pawsibleclaws replied to your post “when you reblog something that says "your kink is not my kink" are you...”
I'm saying that the OP of the post you reblogged has argued and reblogged posts defending ALL ships even pedophilic ones. There're a lot of fucked up people and some of them WILL call pedophile bullshit a kink. When we say all content is valid content that's an argument that a LOT of harmful people make. That's why it sends red flags for me and a lot of other people.
Ok, so what I’m getting from this is what you are trying to say is: “Hey, Jacqui, just to let you know, the OP of that post you blogged often says and means XXXX, thought you should know”
And *NOT* what you actually said, which was: “Hey Jacqui, do you advocate for paedophilia? You must, because you reblogged a post that said absolutely nothing about paedophilia at all!”
There is a very big difference between the meaning of the two statements. I am just going to go ahead and believe that you meant the first one and had only good intentions at heart and certainly didn’t mean to dramatise and accuse people for no reason just to start shit.
