Cryptozoology studies creatures that science can't explain. They call them cryptids. This includes Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster. Many seek proof. Mysterious cryptid sightings have a long history. Let's look at this topic in different ways. Perhaps it will change how you feel about cryptozoology in popular culture.The goal is to help you answer a question about your own beliefs. What do you think? Is cryptozoology science or pseudoscience? To find the answer, we must examine the history, processes used, and the evidence.The controversy around cryptozoology ebbs and flows. There are two extreme camps. One side says it is a valid form of scientific study. On the other side, some say it is just myth, superstition, and conspiracy theories.Is Cryptozoology Science or Pseudoscience?To determine if cryptozoology is a science or pseudoscience, we need to know what science is.Science starts with questions. It makes guesses, called hypotheses. Then, it tests these guesses and gathers compelling evidence. Scientists don't believe in something because they want it to be true. They look for proof—things like bones, DNA, fossils, or live animals. They share their results with other scientists. These scientists check the work to ensure it's fair and correct. Researchers call this process peer review.Defining the SubjectWhere does the term cryptozoology come from? Crypto is a Latin word for hidden or secret. Zoology is the study of animals. The goal is to learn how and why animals behave and their unique relationship to the environment.Scientific inquiry begins with the goal of solving some mysteries, just like pseudoscience. However, science uses evidence to provide answers, whereas pseudoscience presents unproven propositions.The results of pseudoscience are not factual. Pseudoscience presents hypotheses often based on eyewitness accounts. It often uses faulty premises, flawed experimental design, or insufficient data.Cryptozoology is the search for the existence of mythological creatures. It starts with the same intent as science; it simply lacks evidence to support its claims. Is cryptozoology science or pseudoscience? Read the full article