May 7, 2019
Our shield security Pro plugin for WordPress alert you to vulnerable plugins and themes, and automatically upgrade them for you. Buy NOW in just $1.00 p/m.
seen from Belgium
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands
seen from Singapore
seen from Germany
seen from South Africa
seen from Germany
seen from Czechia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Israel
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from Yemen
seen from Malaysia
Our shield security Pro plugin for WordPress alert you to vulnerable plugins and themes, and automatically upgrade them for you. Buy NOW in just $1.00 p/m.
Our shield security Pro plugin for WordPress alert you to vulnerable plugins and themes, and automatically upgrade them for you. Buy NOW in just $1.00 p/m
Our shield security Pro plugin for WordPress alert you to vulnerable plugins and themes, and automatically upgrade them for you. Buy NOW in just $1.00 p/m
Our shield security Pro plugin for WordPress alert you to vulnerable plugins and themes, and automatically upgrade them for you. Buy NOW in just $1.00 p/m
Pro-Internet Security: Week 9
When the 4th Amendment was added to the United States constitution, there was no worldwide Internet, phones hadn’t yet been invented and threats of human trafficking, terrorist attacks and illegal drugs weren’t as rampant as they are in modern day society. To hold steadfast to this archaic belief system, being privacy over safety, is endangering national security. To put your personal privacy above the protection of the citizens of the United States could be called selfish. While many call the government’s surveillance of the Internet a violation of the 4th amendment, it is, in fact, ensuring domestic tranquility and protecting the people. The following example outline scenarios in which call for government surveillance. They show the benefits of security over privacy.
Example 1: The owner of a human trafficking ring enslaved one of your relatives and/or close friends. The government’s only chance in finding her is to search the Internet database, along with browsing through emails of select individuals. However, they are not sure of the exact individual, therefore must dig through countless emails/data collection of potentially innocent citizens of our country. If you’re opposed to this because it violates specific freedoms, let me remind you of the rape, torture and starvation that over 2.5 million people must go through every day as victims of human trafficking. If you’re in support of government surveillance in this case scenario but not others, remember that just because it’s not happening to you, doesn’t mean it’s not happening.
Example 2: The terrorist group known as al-Qaeda has been communicating over email about an upcoming attack on American soil. If the government had access to these emails, they could save hundreds, thousands or even millions of lives. Would you rather the terrorist attack have been executed? Would you rather the government scan the emails of United States citizens to look for domestic threats, or to risk the lives of innocent people, including elderly, children and pregnant women?
Example 3: A college student, a high school student so naïve, stumbles upon a website selling illegal drugs. They settle upon one that’s potentially fatal, unknowingly risking their lives. Wouldn’t it be better for the government have been able to shut down the website than allow the teen to take his life?
I believe that the government of the United States should be allowed to monitor internet/phone activity because of the ever-increasing means of communication through technology, the duty of the United States government to protect its citizens and the high probability of stopping an attack on American citizens/land due to the government catching it early. One of the first statements in the Constitution is that the United States has a duty to “insure domestic Tranquility.” Please explain how compromising national security insures domestic tranquility. Those who value their own personal privacy over the safety of an entire nation should take into consideration the harm they’re executing on the United States. As of date, the government has thwarted over 50+ attacks on American soil. Who knows what would have happened had they not had access to the internet activity of us all?