I have a gamoverse theory and it's about (what i assume to be) the leaders of farcade and syntax and I believe that they may have originally been from a castlevania like game where the Belmont character later became Warrick while the dracula like character became the leader of farcade. And now how do we know they might be the opposites i believe it might have to do with the reaction towards their planet's destruction where Warrick possibly snapped and realized that this is all for nothing I mean if he really was the Belmont of that planet he would've had friends and family also there would've suffering among his people and all he had to do was end a vampire and his people will become better than ever also in the end of the pilot he wants to "change the rules of the gameovers" now why would he do that when his mission involves destroying planets AND working with the villains of other planets?? He was originally a hero and heroes tend to work with teams and i think he still sees the vampireguy as the villain se he is essentially delaying the inevitable and warrick believes that he is . Now onto the farcade leader (the vampire guy) he was definitely the main villain of his planet however he realized upon his defeat that life might genuinely be cool and now what dies he do? Make sure the hero loses whole the bad guy wins so the planet won't be destroyed and of course there could be an argument that he is simply refilling his bloodlust since he was unable to end Warrick while he was a hero HOWEVER like kit he possibly feels responsible for his planets destruction despite it being the natural order of things he wishes to stop (or atleast delay) a planets destruction i mean think about it unlike syntax farcade have recon missions to properly plan out how to help the villain and also lome we saw with chompers (the shark villain of flappers' planet) not all villains are willing to join syntax and would rather have not had their planet's destroyed which leads back to the vampire guy wanting more planets to live and him having regrets over being defeated because if we also take the dracula comparison further (now granted I haven't played or seen anything castlevania related so take this with a pinch of salt) dracula is usually told as a tragic romantic who was cursed to be this way and now if we apply that to the farcade leader he possibly had his own friends and family who mightve been destroyed by Warrick (when he was a hero) or the planets destruction and so he now vows himself to work with the heroes to ensure a planets survival and also the way he looks at kit in the beginning does show that this hasn't been his first rodeo and although he is helping villains he might be more of an anti villain. Of course there is an argument to be made where there is gonna be a whole "the bad guys where actually the good guys" trope since Warrick does seem to be experimenting with trying to resurrect destroyed planets however I do believe the farcade leader is truly trying to atone for the sins he did back on his own planet and considering he was essentially the key to he feels responsible for that and makes sure no one else shall suffer from that.
Tldr: the leader of syntax might be a mentally insane Simon Belmont while the leader of farcade is dracula with ptsd
