#pilotjohnwatsonblog

[pilotscienceofdeduction]

Pet Name Experiment Day 1: Sweetie

Results inconclusive. Subject laughed every time I attempted to test the hypothesis. Examples of tests include:

Test 1 Observer: "Good morning sweetie" Subject: "Piss off Sherlock it's four o'clock in the morning"

Test 2 Observer: "Would you like some more toast, sweetie?" Subject: -muffled laughter due to consumption of previous slice of toast-

Test 3 Observer (high volume as the subject was in another room, could affect results): "Sweetie, we have another case!" Subject: "I can't take you seriously if you call me that, Sherlock."

The subject seems unwilling to participate to his full extent. Will initiate a conversation to explain the purpose and desired result (the result being that any names you would call someone in a vulnerable position or your parents would name you are unsuitable for romantic partners such as ourselves).

Test day 2 will feature the name "darling"

[johnnlocked]

in the pilot john and sherlock are much more open, and something definitely happened after the end of the episode. for me, these rp blogs look like echoes of the canon with minor variations.

I’ve been following these blogs since the beginning and I don’t think you’ve been reading properly; they fucked. Literally fucked. No, they didn’t jump straight into bed after ASIP but they were a lot closer and more open than they were in the actual show. Like... a lot. 

[x] - [x] - [x] - [x] - [x]

Intimacy and romance... it is more than just kissing and sex, you know? Something did happen after their first case; it just wasn’t kissing nor sex. It was something else. Something which could not be put into words and both Sherlock and John knew that. 

These writers just chose to have Sherlock and John grow towards each other instead of taking away the growth of a romantic relationship whilst still getting to know each other. And frankly; that feels a hell of a lot more natural than them having to jump into bed together straight off the bat.

How about you take the time to actually read something before commenting like this? The people who are doing this brought back the joy and love I once felt for this show and I am forever grateful to them, so I’m sorry, but you’ve entered the wrong askbox. I’ll tag, but I doubt I’ll be doing it consistently due to flailing. 

@pilotjohnwatsonblog and @pilotscienceofdeduction ; keep doing what you’re doing! We love you! 

[pilotverseblogs]

Recreating the Pilot!verse

After series 4 of Sherlock ended in a way so many of us were disappointed in, we decided to set up John and Sherlock’s blogs as it would have happened in the pilot universe. Their blogs are:

@pilotjohnwatsonblog

@pilotscienceofdeduction

Today is the 29th January, the day when our boys meet. We can’t wait to start their adventure and show you how it unfolds

The posts that you see will be lifted directly from the official John Watson blog and the Science of Deduction but with some changes that will become important as time goes on.

I suggest when reading the blogs, you go to the official websites and read those too so you can notice the little changes, it’s really fun that way. All of the cases will be the same but as John and Sherlock’s relationship grows there will be some huge differences which should be fun to compare!

The other blogs and commenters are here as well! A list of all of the blogs that are making comments (Mike, Mrs Hudson, Harry etc.) is here so you can track those too if you want to. We want to recreate the entire Sherlock world!

We’re going to be updating this in real time as far as possible. We obviously don’t want to make this last seven years so eventually the posts will be closer together.

If you have any questions feel free to send a message. Note that everything actually on the blogs will be in universe so send your question to this blog.

[pilotscienceofdeduction]

What about "mushroom"?

A mushroom? Why on Earth would I name the man I love after a fungus? 

[pilotscienceofdeduction]

Dear Sherlock Holmes.  I can’t find Bluebell anywhere. Please, please, please can you help? I like to look at your stories and the stories that John Watson has put on here. Is he a real Dr? I know that you try and help people and try to find things that have got lost. Bluebell is not a person so it might not seem important but she is very important. Not like a person but a rabbit. I don’t know what happened but it was funny. Bluebell started to glow at night time. Like a fairy. I went down to the garden and locked her hutch for the night, but when I got there the next morning before went to school she had gone. The hutch was still shut and locked up.  Please, please, please say you’ll help me.  Lots of love Kirsty Stapleton aged 8.

A rabbit. John, I am being messaged about a missing rabbit!

[pilotscienceofdeduction]

Another case closed. Another live saved. All dreadfully riveting and exciting but I need more. Does anyone have something actually interesting for me? Anything? Is the whole world just going to let me die of lethargy???!!!

[pilotscienceofdeduction]

Due to demand, a lack of interesting cases, the impending threat of boredom and in commemoration of John reaching three thousand followers, John and I have decided to do a little Q&A today. 

So, we would appreciate it if you would send us questions (and, please, do try to be interesting). We can be reached, here:

My blog

John’s blog

[pilotscienceofdeduction]

Keep tonight free @pilotjohnwatsonblog; we're going on a date!