ME
The model is the Dollar Crocus from Lukashevaâs first book. I had wanted to make it with tens, but it wasnât economically feasible. That being said, I was super pleased with the succulency the pink tips lent it. It was incredibly disorienting to work with money. It is NOT paper, and for all that I use tons of different kinds of paper, this was the most NOT paper material Iâve folded. Also, the print on the paper made connecting the units very confusing for the first couple.
Thing I loved about this model: the accordion-like reverse folds gave the design a remarkable ability to absorb the force that typically makes kusudama start to become spheres early on (think anything with rigid units?). It was flat until I had like eight left and BAM it was round.Also, the inside was quite interesting. :D
My latest model folded, Kusudama Paradigma by Ekaterina Lukasheva
Got the instruction from tadashimori's YouTube channel
Took about 8-9 hours...but i think it was worth it :D