non passeró quest'esame perché il mio codice morale é troppo forte per poter accettare che x^2+1=-1 #stopviolence #moralcode #traditions #mosmaiorum #positività
seen from China

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from France
seen from France

seen from France

seen from Canada
seen from Greece
seen from Germany

seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from Switzerland
seen from Venezuela

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Israel
non passeró quest'esame perché il mio codice morale é troppo forte per poter accettare che x^2+1=-1 #stopviolence #moralcode #traditions #mosmaiorum #positività
Figlio di un paese che fu grande, e universalmente ammirato, nelle epoche in cui l’amore per la bellezza era considerato una virtù civica....ed ora tutti questi mao mao per le nostre città c'è la stanno togliendo...maledetta politica autolesionista
The Master Class: Philosophy from Examples
“Regulus had forfeited his life both to uphold a promise and to magnify the honor of Rome. Such praise would doubtless have resonated with the Roman public, who had fed on a steady diet of the mos maiorum, that body of customs and exempla borrowed from their ancestors.” - Promises Past: Atilius Regulus and the Dialogue of Natural Law, William R. Nifong
This is a depiction of the Roman goddess Fides, who represented good faith in public affairs and in agreements between two parties. In his article concerning the dialogue of natural law, William R. Nifong first discusses in detail the Roman dedication to Fides, and the way that Roman citizens learned about the values of honor and promise-keeping which were the foundations of that society. In the above passage, he mentions the concept of mos maiorum, the tool that served “ a didactic as well as patriotic end, these stories taught Roamns how to be Roman.”
When I was in high school, I kept two notebooks for my history class notes: one full of notes I took while reading or in class, and one with important people, places and dates. The majority of those were world leaders who had done important things, great or terrible, and therefore needed to know about. I don’t mention this because it’s unusual that I learned lots of names and stories about individuals; quite the contrary, actually. I mention it because this is something that has been done all throughout history and perhaps serves a much deeper purpose than I had really considered until recently.
Since as early as Roman times, perhaps earlier, people have learned about individuals who have had an impact on history, for better or worse. In Rome, these individuals were used to demonstrate, as Regulus does, the importance of upholding promises and executing them in good faith, which was an integral part of being Roman. We learn about people like Martin Luther King, Jr., Adolf Hitler, and a slew of other historical figures in order to teach us about right and wrong. History is not taught simply to test how well a student can memorize information and dates and regurgitate it; we learn about history to understand what it means to be human, and to connect those stories with our own stories.
During the three-day Bertha von Suttner Master Class in the Peace Palace, we did something very similar to this. We learned the stories of individuals who did great work for international peace and women’s rights and suffrage. After that, we spoke as a class of the necessity of creating our own mos maiorum related to peace and justice. We talked largely about the “bad guys”: people who committed atrocity crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide. It took me a little while to make this connection, but during the Master Class, I got to learn about what seems to me to be the mos maiorum of the international peace movement.
“If any married couple in our days offer an attractive type of what the union of a man and a woman may be in the future, when the ecnomic independence of wome will be the rule, and mutual inclination the only reason for marriage, certainly Mr. C. V. Gerritsen and Dr. Aletta Jacobs appraoch that ideal.” - “Dr. Aletta Jacobs and Mr. C.V. Gerritsen” in The Australian Woman’s Sphere, Martina G. Kramers
Some standout individuals - or a pair of individuals, really, include Aletta Jacobs and Carel Gerritsen, Not only are the two of them both influential on their own, but their relationship came to serve as the ideal relationship for feminists worldwide, and to me, as to Martina G. Kramers, approaches the ideal relationship between a man and a woman. The excerpt above is from an article outlining the relationship of Jacobs and Gerritsen in the Australian Woman’s Sphere, an Australian feminist publication, found in The Gerritsen Collection. The couple amassed a collection of various types of literature and periodicals during their lifetime, which is now archived in that collection, which according to its website is the “ greatest single source for the study of women's history in the world.”
Carel Gerritsen and Aletta Jacobs were both committed to furthering the role of of women in society. Jacobs, the first woman doctor in Holland, also fought for her and all women’s right to vote. Gerritsen supported these aims and also, according to Kramers, “[took] every occasion to give women employment [...] he has always supported the cause of women; he is also a strong supporter of peace and arbitration.” During the Master Class, Andrew Blom, a professor at Central Michigan University, talked about their relationship and the way that they interacted, focusing on their relationship and their ultimate decision to marry.
“We both agreed that a legal marriage was out of the question. On the other hand, the only disadvantage to a marriage of ‘free individuals,’ in which both of us maintained our full freedom and economic independence - even continuing to live apart - would be the offense to conventional attitudes. As two completely independent people, we would be able to live, for better or worse, according to our own beliefs. Our union was based on mutual respect and a shared philosophy of life.” - Aletta Jacobs, Memories
“Dionysius of Halicarnassus defined history as philosophy from examples,” says Nifong in his article. The same way that Regulus embodied the Roman virtues of honor and promise-keeping, to me Jacobs and Gerritsen’s relationship embodies the relationship between “free individuals” that would allow freedom for both of them to continue their lives, without one becoming servant to the other. This is the part of the talk that really interested me: it is so important that both Jacobs and Gerritsen were workers for women’s rights and for peace, but even more significant that they live these ideals out in their own lives.
“I pointed out [to Bertha von Suttner] that [her] ideals could be realized only when women had achieved full civil rights. The philosophy of peace would gain government recognition when women’s opinions were also being pressed in parliaments everywhere.” - Aletta Jacobs, Memories
Jacobs says in her memoirs that she speaks to Bertha von Suttner about the idea that men and women must be equal in order to achieve peace, and this is an idea that grew with her throughout her life. Blom talked about her memories of reading John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women when it was first translated into Dutch, and this seems to be where she draws her inspiration from. She states in Memories that she was “alternately inspired, depressed, and terrified by the Dutch version: The Slavery of Woman, “ and that it became her “personal touchstone.”
This is interesting because John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill as a couple were another forward-thinking union between two individuals working for a similar goal. The Mills both publish similar works related to women’s rights and women’s roles in a marriage. After her father read this book aloud to her family, Jacobs became interested in and began to work for later in her life women’s right and suffrage, becoming someone who inspires others, like those at the master class, to work for the same things. To me, it’s cool that Jacobs was influenced by the Mills, because ultimately she and Gerritsen became an influential couple as well.
Just as Regulus makes a promise as an individual on behalf of a nation, Jacobs and Gerritsen live their individual lives on behalf of a much larger ideal: women’s rights and through them, peace. Becoming educated on something through stories has already been a theme throughout this class, and it was continued in the Master Class as we learned about Carel Gerritsen and Aletta Jacobs. During this class, we created a sort of mos maiorum on individuals that really live out the idea of peace and equality in not only their work, but their personal lives, which to me adds a much deeper meaning to their work as peace activists.