did you know? that they are exes. it's true norman told me so

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Serbia
seen from Sweden
seen from Venezuela
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Venezuela

seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
did you know? that they are exes. it's true norman told me so
The Wire thoughts: S1E01 "The Target"
-God, it really is so good right from the beginning. Just throws you right in.
-This show really is all about snitching, isn’t it? Literally the first scene is McNulty convincing Snotboogie’s friend to snitch. And basically the second scene is William Gant and the security guard snitching and not snitching, respectively.
-AND McNulty talking to Phelan is another form of snitching, isnt it? He airs his org's dirty laundry with an authority figure outside his chain of command. And gets his higher-ups in trouble.
-Half-baked thought: David Simon has said The Wire is ultimately about systems and people’s inability to break out of them. Snitching is so important because it’s a way of trying to break out of the particular system you’re stuck in. By snitching to Phelan, McNulty shows us from the beginning that he is willing to break the rules of his system, but also that he does not recognize the dangers and consequences of doing so.
Lots more misc thoughts and a few screencaps under the cut.
Shut up everyone, reporting to you live from Leon’s AKA same place Rawls was gay at in seminal post modern masterpiece The Wire
Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue; likewise laws and institutions no matter how efficient and well-arranged must be reformed or abolished if they are unjust.
- John Rawls, “A Theory of Justice” (1971)
Rawls in Illinois
«Entre los rasgos esenciales de esta situación, está el de que nadie sabe cuál es su lugar en la sociedad, su posición, clase o status social; nadie sabe tampoco cuál es su suerte en la distribución de ventajas y capacidades naturales, su inteligencia, su fortaleza, etc. Supondré, incluso, que los propios miembros del grupo no conocen sus concepciones acerca del bien, ni sus tendencias psicológicas especiales. Los principios de la justicia se escogen tras un velo de ignorancia. Esto asegura que los resultados del azar natural o de las contingencias de las circunstancias sociales no darán a nadie ventajas ni desventajas al escoger los principios. Dado que todos están situados de manera semejante y que ninguno es capaz de delinear principios que favorezcan su condición particular, los principios de la justicia serán el resultado de un acuerdo o de un convenio justo, pues dadas las circunstancias de la posición original y la simetría de las relaciones entre las partes, esta situación inicial es equitativa entre las personas en tanto que seres morales, esto es, en tanto que seres racionales con sus propios fines, a quienes supondré capaces de un sentido de la justicia».
John Rawls: Teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica, pág. 25. México, 1995.
TGO
@bocadosdefilosofia
@dies-irae-1