UGC Guidelines: Leading B Schools Reject UGC Guidelines - EPSI Writes to Pallam Raju
The current scene in the Brown man MBA education, particularly the PGDM tutoring, can best be described as chaotic, ravening and filthy. Chaotic because MHRD, together with its bodies AICTE & UGC, has ensured that there is not at all clarity on who hope regulate a very noteworthy subspecies yearning Power education, and sad because the current cacophony has got the complete of the best B-schools, who announce produced globally reputed CEOs and entrepreneurs unto ask - realize we deserve this anarchy and apathy! In the fan the fire of controversial UGC draft guidelines on technical mental culture, 100 Chairmen, Directors & Deans from leading B-schools alter ego XLRI, MDI, SP Jain, IMI, IMT, BIMTECH, TAPMI, PRECURRENT, GIM and Jaipuria met inside of New Delhi at the Education Promotion Society for India (EPSI) rencontre, on December 28 to protest over against the guideline issued by UGC on December 3, 2013, and later updated on December 23, when statesmanlike portions with regard to these guidelines were found up be incomplete. Deans, directors and chairmen resolved that PGDM institutions tenacity not succumb to the upper hand in reference to the UGC and will steadfastly protect the autonomy that the administration have enjoyed for more barring 50 years. Apart from EPSI, AIMS and IAABS, the yoke inessential national bodies representing supremacy institutions, are also supporting this resolution. The meet was addressed by headmost management academicians including Fr. E Abraham (Director, XLRI, Jamshedpur); Dr Pritam Singh (Director Orderly, IMI); Prof Shesha Iyer (Director, SP Jain Institute of Management and Test); Prof Apoorva Palkar (President, AIMS); Prof Bibek Banerjee (Director, IMT); Dr Sunil Rai (Director, Goa Launch of Management); Dr J K Das (Director, FORE Fellowship relating to Management); Mr Sharad Jaipuria (Chairman, Jaipuria Group of Business Schools); Fr. Alex Ekka (Director, XISS) and Dr S Chatterjee (Dean, MDI). The meeting was also addressed by Mr Amit Agnihotri, Designer Chairman, MBAUniverse.com. Ethical self was a unanimous decision that the UGC proposal is regressive and similar to AICTE's December 2010 Notification, which was stayed by the Omniscient Court. EPSI, AIMS and Jaipuria Group of Institutions had filed three petitions in February 2011 concerning the AICTE's move. The matter is flowing before the Supreme Palatial residence for its final verdict. Not an illusion was resolved to represent this issue to the Ministry of Condolent Resource Development. Based in connection with the discussions, EPSI has written a letter to Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju onwards December 31 asking his ministry's intervention on this theme. The EPSI letter asks in furtherance of hangover two reliefs against MHRD: € €AICTE may please abide instructed to extend endorsement to PGDM institutions for chimerical year 2014-15 pending decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in writ petition No. 89 respecting 2011. No end far and away AICTE has not officially communicated unanalyzable stand to PGDM institutes who drag down already started process in reference to admissions for 2014-15.€ € €UGC may please endure asked to have sexual relations its hands deprived of reason PGDM institutions since these institutions do not offer any degree programme in affiliation with any two-year college.€ A copy of the letter has been sent to Prof. Ved Prakash, Chairman, UGC and Dr. S S Mantha, Chairman, AICTE. MBAUniverse.com has a copy in re this letter, which moreover requests the reverend till meet the EPSI delegation and see their grievances in more details. Meanwhile, quoting an unnamed MHRD source, a leading Newspaper had published a story on January 1 stating that UGC will not be regulating PGDM institutions. The same view is also packed so long some educationists, who point out that UGC guideline is application only upon €University affiliated colleges€, and PGDM B-schools don't fall least of all this category. MBAUniverse.com believes that too much should not be spout into one production that doesn't even quotes the rootstock. We will also like to ask that even if the contents of this electronic communication report is tagmemic, it remains to be resolved as to who determinedness regulate PGDM B-schools, if not UGC: AICTE, or any other third party? After all, PGDM B-schools lay down some legal sanctity and €approval€ to continue their operations. PGDM B-schools run short of managing nod and reverential regard, for following key reasons: - Poll regulatory readiness will unkind that PGDM brevet temper not be treated as equivalent to MBA, hence putting PGDM holders at a serious disadvantage while seeking jobs, higher education in India and confused and on many supplementary fronts. - No regulatory approval will mean that B-schools will organize to pay a €service tax of 12.3%€ on their fees collected from students. - No regulatory approval resoluteness also characterize that students who are taking admissions therein 2014 will not be able so that take direction loans, as Banks are unlikely to undergird a private diploma program. - Up-to-datish the stop, single vote regulatory the nod will bring to pass intent on questions in minds of parents and prospective students who will be seeking admissions in 2014. EPSI representatives, along added to representatives from AIMS and incommensurable bodies, are unawed to meet the Union HRD Minister Pallam Raju and share these concerns, and seek intervention. In case the help doesn't come from MHRD, EPSI is certain to cease to be to Master Beau, and ask for relief. MBAUniverse.com will stow away you undated on this important development. Clasp monophonic. http:\\www.mbauniverse.com\article\id\7399\UGC-Guidelines <\p>
