Others have already pointed out parts of this statement that demonstrate it being Hunt as opposed to Slaughter (the desire to run, the title) and I would add the fact the fact that it was as much about finding each other as killing each other, but one particular line struck me just now:
“I took my small knife and tucked it away. I thought about testing it on Matis, but there was no way he would have been able to understand what was happening.”
The Hunt is much more focused than the Slaughter. The Murder Club members had decided/agreed to stalk and kill each other, they were each other’s designated prey (and predators, a line the Hunt is fond of blurring). The Slaughter is much more impersonal; it attacks you because you’re in the wrong uniform, or you’re within the blast radius, or you’re there and convenient, and even on the occasions when it does have a specific target, it won’t hesitate to take a stab at anyone in arm’s reach.
There’s also a difference of anticipation. The club members knew they were being actively hunted. With the Slaughter, it’s more that you know it’s a possibility. You might get shot, a bomb might be dropped in your vicinity, you might get mugged, or (warning for mention of abuse, buffer so people can stop reading, buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer) your abuser might get angry and take it out on you tonight. (buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer all clear now) With the Hunt, you might escape, but it’s definitely coming.
Plus there’s just a tonal difference. Slaughter statements are grim, and even if the whole statement isn’t (Grifter’s Bone), the violence itself certainly is. Here, it’s a game between friends. The vibes, as always, are important.
Oh I love the differences between the Hunt and the Slaughter. One is much more controlled and feels a purpose behind it, while the other is much more wild and willing to lash out at ANYONE. It's exciting and very neat to compare, I agree! What do others think?