seen from Ukraine
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
"To no one's surprise, modern Christian apologists, armed with stacks of diplomas from Bible colleges, have ginned up books and blogs by the hundreds to validate the conflicting, nonsensical New Testament stories.
The very fact that Bible stories require a small army of trained apologists to Jesusplain the contradictions is prima facie evidence the stories are fabrications."
-- Robert Conner
The Three Laws of Creationist Apologetics The First Law Faith in Creation can never be destroyed. In a closed mind, the level of ignorance must always remain equal. The Second Law Creationists will always conflate separate scientific fields of study. As a result, all conversations tend towards entropy. The Third Law In any conversation, the replies that are simply links to "scientiif" creationist articles, tends towards constant, as the understanding of those articles approaches absolute zero.
Shou-... should we tell them, or...?
"Apologists defend their Jesus as ineffectually as the disciples did in Gethsemane, wielding the paper swords of special pleading and question begging.
They pretend to be objective scholars but are in fact spin doctors for an institution in which they have far too much invested to ever seriously reconsider the issues."
-- Robert M. Price
Accurate.
They don’t know what “evidence” is, because they didn’t use it to come to their beliefs in the first place.
If your god was the source of objective morality, its morality would be obvious and unquestionable. No one could doubt it or question it.
More importantly, it wouldn’t need you using your morality to try and justify its morality.
