this line is driving me bonkers
M: Yes I will be ordering on behalf of my boy toy™️
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Spain
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from France
this line is driving me bonkers
M: Yes I will be ordering on behalf of my boy toy™️
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
James v United Kingdom [1986] is an English land law case, concerning tenants' (lessees') statutory right to enfranchise a home from their freeholder (ultimate landlord) and whether specifically that right, leasehold enfranchisement, infringes the freeholder's human rights in property without being in a valid public interest.
45. ...a taking of property effected in pursuance of legitimate social, economic or other policies may be in the public interest, even if the community at large has no direct use or enjoyment of the property taken. [...]
aka novel!bond's sub awakening
Relationship: M | Miles Messervy/James Bond
Length: 3,234 words
i was feeling bad abt both how scant the m07 tags were and also the image of m telling bond abt his sub mr hammond popped in my head. everyone get more m07pilled now
May’s Hoenn team (as of Destiny Deoxys)
joking about your boss being an "ol' ball and chain", a terrible relationship you can't get out of. normal (kind of).
whatever the hell this is:
that. that's not. James.
thinking abt this post re: british boys public school culture... its hitting the MQ7 brainworms like. m as someone who definitely grew up with fagging and was a participant in it both as a fag & a fag-master. bond maybe caught the tail end or perhaps just went to school just as it was made illegal, but it was very recent history. and then q as someone for whom it was a historical practice, in the way you treat history you never experienced, as a sort of story. anyway thinking abt that as like. a lens over their relationship/TPE practice. all three of them sort of working through the trauma of the public school life together.
q as someone who was damaged the least by his schooling (at least in part due to being a day boy for much of it), views it more as like. a kinky ritual he finds really hot. and hes bringing it up to m both as a way to like, explain TPE when he realises its an actual part of m's past. (in my mq7 mind the D/s dynamic of their relationship is q is 95% D, m is 85% D, bond is 45% D. so their relationship hierarchy falls generally into q>m>>>>>>bond)
so he and m start like. exploring that history and all those complicated feelings through D/s play, at first with m subbing for q and then when bond joins (or begs his way into) their relationship, they experiment with bond fagging for m.
for m & bond its a way to connect over shared experiences and work through these parallel experiences theyve had. q is just a pervert who is like wow its really hot to watch you get switched for not shining our boots well enough
classic "bond bothers q by flirting with him/asking him on dates and q rebuffs him" au, except every time q rebuffs bond he says something like "why don't you go ask m?" and bond takes this as q rejecting him playfully, but is still confused cuz q keeps flirting back
eventually at some point bond snaps and asks someone abt it (q? moneypenny? actually i think it's funniest if he asks m). at the end of a briefing, bond is still there, shifting about but not leaving. and when m is like "anything else, 007?" bond is like "did you know q keeps turning me down by telling me to ask you out? it's really strange..."
and m is like are you joking? and bond is like ???? and m goes "bond, q and i are married." and bond is like [shocked pikachu]
so he goes off on his mission and when he comes back he's returning his equipment to q and asks "why do you keep telling me to go ask m out when you're married?"
and q is like "well it's only polite when asking for a threesome to ensure all parties are interested in it." and bond is like "??? you didn't talk about this with m?" and q is like "of course we did, but we didn't want to put you on the spot in the event that you may feel pressured to answer a certain way as m is your superior"
and bond just goes "ah" and stumbles away, wondering why he's half hard bc of q calling m bond's superior