Longevity extends beyond a long lifespan to incorporate healthy, disability-free aging. Aging it often includes a decline in functionality a

seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from India

seen from Latvia

seen from Serbia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
Longevity extends beyond a long lifespan to incorporate healthy, disability-free aging. Aging it often includes a decline in functionality a
Amazing '3-in-1' Premium Quality Green Coffee Bean, Raspberry Ketones Complex & Garcinia Cambogia Best Extract Combination Supplement, Best Weight Loss Supplement for Your Body, Help in Appetite Suppressant, Weight Loss and Fat Burning Support, # of Capsule 120, 05/2017, Naturonic
Here you got the best-selling weight-loss 4-in-1 natural products combines together. How does it work: All products help together in balance to deliver a product that blocks fat formation, burns existing fat, and supports metabolic function. This product works for a vast majority of the people Read more at http://bit.ly/1ieGBcs
Do you promote the idea that fat people must be either sick or be made sick and deserve to die?
No? Then you are not promoting ‘obesity’. The ‘obesity’ construct is a tool to invoke, uphold and promote nothing less than the undermining and destruction of fat people’s health. In order to make them fit the model of fat =sickness.
Fat phobes promote ‘obesity’, their accusation is a confession of their own intent [as their accusations often are].
Anyone who wants control of weight to be a thing, will advocate for genuine objective research into how metabolic function produces weight and how to alter that, in order to produce change in a proper and effective manner.
Fat phobes never do.
The ‘obesity’ construct and its crusade is a regressive anti-scientific progress project
To repeat my response to that last titp reblog;
Yet again this kind of non-question is deliberate continuation of mindless distraction. There are people of all weights who have underlying metabolic problems. Dividing people into fat/thin, presenting fatness as indivisible with metabolic disease is sweeping that under the rug allowing the perpetuation of suffering for people of all sizes. Subverting the possibility of medical progress for all.
We all have a metabolic system. Indeed, it would be fair to say that human beings are metabolic creatures.
The weird bisecting of people into fat/slim, the collapsing of all metabolic dysfunction into BMI 25 + is obscuring a fundamental truth. That mastery, understanding and use of metabolic function, has real potential as a route to greater physical and mental health.
The ‘obesity’ construct is not just a direct assault on fat people’s health, it is denying a promising route toward medical progress for all sizes. Setting people of different weight against each other is all about us not noticing this.
Georgia Davis-people with metabolic imbalance
Regarding Georgia Davis, the woman who had to be airlifted to hospital recently. The ‘obesity’ crusade defines everyone with a BMI of 30+ as a copy of the same person. This is obviously nonsense as any grouping of people will vary in themselves and in health status, regardless of size.
The upshot of merging the sick with the well, is those who are well are harassed into feeling or becoming sick-via deliberate sustained assaults on their mental health and well being, via, social sanction, taxing, exclusion etc,
Those who do have actual health and/or metabolic problems are left with nothing to limit, stop or treat them. It's more or less a withdrawal of medicine by not investigating what's wrong with them. And it is underwritten by the pervasive “let’s get fat people mentality.”
Not everyone who’s this fat is by any means unwell, the point is there’s nothing to stop anyone’s body reaching whatever heights it may, which is unacceptable.
This is a product of the ‘obesity’ crusade which insists one way, one that doesn’t even work. This traps everyone, including those who wish to lose weight and aren’t even fat, into a pathological proto-anorexia mode.
There are numerous ways of interrupting fertility. Despite the high rate of success of the contraceptive pill other ways have been and still are pursued. No one would say fertility’s a disease, it’s about having the control you want/need.
In this particular case though, Davis does have something wrong with her.
And people like her are paying the greatest price for ‘obesity’ crusade lies. Imagine what a lonely place that is.
Davis is not “mad”- not that this would make her undeserving in anyway- she has unresolved physiological problems. Her problems are physical rather than mental. Committed fat phobes wish to pretend this is a question of ‘obesity’ is bad, versus fat is good.
When the reality the pursuit of medical progress is the job of medical science professionals not lay people. Just as teachers are there to teach. If the latter choose not to, that would be their choice.
Nothing is stopping the pursuit of knowledge about anatomical function but the desire to trap everyone into calorie restriction dieting. The desire to devalue and maintain the devaluation of fat people enables all this. It allows those trading in the ‘obesity’ cult to continue to get away with maintaining everyone in a state of ignorance.
That ignorance means nothing is available for people like Davis.
Cases like hers need proper effective interventions that come out of objective observation not fiction.
Those who usually go along with this need to look deep into themselves and ask whether they are prepared to continue to see people like Davis perish in order to keep up what is effectively a denial of proper treatment.
It’s actually not her fault that she’s like this, but even if it was, so what? How many accidents, broken limbs, injuries have you or your loved ones had that were totally or partially your/their fault?
Would you expect to be left with your injuries as they were because of that? Fault has no place in medicine we’ve all received or will receive treatment for genuinely ‘self-inflicted’ problems and would expect nothing less.
So why should those at the top of the weight spectrum be any different? Citing fault is a way of refusing treatment.
Davis does not have "food addiction" that is a made up nonsense designed purely fit in with ‘obesity’ lies. You cannot be addicted to that which what you need to exist.
Hence hyperventilation is not addiction to breathing, it is an imbalance. What stops it is a restoring an equilibrium.
Davis has a chronic excess of hunger. The parts that generate hunger are extremely hyperactive in her. This started from a very early age. That over functioning needs to be adjusted. It needs to be switched down, so that she can be freed from the torment of being overwhelmed by an urge to eat.
Until that happens, she's unlikely to be able to continually overrule it indefinitely. And she shouldn’t have to. Anymore than someone with chronic agonising pain should be left to hurt and told, “ignore it.” or “You’re choosing to have pain." "we can't find anything." etc.,
Her body is also stores fat at a very rapid rate, this too requires some means of adjustment, the one doesn’t always follow from the other for some reason.
Calorie restriction dieting makes this excess of hunger worse, as is the case with Davis and others who’ve been told to diet no matter what.
In case it needs to be said, this rebound regain is the same as when a 100lb person keeps losing and re-gaining 5lbs or whatever. It is not unique to fat/ter people. It is a consequence of the anatomical design we all have. Our bodies seek to restore weight that is lost through calorie restriction, regardless of our weight. Slim people are not getting any slimmer despite decades of slimming.
Reversal of weight is entirely possible, it is not fat people who’ve put the brakes on finding out how to achieve that.
Again every person needs to look deep into their hearts and ask whether it is right that those at the top of the weight spectrum should continue to be neglected in this way, for any reason. To be sacrificed and in some cases allowed to die, in order to preserve ‘obesity’ lies.
Demand proper scientific investigation of this and proper treatment that works. Make it crystal clear that you know something more is going on in cases like this and that you want proper investigation and resolution.
Anything less is bullshit.
Studying people according to fat or slim is like....
...specializing in studying the front of the body and not the back. 'obesity' doesn't function as a scientific field. It's at least 100 years old and back then things looked a lot different. Weight is a surface thing an outcome, that's a product of underlying changes, it's those that matter not weight. Furthermore, there needs to be real research into metabolic function and how to alter its course and tweak it. For example, these two children appear to have totally different problems. Ultimately though, the equipment involved in both are the same, they're just behaving differently. The key to resolving either, is the key to either. Fat haters are clueless dupes at best.
Increasingly the fixation is sugar, [its always got to be about food with calorie restrictionists].
For me, this has always been key, stress and its effects on not only your metabolic function. But also your cardio-vascular health.
T/W: Weight loss
how do you feel about fat people who have or are trying to lose weight
Okay, anonymous asked this when my cursor was misbehaving. I had to delete my unfinished 'sent' answer.
I think there should be something available that's worthy of the efforts of anyone wishing to lose weight. Though it has to be said, those who collude along with the 'obesity' hate fest have well and truly sabotaged themselves by advertising the low value they place on their own time and effort and their preparedness to have their attentions diverted into hating fatz, rather than demanding to know why their (calorie restriction only) options are so reprehensible.
Divide and control as they say.
Though I respect those who have a problem with the idea of weight loss and get a lot of their rationale. I'm one of many who think they're wrong. Everyone understands things in the ways that make sense to them.
Proper ways of positively manipulating people's underlying metabolism are there to be discovered and I feel they need to be.
The obesity debacle has shown how much power is in the hands of the professionals and big (pharma) business and what happens when they, for whatever reason, put you on their shit list.
That's not a lesson to forget. Being able to properly alter the underlying function of our bodies-whatever effect that has on weight- is something that has the potential to put us more in control of our own well being.
Especially those currently disenfranchised by inaccessible and/or costly healthcare. The crusade is a massive and indulgent diversion on those who wish to continue to stall progress indefinitely.