perhaps one of the troubling things which show white privilege in the context of Singapore(as the man I'm about to talk about is the "founder" of it, but this could apply to Southeast Asia as well) is the rafflesia, the world’s smelliest flower, being named after Sir Stamford raffles himself (while some argue that this credit should go to his assistant, another white man, Dr Joseph Arnold, it was his Indonesian tour guide that led him to it), when the natives of some parts of Southeast Asia where the flower is found, (so the people of Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Malaysia) were already exposed to and knew of the flower, but it was a white man who “discovered it” and took credit as the leader of the exploration, and this same white man sent off the discoveries about the flower to a white man’s society of flora and fauna or something that it was then named the “rafflesia”, thereby implying (or outright saying!) that things are only “found” or have value accorded to them when it is a white man that “finds it” and the experiences or discoveries of people that are not white and are also victims of colonisation, by the way, are not valid until then.