#LaTorreRrotal #Reto #Diversión
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Canada
#LaTorreRrotal #Reto #Diversión
Kay Nilsson at ¿Donde esta mi gente?
This is one of the "major findings" from a joint report of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). The report is called "Supporting and Caring For Our Latino LGBT Youth." The report represents a subset of the overall data HRC collected with regards to LGBT youth.
If you read the 36-page document, you will soon see a theme emerge: Latino communities bad, schools and peers pretty good. Although they never say it explicitly (likely because they know how they would be criticized), there is an implicit conclusion by the authors that TLGBQ Latin@s face their greatest challenges in the communities where they live. They then conclude that schools, especially as it relates to peer attitudes are actually quite positive. Additionally, when they report responses about schools and peers, they compare TLGBQ Latin@s to non-TLGBQ Latin@s and TLGBQ people of other races, especially white and black TLGBQ youth. The impression you are left with is that all of these youth are located in similar school environments, namely a multiracial learning environment. Therefore we are left to understand that TLGBQ Latin@s are better off in a multiracial environment (read as "less Latin@") and not in a majority or totally Latin@ community/neighborhood.
The reality however, as most people know (it doesn't take a PhD to know this), schooling environments are incredibly racially segregated. Although I cannot say with 100% certainty about the specific TLGBQ Latin@ youth surveyed, given the prevalence of segregated schools in American education, it is safe to assume that many, if not the overwhelming majority of TLGBQ Latin@ youth surveyed attend majority or totally Latin@ schools. This is an incredibly important detail, because the language the authors of the report use make it look like TLGBQ Latin@ youth are unsafe amongst their own racial/ethnic community. In reality, the more accurate story to be told, is that it is a difference that is largely predicated on generational difference. Schools may be better relative to the neighborhoods where the youth live because schools are filled with young people and we know that young people are more affirming (or at least tolerant) of gender and sexual diversity when compared to older generations.
Lastly, and most profoundly, the report never engages a conversation of racism and white supremacy. The report, and the questionnaire it is based upon, do not consider the racialized experience of TLGBQ Latin@ youth. They reduce their analysis to simple considerations of sexual and kinda-sorta gender identities. We have no way of knowing how the responses of these TLGBQ Latin@ youth are also informed by the racism and xenophobia they encounter around them. I'm sure this report was written with the best of intentions, but at the end of the day it reproduces inaccurate information and a denial of the full human experience TLGBQ Latin@ youth are having.
I need to follow more blogs.
Like this if you'd like me to follow your blog. But before you like, see if you meet the requirements.
Non-white unless you're a white person that has their shit together.
Don't be one of those heterosexuals.
Don't say problematic shit.
oh and follow me lol
There's other things but yeah I can't think of them right now Post-posting of this post additions:
Don't be one of those vegans. that are rude as fuck about eating meat.
don't be one of those animals rights fools.
Queer Latin@s at UC Berkeley
What is safety?
In popular or mainstream conversations about safety from violence/harm, safety often gets defined as the lack or absence of an immediate threat. The problem with such an idea about safety is that it assumes that threats against safety are primarily understood as interpersonal (between individuals). It keeps invisible not only institutional expressions of violence,harm, and aggression; but maybe more importantly denies the everydayness of racism, misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, xenophobia, ableism, and class exploitation. The denial of the complete and consuming presence of various systems of power and subordination, then creates the false expectation that people should feel safe and secure as long as a person or people are not in their face with explicit threats of violence/harm.
I have so far interviewed in total 17 TLGBQ Latin@s in Texas and New York City. One thing that is abundantly clear, is that the overwhelming majority of folks I have talked with either explicitly or implicitly reject this idea. Safety therefore, is a much deeper and more radical idea than what is commonly accepted. For the TLGBQ Latin@s I have talked with, safety is nothing short of a space that is fully accepting, nurturing, and affirming. A place where one's full and complex humanity is a given and never ever in question. Safety cannot be a place where there is just a lack or absence of threats of violence/harm. Safety is beyond and more than common calls for "tolerance" of difference. Finally, safety cannot exist in spaces where some rights/protections are temporarily, sometimes, or provisionally given/granted/guaranteed.
We need more visions of so-called social justice that incorporate the kind of safety the participants of this project are giving voice to!
**On a personal note, I want to thank these individuals for sharing with me their visions of safety. I am grateful for your insights and words.**