seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Lithuania
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Austria
seen from Russia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Austria
Here is the evidence that Moon was NOT the originator of DP even though he repeatedly said he was and this was a major basis of his claim to be the Messiah. One massive lie underpinning another one! Don't just see the title and say 'Oh, that's old news'! This video specifically discusses the origins of DP.
Moon “had a lot of sexual relationships which were described as being part of some kind of religious, spiritual ritual.” – Eileen Barker
Eileen Barker, right, has studied the Sun Myung Moon organization for over 40 years. She is shown here at the CESNUR Conference on the UM, 2017.
“It is said, and there seems to be a lot of evidence for this, that in the early days [Moon] had a lot of sexual relationships which were described as being part of some kind of religious, spiritual ritual. We are hearing stories over and over again about this. ... the allegations from a lot of women and people, men as well as early followers, does seem to be pretty enormous. It is just not one person who has been making these claims.” Professor Eileen Barker in a radio programme about the Unification Church.
BBC Radio 4 ‘Beyond Belief’ Monday January 7th 2013 LINK
The presenter was Ernie Rea: “Joining me to discuss the Unification Church are Professor Eileen Barker, Director of INFORM, which is an information network focusing on New Religious Movements, George Chryssides, Honorary Research Fellow in Contemporary Religion at the University of Birmingham and Jack Corley, Director of the UK branch of the Unification Church.”
________________________________
In 1984 Professor Eileen Barker wrote:
“But the following year [1955] Moon was imprisoned again. The Unificationists say that this was on a trumped-up charge of draft evasion, but it has also been reported that he was charged with ‘injuring public morals’, or, according to another account, that ‘his indictment was initially draft dodging but was later changed to adultery and promiscuity.’ Similar rumours (which persist to this day in Korea)31 alleged that he was engaging in ritual sexual practices.
31 In conversations with scores of non-Unificationist Koreans the first information I have been given about the Unification Church has, in almost every instance, been that Moon engages (or has engaged) in immoral sexual practices with his followers.”
The Making of a Moonie: Brainwashing or Choice? by Professor Eileen Barker pages 42 and 265
________________________________
Professor Eileen Barker quoted Choi Syn-duk
“In July, 1955, several senior members and four leaders as well as Mr. Moon were imprisoned under an accusation of injuring public morals.”
from Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society No. 43 (1967) pp101-113
Link to Choi’s 1967 article: Korea's Tong-il Movement
Choi Syn-duk (Ch’oe Sin-dok, 崔信德) [was] Associate Professor of Sociology at Ewha Women’s University in Seoul. ... She was once an active member of the Tong-il church and was closely associated with Mun Son-myong.
(The Tong-il Movement is another name for the Unification Church.)
Young-oon Kim said Sun Myung Moon was “a pure virgin until the age of 40”
by Allen Tate Wood
“I also spent a great deal of time with Rev. Young Oon Kim who was one of Mr. Moon's missionaries to the U.S. in the early 60's. I lived in the same house with her from August of 1969 ’til January of 1972. To her credit “Miss Kim”, as we called her, is the only interpreter of Moon's pastiche theology who has been able to write a book about it that makes any pretence of honoring the conventions of grammar, and logic. The theology for those who study it closely and for those interested in the chronology of Korean messianism is largely derived from the teachings of Park Tae-seon. It was Miss Kim who first told me about Mr. Moon's journeys in the spirit world. It was in the summer of 1970 shortly before I was to head off to Vietnam, Cambodia, Japan and finally Korea, I drove her down to Monticello from Washington. There in Thomas Jefferson’s gardens she talked to me about great Men who had had mistresses, Jefferson, Roosevelt, Eisenhower. She said, these great men, these world movers cannot be held to the same standards of morality as the common man. She knew that the messiah that I was following had been “a pure virgin ’til he was 40 years old”. This is what she had taught us in America. At that time the general American members were not spiritually strong enough to withstand the real truth that he had been married at least three times. Miss Kim was trying to prepare me for what I might discover on my Asian trip, that “the pure virgin ’til he was 40” was just a little “heavenly deception” to tide me over until my commitment to “father and the movement” had transcended the narrow limits of my notions of honesty and integrity. A month later in Japan I was introduced at dinner to [Sung Jin], Mr. Moon’s son by his first wife. In 1970 he was [24] years old.”
LINK
Young Oon Kim lied. Here she is with Moon and his son:
Sun Myung Moon, Sung-jin Moon (born in 1946, his mother was Sun-kil Choi) and Young-oon Kim in Korea in 1957 or 1958. It has been reported that Moon and Young-oon Kim had a very close relationship at this time.
Sun Myung Moon appealed to our sympathy. We trusted him. He blatantly lied to us.
Hyung Jin puts the topic of the Six Marys back on the table. He accuses the FFWPU of being ashamed of the Six Marys, and that the FFWPU wants to hide this aspect of Moon’s ministry. He also points out the FFWPU’s heresy of claiming that Hak Ja Han "saved" Moon from "weakness of the flesh". He opens up about the Six Marys at 25 min.
The Tragedy of the Six Marys
The Tragedy of the Six Marys
Mormons Believe God Had Sex With Mary
God had sex with Mary to conceive Jesus…”Therefore, the Father and Mother of Jesus, according to the flesh, must have been associated together in the capacity of husband and wife; hence the Virgin Mary must have been, for the time being, the lawful wife of God the Father…He had a lawful right to overshadow the Virgin Mary in the capacity of a husband, and beget a Son, although she was espoused to another…” (Apostle Orson Pratt, the Seer, p. 158)
"…The man Joseph, the husband of Mary, did not, that we know of, have more than one wife, but Mary the wife of Joseph had another husband." (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, 11:268)
"…Now remember from this time forth, and forever, that Jesus Christ was not begotten by the Holy Ghost.” (Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 1:50-51)
"Jesus Christ is the Son of Elohim, both as spiritual and bodily offspring; that is to say, Elohim is literally the Father of the spirit of Jesus Christ and also of the body in which Jesus Christ performed His mission in the flesh…" (James Talmage, The Articles of Faith, pp. 466-467)
http://www.sharpenedswords/com/page/page/3770650.htm
Sun Myung Moon also believed like Mormons that God could have sex, quite literally, with a human woman or women. The grandmother Pak Wol-yong in Pyongyang had sex with God and was called the “wife of Jehovah”. By having sexual intercourse with God she became God’s wife in flesh and could transfer her divinity further to fallen men. Sun Myung Moon and her other male followers got a new spiritual body (yongch’e) or new blood lineage (pikareum) from her through sexual intercourse.
Sun Myung Moon claims that Jesus’ mother Mary failed in her mission because she did not have sex with Jesus. But Mary did not need to be purified by Jesus if she was the “wife of Jehovah” like grandmother Pak Wol-yong in Pyongyang. In that case she got her divinity directly from God through their sexual intercourse. On the contrary, Jesus got his divinity directly from God and his wife, Mary, because God himself had purified the womb of Mary.
Kirsti Nevalainen
Hi I am a third gen in this movement, and I am just wondering if you think that UC movement is "full of hypocrisy", then what other affiliated organizations and movements out in the world has better outcome with less hypocrisy? If you think there is not any, then do you oppose any kind of movement?
All of humanity is hypocritical—one of the few things I learned from Hyung Jin’s book, “A Bald Head and a Strawberry"—, and you will find it in every institution, including religious ones. But this is more than a case of clergy committing sin. This is the Son of God, the Messiah, the Christ, committing the gravest sin, according to Unification theology, in excess. A man who is supposedly under the direct dominion of God committing sexual sin with a number of women in the name of God. There is no consistent way one can reconcile this with the Divine Principle. There are a lot of evils in the Church, but this is probably the loudest, most ridiculous form of hypocrisy in the Unification Church, and it starts at the very top.
The Blessing Has No Spiritual Effect on People
The Blessing of Marriage Ceremony of the UC is merely a modification of the original pikareum sexual rite of the Jesus Church. Sun Myung Moon practiced this concrete sexual rite in his church during the 1940s and through the 1950s until 1962 when the Blessing of Marriage Ceremony replaced this original pikareum ceremony.
The Blessing Ceremony has no spiritual nor physical effect on people. It does not cut them off their satanic blood lineage nor engraft them into the blood lineage of God. It is a pure superstition to believe that.
Kirsti Nevalainen
