#openaccessconsumers

[energylineindia1]

Open Access Consumers case sees CSERC reject contempt route

Open Access Consumers tracking cross-subsidy surcharge cases should note CSERC’s 8 June 2026 order in Petition No. 14 of 2022. The Commission dismissed CSPDCL’s plea seeking action under Sections 142 and 146 of the Electricity Act against Bharat Aluminium Company. Open Access Consumers are affected because the case arises from a 27 July 2016 cross-subsidy-surcharge order linked to 2014-15 open-access power. EnergylineIndia.com highlights this update for readers tracking State electricity regulator orders and APTEL orders. CSERC reasoned that the dispute is already pending in Review Petition No. 04 of 2026, making contempt action inappropriate at this stage. The Commission granted CSPDCL liberty to refile later. Open Access Consumers should read the order as a procedural development rather than a final settlement of surcharge liability. The issue remains open because the review petition is still pending. Open Access Consumers disputes often involve multiple layers: original tariff or surcharge order, review proceedings, enforcement request and possible penalty action. Open Access Consumers should watch whether CSPDCL revives enforcement after the review matter is decided.

[indianpetroplus]

Open Access Consumers

Open Access Consumers

Open access consumers get relief against unfair billing APTEL has ruled that DISCOMs cannot overcharge open access consumers In a landmark judgment, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) has ruled in favor open access consumers striking down the billing methodology used by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL). The tribunal held that wheeling and transmission charges must be levied only on actual power consumption at the consumer’s end—not on the sanctioned capacity or injected power at the generation point, open access consumers, energylineindia