We live in an age of numbers. There is, sadly, no getting around it. Bureaucratic democracy excels at collecting numbers. Without them there is no measurement, no way to identify problems that don’t exist, and no way to demonstrate that current methods are not solving said problems.
These days, we live in an age of Really Big Numbers: billions, trillions, and, for nostalgia, millions. Most of the Press just reports these numbers as words, relying on a general sense that some how m<b<tr.
This is really quite dishonest. In elementary math, I was taught that you should use the lowest common denominator to compare fractions. We should do the same thing with Really Big Numbers (hat tip to XKCD for this idea).
Thus, in my posts I will try to avoid printing things like “The Congress has promised to make $10 billion in cuts to the $3.4 trillion federal budget over the next ten years,” without also printing something like “The Congress has promised to cut $10 billion over ten years of an annual budget of $3,450 billion.” If I really want to scare you, I may write something like: “The Congress has promised to cut $1 billion a year from a cumulative ten-year budget of $34,500 billion.”
*I cheated. This is a re-posting of a page called "On Numbers" under "Notions." I wanted to have a first post for the tag "Really Big Numbers."