Twitter reacts to court ruling upholding Arizona redistricting
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that citizens have the right to oversee the boundaries of their congressional districts to prevent redistricting that would favor one party over the other, commonly known as “gerrymandering.” The case concerned the creation of the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, a nongovernmental, bipartisan body that conservatives argued favored Democrats. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
Ginsburg writes SCOTUS majority opinion upholding Arizona's anti-gerrymandering law. http://t.co/lXzto2ereO pic.twitter.com/BXhsV20v66
— Keith Boykin (@keithboykin)
June 29, 2015
Twitter reacted to the ruling directly following the court’s announcement.
In upholding independent redistricting in AZ, #SCOTUS places fair Congressional representation above gerrymandering. http://t.co/i4URxLI1vo
— Mike Bloomberg (@MikeBloomberg)
June 29, 2015
Supreme Court's #Arizona #Redistricting Ruling a Major Victory for Voters: http://t.co/JL1DzgwP5p #SCOTUS
— Brennan Center (@BrennanCenter)
June 29, 2015
If you want to stop gerrymandering and help Dems retake the House, need AZ/CA style redistricting commissions in all 50 states.
— Robert Cruickshank (@cruickshank)
June 29, 2015
Despite the widespread praise for the ruling, journalist Hunter Schwartz of the Washington Post struck a cautionary tone.
Why ending gerrymandering won’t solve Congress’s problems https://t.co/sNNksJB8ju
— Hunter Schwarz (@hunterschwarz)
June 29, 2015









