The Transition from Prehistory to Written History
By I, Peter80, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2416645 The four dots near the center may indicate the lunar cycle and the month that young are born.
Prehistory is the time before we have written records to guide us in understanding the cultures that lived on earth for most of the time humans have been roaming it. There are paintings and carvings that have survived that can give us some clues, but we can't reconstruct much about the peoples that left them beyond conjecture.
By Unknown author - Плочка със знаци - Institute of Balkan Studies with Center for Thracology, Bulgaria - CC BY.https://www.europeana.eu/bg/item/2021502/jspui_handle_pub_83, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=114067889
Protohistory is the term for the transition from a culture not having writing to then having at least a literate class and keeping records, or being recorded by those around them who have a literate class. It can also refer to the time when writing moves from its initial purpose, accounting, for example, to more complete usage in transmitting the everyday thoughts and events of a culture. Confounding the transition is the recording of oral histories, pushing back what can be considered historical to before the advent of an actual historical record.
By MbztOwn work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=25834613
From the advent of writing as a tool of chronology in ancient Egypt and Sumer around 3500 BCE, there have been other cultures that were written about, either as records of conflict or records of trade, both of which would include the diplomatic activities related and often correspondences between the groups. This gives us a historical record for people who don't have their own fully developed writing system. We also have this type of history from the perspective of colonizers, such as when Europeans interacted with Indigenous people groups in the Americas and Oceania. Other examples include the Proto-Three Kingdoms era of Korea and the Yayoi period of Japan, both of which were recorded by China. These records should be examined carefully as those who didn't have a writing system yet were often viewed as barbarians, such as the Germanic and Gaulish people, the Huns, and the Slavs.
By PHGCOMIndusValleySeals.JPG - IndusValleySeals.JPG, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5243844
Proto writing systems like glyphs that seem to serve the purpose of supporting an oral history or possibly as some type of identification system that don't seem to have a meaning that we can understand, for example, the Indus script from the Indus Valley Civilization that we still haven't been able to translate because the inscriptions we can find are too short to give us enough to translate them with, nor have we found any inscriptions with other languages we have translated. Early cuneiform was used largely for keeping track of goods, but because there is a very large amount of cuneiform left behind, we are able to figure out what the older records mean, though those first records still fall within protohistory.
By Photograph: Anthony HuanText: George Smith in 1871 (Public domain) - This file has been extracted from another file, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=91492274
As people began to write their current events, some began to write down their oral histories as well as compiling their current event but also those of events from before the advent of writing or before their own lives. The first people named as historians are Herodotus (484-425 BCE) and Thucydides (460-400 BCE). Both of these viewed history very differently. Herodotus viewed history as being driven by the will of the gods and their intervention while Thucydides viewed history as a series of causes and effects and the actions of humans. The culture of those writing often has an effect on those writing history.