As a nation our politics is imposing sacrifices and withholding solidarity.
Christophe Ringer in Religion Dispatches. To Get Thrugh This Time We'll Have to Shred the 'Racial Contract' and Choose Solidarity Over Sacrifice
seen from Germany
seen from South Korea
seen from China
seen from Yemen
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Argentina
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
As a nation our politics is imposing sacrifices and withholding solidarity.
Christophe Ringer in Religion Dispatches. To Get Thrugh This Time We'll Have to Shred the 'Racial Contract' and Choose Solidarity Over Sacrifice
The 'Racial Contract,' then, is intended as a conceptual bridge between two areas now largely segregated from each other: on the one hand, the world of mainstream (i.e., white) ethics and political philosophy, preoccupied with discussions of justice and rights in the abstract, on the other hand, the world of Native American, African American, and Third and Fourth World political thought, historically focused on issues of conquest, imperialism, colonialism, white settlement, land rights, race and racism, slavery, jim crow, reparations, apartheid, cultural authenticity, national identity, indigenismo, Afrocentrism, etc. These issues hardly appear in mainstream political philosophy, but they have been central to the political struggles of the majority of the world's population. Their absence from what is considered serious philosophy is a reflection not of their lack of seriousness but of the color of the vast majority of Western academic philosophers (and perhaps their lack of seriousness).
Charles Mills, The Racial Contract
In this very special episode, John talks with Charles W. Mills (Philosophy, The Graduate Center, CUNY) about his new book, Black Rights/White Wrong: The Critique of Racial Liberalism (Oxford UP, 2017). Mills walks us through some of the main arguments and concepts from the book, including the terminology of racial liberalism, the importance of white supremacy as a concept, his critiques of Kant and Rawls, the prospects for a “black radical liberalism,” and much more. But, the two build out the conversation to also discuss whiteness in the academy, race and ontology, the ongoing importance of historical materialism, whether liberalism can be reconstructed, and race and pedagogy in the political philosophy/theory classroom.
We were thrilled to have the opportunity to speak with Mills – don’t miss out on the dialogue.
New podcast! I got to interview Charles Mills.
The pandemic has exposed the bitter terms of our racial contract, which deems certain lives of greater value than others.
“The racial contract is not partisan—it guides staunch conservatives and sensitive liberals alike—but it works most effectively when it remains imperceptible to its beneficiaries. As long as it is invisible, members of society can proceed as though the provisions of the social contract apply equally to everyone. But when an injustice pushes the racial contract into the open, it forces people to choose whether to embrace, contest, or deny its existence.”
—Adam Serwer
The pandemic has exposed the bitter terms of our racial contract, which deems certain lives of greater value than others.
The underlying assumptions of white innocence and black guilt are all part off the “racial contract.”
The pandemic has exposed the bitter terms of our racial contract, which deems certain lives of greater value than others.
A portion of a lecture by Charles Mills on many of the themes of his book.
Mill's insistence upon the social contract as in fact a racial contract also does other work here- it transforms the singularity of rationality at the center if the western episteme, and as a consequence redefines racism as a very rational act.
The Erotic Life of Racism, Sharon P. Holland (37)