Cultural complexity surrounding billionaires' sub loss
a friend wrote this on another social media site:
"A terrifying way to die.
"How people were and are reacting to this is a reflection of society and society’s attitudes about — well, society. Would we make such a massive manhunt (or even know about it) if it wasn’t billionaires down there? Would we care more if it didn’t cost $250,000 per ticket (what the average family earns in 5+ years)? Would we find irony if the ruins weren’t the Titanic, a luxury ship specifically made for the wealthy? Would such extreme tourism even exist if there wasn’t a societal chasm between the ultra-rich and the barely-getting-by? Can one be critical and caring at the same time?
"I wish they had been found in time. These are good questions to raise, but it shouldn't be at the cost of human life."
I feel sorry for the billionaire's son who was pressured to go down there. And the pilot, who had to use an Xbox controller to navigate this largely uncertified vehicle. In both their cases, this feels almost criminal.
As for how the world is reacting to the loss overall:
On average, billionaires only get to be that way by hoarding wealth like Smaug, taking wages that, in a just world, would go to the working people who earned that wealth for them. So I understand how it's hard to care when they cause their own deaths doing a dumb thing after having contributed to such widespread suffering.
Perhaps these guys were the hen's teeth of billionaires and had empathy for others, only growing wealthy through patent royalties or such. I seriously doubt it, because wouldn't people who care about others not sleep on a mound of gold? But I appreciate your perspective, that we ought to give them the benefit of the doubt, just in case, to retain our own humanity.
Even so, in an age when most of humankind is suffering under the yoke of very few greedy dragons, it's difficult to feel sympathy for those we perceive as our oppressors.