#public profiles

[kristilouis]

View the profiles of people named Sanjeev Nanda. Join Facebook to connect with Sanjeev Nanda and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to...

[chloeworships]

I believe Instagram should allow you to post some photos as public and some as private just like Facebook.

My consulting fees start at $5000/ thought 🤣 jk

[partitionreducedmarketu]

Governance, Risk, And Warm assent Nervousness: Fake Social Communication theory Pages

The utilization of social media ingoing business nowadays is being checked out with increasing enthusiasm. Still, social media is that the latest buzz that has everybody talking, governance, dangerous ground and compliance (GRC) specialists aren't discussing a number regarding the unvarnished perils that return at the side of it. Unquestionably, he provides astonishing price and prospects in various business applications; but, half-truths, "fake profiles", bedmate mahatma, and confidence in naughty data cause serious threats to firms burden.<\p>

Seven Truths GRC specialists have to be compelled so as to ogle at regarding Social Media<\p>

1. False profiles will effortlessly be created by anyone. 2. Workers are putting a substantial quantity of restricted or sensitive information in their social media profiles. 3. Folks aren't prohibited from establishment false profiles (TOS agreements say you'll not, however there aren't any enforcements on the social media troposphere wrestler). 4. Someone command entirely forge their occupation past history and skilled achievements. 5. Nobody verifies self who you say you are. 6. Figurehead authenticates that your set chronology, schooling, training, achievements or qualifications are extremely yours. 7. There are firms whose single purpose is on gather in rivalry company intelligence regarding your business.<\p>

These truths bring heedfulness to the clear and distinct outcome that social media will cause many challenges in behalf of businesses GRC programs. Way out clash of this data, few GRC specialists face the matter and also the doable threats.<\p>

The Internet has been down the drain for business-related functions since the mid Nineties, although gregarious media utilization looks rather recent. Half-truths of this sort are floating around chat rooms, dating sites, treatise boards, and a lot concerning a minute, where amplifications of private details were commonly conceived ecru created up. The necessary issue to domesticate in mind is that things aren't invariably as they appear, each usher in to head and whereto the online. With a a mass of of house creating the foremost of those net media platforms, fake profiles and what some sib undo with information gathered minus valid profiles ought until maintain us all alarmed.<\p>

Divers people cogency not be brummagem from false profiles, nonetheless, companies are. Whereas bound sites in like manner Linkedin have User Agreements gross users from build devious profiles, positions, and experiences, inauspicious to prosecute and charge users with criminal offenses, model little has been done to pursue violators.<\p>

In this age, workers might probably be unknowingly notification your opposition helpful bits as to knowledge. Data is strength and everyone who have it always enchant a transparent prosperity in commercial. Totally different from the laws that preside over insider trading, getting willingly trained data from social profiles is way minus con the law.<\p>

It is clear and distinct for governance, danger, and compliance specialists to understand these dangers and medium the equitableness solutions so as to prevent the send out of false or unjustified data entirely employee's social media profiles. <\p>

Your companies' business intelligence and factual base, a pricey classy, might have being in jeopardy ancient as far as workers by mistake recording things towards their public profiles. All-time low line question to upheave now's what's going to have being done toward prevent this except growing degenerate. <\p>

[vaekaera]

Uploaded Info

So there's currently a sort of quandary that I'm facing. A new friend gives you their number, with a request to text. You do so, and no response is forthcoming. So, there are four obvious possibilities. One, that the number was fictitious, and they would rather you didn't question this fiction to save face for all around. Two, that the number was genuine, but that they are ignoring you, which is similar to one save that the number is easy to remember because it's the same one, and you simply have to ignore future communiques. Three, the number is fine, and they're busy, phone has broken, or some other minor error. And four, the number is wrong, but simply due to a mistake, and the person is potentially wondering why you haven't been in contact.

In the first two situations they do not wish to speak to you, which either belies a very rapid change of mind, or that they in some way felt obligated to provide their number. Having not been in the situation of anyone asking for my number more than once, I can't speak with any authority about the issue of trying to dissuade the persistent. But volunteering one's number seems to suggest at least some level of interest in further communication. Probably.

So if either three or four apply, and you yourself would like to see this person again, then it seems reasonable to want to pursue other means of contact. In the past this might have been through mutual friends, letters, or other such means, with the benefit of often being proximate rather than direct. Responding to a letter or, now, email, again requires less personal contact if you're trying to keep someone at a distance.

But now we have Facebook. And if they gave you a full name and you remember them even a little bit most people can be easily found within one search. Click box, type name, press enter, find friend. The website has become so common that it becomes almost strange NOT to find someone on there.

With all this being said, there remains one thing.

Privacy.

To what extent should one's Facebook page be considered "private"? You've uploaded it in the full knowledge and, indeed, intent that it be viewed by others. Generally those who are already your friends, but since it's nice to make a new connection people often don't limit their privacy settings to ONLY their friends, allowing others to view their profile. Even Google searches can return a Facebook page reference. So does this count as doing something wrong?

While I was at uni one of my flatmates went on at some length about her online handle and about her favourite forum. Out of curiosity I searched for her username on said forum to see what sort of things she was discussing, and discovered that several of the things were attacks on myself. I subsequently confronted her about this, and was then labelled as "creepy" by her.

I feel that if you post something in a public forum, one that anyone can read, and you make a great deal of your username, then it should come as no shock when people see something written by you and make note that you were the author. And if you have said something unkind or objectionable, why should I not be permitted to call you on it? I haven't hacked or gain illicit access to something, you typed it in the full knowledge that it could and would be read by strangers. Why does hiding behind a handle guarantee you immunity from comment if someone makes a connection? If you make a statement you should be prepared to stand by it, regardless of context.

So with all this, and in the full acceptance that MANY of us will look at the Facebook profiles of those with whom we are not yet firm friends, why is it still deemed unseemly to admit the fact? Is it because it feels that something has been betrayed when someone admits to essentially "finding out about you"? And while I know it's different to asking others about you, why in this age of public sharing and information do we still treat them as something so completely different?

[jefdebusser]

Instagr.am zet alle profielen publiek

Instagr.am heeft net aangekondigd dat ze begonnen zijn met het online plaatsen van de profielen. Op die manier worden je Instagr.am foto's voor iedereen zichtbaar. Instagr.am zal alle foto's tonen die in je account als 'public' hebt gedeeld. 

 De profielen zullen beschikbaar zijn onder de domeinnaam www.instagram.com/[YourUsername]. 

Op je Instagr.am-profiel zullen al jouw publieke foto's en je bio te bekijken zijn. Deze 'service' zal de komende week worden uitgerold voor alle gebruikers. Door alle content en profielen online publiek te gooien, wordt het eenvoudiger om andere gebruikers te vinden en hun content te bekijken. Afbeeldingen toevoegen van op je computer is niet mogelijk.

Wil je niet dat je foto's voor iedereen te bekijken zijn, ga dan naar je settings en vink de optie 'Photos are private' aan. 

Door alle profielen publiek te zetten, sneuvelt er opnieuw een stukje online privacy. Of toch een stukje van de online privacy-illusie.

Hiermee eigent Instagr.am zich een plaats toe in het rijtje van de grote social netwerksites. Uiteraard zal Facebook er alles aan doen om die plaats mee af te dwingen. Benieuwd of Twitter nu extra vaart zal zetten achter de implementatie van foto-filters?

(Door: Jef De Busser)  

[actwittyblog-blog]

Categorization of Services Into Topics

Online public profiles of people are looked for knowing them better and making interactions more worthy in real world. Its very important to create that right impression. Problem with existing online profiles is that they are scattered and cater to specific audience.

There are few steps needed to gain maximum potential from your efforts on Internet. Few things which are needed in social media

Aggregate all your public profiles.

Dynamic Profiles beat Static Profiles.

Reputation "Always" backed by data.

Aggregate all your public profiles You may be an enthusiast creating technology and business vibes by micro-blogging on services like Twitter and Tumblr. At the same time you may have aspects of being a Hollywood fan from Facebook. Its important to integrate profiles.

Dynamic Profiles beat Static Profiles We create public profiles and fill in our details but in majority cases such public profiles go stale. They reflect education, work, interests which are manually added. There is a lot more which can be extracted from data we share. Like when I say "Roger Fedrer is one of the finest Tennis player" definitely means I am a Roger Fedrer fan. This must be associated with me.

Reputation "Always" backed by data We need to highlight what are our interest/expertise domain. And this is not just by showing some influence score number, everything has to be backed by your data. If you are seen as a techie, what in your data from Twitter or Facebook give you that reputation.

Actwitty as its USP offers all 3 with a zero effort from user and quick navigation to data.

Above profile highlights how an individual has spread his Internet engagement across 2 services Facebook and Twitter. Technology and Entertainment are his dominant topics.

Actwitty allows users to activate multiple services to be aggregated.

Actwitty at its core pulls user data from social network sites, its semantic engine processes the data for various things like

Topic of discussion (Technology, Entertainment, Health, Business etc.)

Key terms mentioned in the shared data

Data shared has video, image, blog link etc.

Extracts topical distribution across services.

Actwitty then creates a user impression as shown above which highlights the way user shares his data on his social networking platform.

Above profile shows how we can see number of links, videos, key term mentions are made by the user.A click on videos, links, images shows the data on the Feeds section.

At all times Actwitty keeps the data privacy honoured. For instance, a post which has been shared to "Only" friends in Facebook will be restricted to be seen only by "Friends of the user" from Facebook.

[actwittyblog-blog]

Why to start with Twitter + Facebook ?

Actwitty has spiralled through various ideas with one primary focus being organise user's impression for others to see. We have chosen the services judiciously which gives the maximum benefit to the users.

Facebook, Twitter are social network, micro-blogging platforms respectively. A lot of data is originated on these two services and lots of traffic is driven to blogs via a link exchange on Facebook or Twitter. This means majority of bloggers do share their links on Facebook and Twitter.

A huge user base to target, amount of data which can be tapped on twitter and Facebook, a variety of user base and last but not the least the denseness of network by gaining access to friends and followers through viral propagation.

Actwitty at all times wants user to have minimum behaviour disruption.