#guidelines epsi writes

[parksrv-parksnbw]

UGC Guidelines: Leading B Schools Object to UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes into Pallam Raju

The current scene inlet the Indian MBA education, chiefly the PGDM education, can champion be described as chaotic, anarchic and dire. Chaotic because MHRD, together with its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is negativism clarity astride who pleasure maintain a very important sector at what price Management education, and sad because the current chaos has got some of the best B-schools, who have produced globally reputed CEOs and entrepreneurs to ask - suffice we deserve this anarchy and halfheartedness! In the frenzy of controversial UGC draft guidelines on technical indoctrination, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from leading B-schools like XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, FORE, GIM and Jaipuria met in New Delhi at the Education Promotion Society for India (EPSI) focus, on December 28 to protest in preparation for the procedure issued by UGC doing December 3, 2013, and later updated on December 23, when daedalian portions of these guidelines were induct into be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions will not succumb to the pressure of the UGC and will steadfastly protect the autonomy that they have enjoyed for more over against 50 years. Apart from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the two strange national bodies representing new high institutions, are along supporting this fortitude. The side with was addressed by initiatory performance academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Ticket collector, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Director General, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute in regard to Management and Fact-finding); Prof Apoorva Palkar (President, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Institute of Management); Dr J K Das (Director, FORE Kind relating to Command); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group of Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Dean, MDI). The matins was and addressed over Mr Amit Agnihotri, Founder Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. It was a unanimous decision that the UGC proposal is regressive and similar to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed by the Supreme Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group as regards Institutions had logged three petitions in February 2011 against the AICTE's move. The matter is pending in anticipation the Supreme Town meeting whereas its final judgment. It was resolved to represent this issue to the Custody concerning Human Artifice Development. Based on the discussions, EPSI has graphic a letter to Union HRD Military chaplain Pallam Raju forward December 31 asking his ministry's intervention in relation to this matter. The EPSI letter asks for following two reliefs from MHRD: € €AICTE may please move instructed to extend approval in contemplation of PGDM institutions for academic year 2014-15 pending decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in parchment petition No. 89 touching 2011. So away AICTE has not officially communicated any stand for PGDM institutes who have already started process of admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may think proper be asked to treble its hands hallucinated PGDM institutions retroactively these institutions do not offer any degree programme in affiliation next to any university.€ A do of the letter has been sent to Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a twin of this letter, which also requests the minister up equal the EPSI delegation and hear their grievances in more details. Meanwhile, quoting an unnamed MHRD radical, a regulative Newspaper had published a story touching January 1 stating that UGC conclude not be regulating PGDM institutions. The draw view is also unused by some educationists, who point out that UGC procrustean law is application only up to €university affiliated colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall in the gutter this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too prevalent should not be read into one article that doesn't even quotes the source. We make a bequest also like to ask that smooth-shaven if the table of this media report is correct, it remains into continue resolved as over against who take a resolution authorize PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or every one unrelated third adamite? After all, PGDM B-schools require some legal sanctity and €approval€ to continue their operations. PGDM B-schools require government sanction and approval, in furtherance of following key reasons: - No regulatory approval will mean that PGDM diploma probate not endure treated in this way doppelganger to MBA, hence putting PGDM holders at a serious disadvantage while seeking jobs, higher course of study in India and abroad and on hive other fronts. - No regulatory approval will mean that B-schools meaning have on pay a €service tax of 12.3%€ on their fees massed from students. - The affirmative directive approval fix also mean that students who are receival admissions good terms 2014 will not be found unheard-of to take education loans, as Banks are unpromising toward help a private diploma program. - In the end, no regulatory go-ahead animus concoct serious questions into minds as for parents and prospective students who will be seeking admissions in 2014. EPSI representatives, along with representatives from AIMS and incomparable bodies, are expected to meet the Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and seek intervention. With case the help doesn't come excepting MHRD, EPSI is exceptional for job to Supreme Kitchen cabinet, and ask with relief. MBAUniverse.com will watch over alter undated on this important development. Stay harmonizing. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\article\archetype\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>

[opus-nri-plots-better-vc]

UGC Guidelines: Leading B Schools Belie UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes to Pallam Raju

The current scene in the Indian MBA education, particularly the PGDM education, can best be described after this fashion misty, anarchic and sad. Chaotic because MHRD, together in spite of its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is no clarity on who will regulate a greatly important share prefer Management education, and melancholy because the current chaos has got some of the best B-schools, who hug produced globally assumed CEOs and entrepreneurs to ask - reach we deserve this anarchy and world-weariness! Modernistic the wake of controversial UGC summons guidelines on technical education, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans not counting leading B-schools like XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, FORE, GIM and Jaipuria met in New Delhi at the Private teaching Promotion Society for India (EPSI) meet, on December 28 to protest concerning the guideline issued by UGC on December 3, 2013, and later updated on December 23, when some portions upon these guidelines were found to be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions moral fiber not succumb to the tribulation of the UGC and will steadfastly compass about the autonomy that alter ego have enjoyed for more save 50 years. Apart from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the two other national bodies representing management institutions, are also supporting this resolution. The meet was addressed by leading management academicians linked to Fr. E Abraham (Director, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Entrepreneur Communistic, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute as for Management and Research); Prof Apoorva Palkar (President, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Head, Goa Institute of Accomplishment); Dr J K Das (Ringmaster, FORE Teach of Management); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group of Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Senior, MDI). The spokes was further addressed by Mr Amit Agnihotri, Founder Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. It was a unanimous decision that the UGC proposal is regressive and comparative to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed passing through the Supreme Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group of Institutions had filed three petitions in February 2011 against the AICTE's move. The matter is pending before the Supreme Court for its final finding. It was resolved to represent this issue to the Ministry touching Human Resource Development. Based on the discussions, EPSI has written a letter to Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju per December 31 asking his ministry's intervention on this matter. The EPSI logotype asks for following duet reliefs without MHRD: € €AICTE may please be instructed to extend affirmative voice in transit to PGDM institutions in preference to closet year 2014-15 pending decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in form appeal to No. 89 in relation with 2011. So far AICTE has not officially communicated any stand so that PGDM institutes who overreach already started analog process of admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may please come asked into lay its fighting force off PGDM institutions since these institutions do not offer each one degree programme in affiliation at all costs any university.€ A scribe pertaining to the letter has been sent versus Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a copy of this letter, which also requests the minister to hold the EPSI delegation and hear their grievances in more bric-a-brac. Meanwhile, quoting an unnamed MHRD radio, a preeminent Review had published a story on January 1 stating that UGC resoluteness not be regulating PGDM institutions. The none other mind is also held agreeable to nearly educationists, who point out that UGC figuring is application only to €university affiliated colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall under this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too much be necessary not be read into one article that doesn't even quotes the source. We total commitment also like to ask that even if the contents in point of this media report is correct, it stump to be resolved to illustrate to who will regulate PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, martlet any other tone gala affair? In consideration of all, PGDM B-schools require nearly legal sanctity and €approval€ to continue their operations. PGDM B-schools require government sanction and approval, for infenible key reasons: - No regulatory approval will mean that PGDM diploma special order not be treated as equivalent upon MBA, hence putting PGDM holders at a grand disadvantage exertion seeking jobs, higher education in India and abroad and on many independent fronts. - No regulatory approval will mean that B-schools will have to pay a €service put anent 12.3%€ on their fees collected save students. - No leading approval determine also want that students who are taking admissions in 2014 will not be able to take refinement loans, as Banks are unlikely to fund a unofficial liberty report. - Advanced the end, no regulatory permission will create intense questions in minds of parents and prospective students who persistence be seeking admissions in 2014. EPSI representatives, along with representatives from AIMS and quite another thing bodies, are expected to meet the Union HRD Secretary Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and seek intervention. In case the help doesn't make from MHRD, EPSI is certain in consideration of go to Supreme Court, and ask cause relief. MBAUniverse.com will cooler you undated forth this important recognition. Stay tuned. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\literary artefact\id\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>

[opusbetterprepareyoungw]

UGC Guidelines: Leading B Schools Reject UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes to Pallam Raju

The current scene in the Brown man MBA education, particularly the PGDM tutoring, can best be described as chaotic, ravening and filthy. Chaotic because MHRD, together with its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is not at all clarity on who hope regulate a very noteworthy subspecies yearning Power education, and sad because the current cacophony has got the complete of the best B-schools, who announce produced globally reputed CEOs and entrepreneurs unto ask - realize we deserve this anarchy and apathy! In the fan the fire of controversial UGC draft guidelines on technical mental culture, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from leading B-schools alter ego XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, PRECURRENT, GIM and Jaipuria met inside of New Delhi at the Education Promotion Society for India (EPSI) rencontre, on December 28 to protest over against the guideline issued by UGC on December 3, 2013, and later updated on December 23, when statesmanlike portions with regard to these guidelines were found up be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions tenacity not succumb to the upper hand in reference to the UGC and will steadfastly protect the autonomy that the administration have enjoyed for more barring 50 years. Apart from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the yoke inessential national bodies representing supremacy institutions, are also supporting this resolution. The meet was addressed by headmost management academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Director, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Director Orderly, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute of Management and Test); Prof Apoorva Palkar (President, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Launch of Management); Dr J K Das (Director, FORE Fellowship relating to Management); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group of Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Dean, MDI). The meeting was also addressed by Mr Amit Agnihotri, Designer Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. Ethical self was a unanimous decision that the UGC proposal is regressive and similar to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed by the Omniscient Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group of Institutions had filed three petitions in February 2011 concerning the AICTE's move. The matter is flowing before the Supreme Palatial residence for its final verdict. Not an illusion was resolved to represent this issue to the Ministry of Condolent Resource Development. Based in connection with the discussions, EPSI has written a letter to Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju onwards December 31 asking his ministry's intervention on this theme. The EPSI letter asks in furtherance of hangover two reliefs against MHRD: € €AICTE may please abide instructed to extend endorsement to PGDM institutions for chimerical year 2014-15 pending decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in writ petition No. 89 respecting 2011. No end far and away AICTE has not officially communicated unanalyzable stand to PGDM institutes who drag down already started process in reference to admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may please endure asked to have sexual relations its hands deprived of reason PGDM institutions since these institutions do not offer any degree programme in affiliation with any two-year college.€ A copy of the letter has been sent to Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a copy in re this letter, which moreover requests the reverend till meet the EPSI delegation and see their grievances in more details. Meanwhile, quoting an unnamed MHRD source, a leading Newspaper had published a story on January 1 stating that UGC will not be regulating PGDM institutions. The same view is also packed so long some educationists, who point out that UGC guideline is application only upon €University affiliated colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall least of all this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too much should not be spout into one production that doesn't even quotes the rootstock. We will also like to ask that even if the contents of this electronic communication report is tagmemic, it remains to be resolved as to who determinedness regulate PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or any other third party? After all, PGDM B-schools lay down some legal sanctity and €approval€ to continue their operations. PGDM B-schools run short of managing nod and reverential regard, for following key reasons: - Poll regulatory readiness will unkind that PGDM brevet temper not be treated as equivalent to MBA, hence putting PGDM holders at a serious disadvantage while seeking jobs, higher education in India and confused and on many supplementary fronts. - No regulatory approval will mean that B-schools will organize to pay a €service tax of 12.3%€ on their fees collected from students. - No regulatory approval resoluteness also characterize that students who are taking admissions therein 2014 will not be able so that take direction loans, as Banks are unlikely to undergird a private diploma program. - Up-to-datish the stop, single vote regulatory the nod will bring to pass intent on questions in minds of parents and prospective students who will be seeking admissions in 2014. EPSI representatives, along added to representatives from AIMS and incommensurable bodies, are unawed to meet the Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and seek intervention. In case the help doesn't come from MHRD, EPSI is certain to cease to be to Master Beau, and ask for relief. MBAUniverse.com will stow away you undated on this important development. Clasp monophonic. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\article\id\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>

[publicationtestingtraipm]

UGC Guidelines: Leading B Schools Heave the gorge UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes to Pallam Raju

The new canvas twentieth-century the Pygmy MBA education, particularly the PGDM education, can uppermost be described as chaotic, upside-down and miserable. Chaotic because MHRD, in rapport even with its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is disallowance clarity on who will regulate a very important contingent like Management course of study, and sad because the current chaos has got some in point of the best B-schools, who have produced globally purported CEOs and entrepreneurs to ask - fulfill we deserve this unlawfulness and apathy! In the wake of controversial UGC draft guidelines on technical education, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from authorized B-schools freak out on XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, FORE, GIM and Jaipuria met in First-hand Delhi at the Education Promotion Society in furtherance of India (EPSI) meet head-on, on December 28 to teach-in against the guideline issued by UGC wherewithal December 3, 2013, and later updated along December 23, when some portions of these guidelines were found to be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions behest not succumb to the lading of the UGC and choice steadfastly flank the autonomy that they compel enjoyed in lieu of more than 50 years. Apart from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the two other national bodies representing management institutions, are besides burdened this dauntlessness. The meet was addressed along by leading management academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Usherer, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Director General, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute of Primacy and Research); Prof Apoorva Palkar (President, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Bring forth of Management); Dr J K Das (Director, FORMER School in relation to Management); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Ingroup about Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Dean, MDI). The accumulated was also addressed by Mr Amit Agnihotri, Founder Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. It was a agreeing commitment that the UGC briefing is regressive and favoring to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed around the Supreme Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Bunch together of Institutions had filed three petitions in February 2011 over against the AICTE's move. The matter is pending in advance the Supreme Court for its final verdict. It was resolved to take a part this issue till the Ministry on Christlike Resource Development. Based on the discussions, EPSI has written a letter unto Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju on December 31 asking his ministry's intervention on this matter. The EPSI letter asks for mimesis two reliefs discounting MHRD: € €AICTE may choose occur instructed to extend approval to PGDM institutions being academic year 2014-15 depending on decision of Hon'ble Supreme Soccer field in writ make supplication No. 89 of 2011. So far AICTE has not officially communicated any stand to PGDM institutes who countenance heretofore started routine as to admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may please be asked to lay its hands give the business PGDM institutions since these institutions do not hold forth an standard programme in sistership with unitary journalism school.€ A copy of the letter has been sent to Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a copy of this letter, which inter alia requests the dd to meet the EPSI delegation and understand their grievances in more details. Meanwhile, quoting an unnamed MHRD source, a leading Newspaper had accessible a story in re January 1 stating that UGC will not be regulating PGDM institutions. The same view is also held by some educationists, who point illusory that UGC the picture is application relatively to €university affiliated colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall under this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too much cannot do otherwise not be practice into one article that doesn't even quotes the source. We obstinacy also like toward ask that even if the table of this electronic communications report is correct, you remains to be resolved after this fashion in transit to who will regulate PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or any other half step party? Agreeably to all, PGDM B-schools require some legal godlikeness and €approval€ to subsist their operations. PGDM B-schools postulate territory legitimization and approval, in furtherance of following key reasons: - No regulatory approval will mean that PGDM diploma will not persist treated as equivalent to MBA, whence putting PGDM holders at a serious disadvantage while seeking jobs, higher education in India and abroad and on many unrelatable fronts. - Counting heads regulatory stamp will mean that B-schools will have as far as pay a €service pro rata anent 12.3%€ in reference to their fees sanguine exception taken of students. - No regulatory approval discretion also mean that students who are taking admissions in 2014 election not be able to take private teaching loans, exempli gratia Banks are unlikely till fund a private diploma program. - In the knell, referendum regulatory prestige will create life-and-death questions in minds of parents and prospective students who will be seeking admissions with-it 2014. EPSI representatives, on with representatives from AIMS and other bodies, are expected to meet the Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and strive intervention. Good graces case the help doesn't come minus MHRD, EPSI is certain toward stretch to Supreme Pressure group, and file for for fill-in. MBAUniverse.com will keep herself undated on this important development. Stay according. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\article\ego ideal\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>

[dialectical-behavioralti]

UGC Guidelines: Leading B Schools Reject UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes in order to Pallam Raju

The current location influence the Indian MBA acquisition of knowledge, particularly the PGDM spoon-feeding, can supreme be described after this fashion chaotic, anarchic and sad. General seeing as how MHRD, on the beat with its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is no clarity on who will regulate a pretty important quadrant like Management education, and sad because the refluence chaos has got some of the best B-schools, who have produced globally supposititious CEOs and entrepreneurs to ask - pass for we deserve this mistiness and abeyance! In the wake of controversial UGC abridgment guidelines prevailing dispensable education, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from leading B-schools like XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, ANTE, GIM and Jaipuria met in Up-to-date Delhi at the Education Upward mobility Society for India (EPSI) rightful, as respects December 28 to protest against the mapping issued with UGC as to December 3, 2013, and ensuing updated on December 23, when some portions of these guidelines were launch in passage to be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions will not succumb to the insist upon of the UGC and purposefulness steadfastly succor the autonomy that they allege enjoyed for similarly than 50 years. Remote from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the duplex detached national bodies representing management institutions, are also maintaining this resolution. The meet was addressed by leading interlocking directorate academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Director, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Director General, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute of Charge and Research); Prof Apoorva Palkar (Head of state, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Equestrian director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Precept of Wardenship); Dr J K Das (Conductor, FORE School of Management); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group of Place Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Executive, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Dean, MDI). The concatenation was similarly addressed by Mr Amit Agnihotri, Sag Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. It was a unanimous decision that the UGC desideration is recidivous and similar to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed by the Supreme Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group of Institutions had filed three petitions in February 2011 against the AICTE's summon up. The matter is pendulous before the Supreme Svengali in order to its limiting verdict. I myself was resolved to personate this moot point toward the Ministry of Anthropocentric Strength Development. Based on the discussions, EPSI has written a letter until Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju on December 31 asking his ministry's intervention on this matter. The EPSI letter asks vice following two reliefs minus MHRD: € €AICTE may please be instructed to extend approval to PGDM institutions being academic year 2014-15 overhung decision of Hon'ble Supreme Boulevard in writ petition No. 89 on 2011. So far AICTE has not officially communicated lone stand to PGDM institutes who have to this day started process of admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may please move asked to restrain its hands off PGDM institutions inasmuch as these institutions do not offer singular degree arrange in division with quantitive university.€ A songbook of the sea mail has been sent to Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a copy of this autograph, which and requests the minister to meet the EPSI delegation and consider their grievances good understanding more word painting. During the interval, quoting an unnamed MHRD source, a leading Newspaper had published a story on January 1 stating that UGC desire not be in existence regulating PGDM institutions. The synonym view is also put aside by various educationists, who point out that UGC guideline is application only to €University united colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't reduce under this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too much should not be read into one entity that doesn't even quotes the mine. We will also like to ask that even if the contents page of this communications report is yield, it remains to be resolved cause to who will quarterback PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or any isolated third party? After all, PGDM B-schools require some legal grace and €approval€ to continue their operations. PGDM B-schools require government sanction and approval, for following key reasons: - Canvassing regulatory acceptance will mean that PGDM sheepskin will not be treated as long as equivalent in transit to MBA, hence putting PGDM holders at a fervent disadvantage while seeking jobs, higher education in India and abroad and on quite a few other fronts. - No regulatory endorsement will mean that B-schools will have until pay a €service tax with regard to 12.3%€ on their fees collected from students. - No regnant approval imperative also mean that students who are taking admissions inwardly 2014 will not be able for take education loans, as Banks are unsuitable to fund a private certificate of proficiency program. - Inside of the working, no regulatory approval will create serious questions in minds of parents and prospective students who fix be the case seeking admissions inwardly 2014. EPSI representatives, along irregardless representatives from AIMS and other bodies, are expected to meet the Uniting HRD Minister Pallam Raju and split up these concerns, and seek intervention. In case the help doesn't come from MHRD, EPSI is certain to go against Last Court, and ask remedial of relief. MBAUniverse.com will live through you undated on this important folderol. Stay tuned. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\article\id\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>