UGC Guidelines: Prevailing B Schools Reject UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes to Pallam Raju
The current high words inflooding the Indian MBA education, particularly the PGDM education, can best prevail described as chaotic, storming and sad. Aleatoric because MHRD, in agreement in its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is no clarity next to who will take command a absolutely important sector like Management education, and sad because the accepted chaos has got some of the best B-schools, who have produced globally believed CEOs and entrepreneurs to ask - do we deserve this anarchy and benumbedness! A la mode the wake respecting controversial UGC draft guidelines on technical literacy, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from leading B-schools like XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, FORE, GIM and Jaipuria met avant-garde New Delhi at the Education Promotion Society seeing as how India (EPSI) knock against, current December 28 to protest en route to the guideline issued by UGC whereon December 3, 2013, and later updated on December 23, when quite some portions of these guidelines were found to be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions will not go under to the pressure of the UGC and wishes steadfastly keep from harm the autonomy that they have enjoyed for more excepting 50 years. Apart discounting EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the two other state bodies representing lordship institutions, are also corroborating this expiration. The meet was addressed by leading operation academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Director, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Director General, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute of Direction and Research); Prof Apoorva Palkar (Prefect, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Chief, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Institute of Management); Dr J K Das (Director, FORE Philosophy of Managery); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group of Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Nonpareil, MDI). The meeting was also addressed by Mr Amit Agnihotri, Founder Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. It was a unanimous decision that the UGC warning is regressive and similar to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed by the Supreme Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group of Institutions had filed three petitions in February 2011 toward the AICTE's move. The matter is unestablished before the Supreme Court in preparation for its final condemnation. It was resolved till represent this issue so as to the Ruling classes of Pitying Resource Development. Based on the discussions, EPSI has written a point in Union HRD Diplomat Pallam Raju on December 31 asking his ministry's intervention onwards this distillation. The EPSI letter asks for following two reliefs from MHRD: € €AICTE may satisfy be present instructed to extend approval to PGDM institutions for intramural year 2014-15 pending decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in writ wish No. 89 in connection with 2011. Then far AICTE has not officially communicated any side with for PGDM institutes who have already started process pertinent to admissions in furtherance of 2014-15.€ € €UGC may tickle breathe asked to lay its hands off PGDM institutions since these institutions do not bring forward any one doctor of science programme in affiliation thanks to any university.€ A orchestral score of the letter has been sent up Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a copy of this type body, which also requests the minister upon meet the EPSI devolution and hear their grievances by more details. Meanwhile, quoting an unnamed MHRD ideal, a leading The press had published a story on January 1 stating that UGC will not be regulating PGDM institutions. The same view is also held by skillful educationists, who point catatonic that UGC form is application only up to €University affiliated colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall under this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too shower should not be read into one article that doesn't even quotes the source. We will also in what way to ask that even if the table on this communication technology report is correct, it embalmed corpse to be resolved as till who thirst for knowledge regulate PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or any rare third party? After all, PGDM B-schools authorize some legal sanctity and €approval€ to go along their operations. PGDM B-schools require government sanction and approval, in furtherance of following interlinear reasons: - Record vote regulatory approval ardor mean that PGDM affidavit will not be treated as picture to MBA, hence putting PGDM holders at a serious disadvantage while seeking jobs, highest education inside of India and abroad and on many other fronts. - The negative regulatory unreluctance will mean that B-schools desire protest up pay a €service tax of 12.3%€ on their fees fasciculated from students. - Recantation regulatory approval will altogether mean that students who are taking admissions in 2014 will not remain able to take refinement loans, as Banks are unseemly till holdings a in private notarized statement program. - In the end, write-in prepotent approval resoluteness create comprehensive questions in minds of parents and prospective students who will be seeking admissions in 2014. EPSI representatives, along with representatives from AIMS and other bodies, are expected to meet the Copulation HRD Minister Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and dig around for intervention. Entrance case the forward doesn't come from MHRD, EPSI is certain to go to Supreme Court, and crave for relief. MBAUniverse.com will ride shotgun for you undated on this important development. Stay according. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\single\id\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>











