Creationism: Isn't it impossibly convenient that the physical properties of the Earth just happen to be so perfectly suited to the existence of human life?
The Anthropic Principle:
#iwtv#interview with the vampire#amc tvl#sam reid#jacob anderson
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from Spain
seen from France

seen from France
seen from Poland

seen from Italy

seen from Italy

seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from Italy
seen from China

seen from Italy
seen from Italy
seen from Russia
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Finland
Creationism: Isn't it impossibly convenient that the physical properties of the Earth just happen to be so perfectly suited to the existence of human life?
The Anthropic Principle:
I just went to YouTube to try and search for "evidence against creationism." Halfway through the word "again," the site suggested "evidence against evolution."
When I searched for "evidence against creationism," let's just say the results were disappointing. Here's a list of the first fifteen videos that came up:
What’s the evidence for a 6,000 year old Earth? (pro-creationism)
The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists Part 1: Cosmology/Planetary Science (anti-creationism)
Shortest Scientist vs Creationist debate ever. (stance unclear)
"Creation Scientist Shocks Joe Rogan with Mind-Blowing Evidence Against Evolution!" (presented as pro-creationism)
Why Evolution Is FALSE (pro-creationism)
SIX Biological Evidences for Creation - Pt.1 (pro-creationism)
Richard Dawkins: One Fact to Refute Creationism (anti-creationism)
Creationist Stumps Evolutionary Professors with ONE Question! (pro-creationism)
7 Scientific Reasons why Darwinian Evolution is a Myth (pro-creationism)
Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism In Less Than 15 Minutes (BRILLIANT!) (clickbait title, video is of a theistic scientist talking about his beliefs)
6 Reasons Not to Believe in Evolution | Proof for God
How old is the Earth --- 6,000 years or 4.5 billion? (anti-young earth creationism, though the creator claims Egyptian mummies are 200,000 years old, so...)
Evolutionary Biologist Reacts to Young Earth Creationist Arguments (anti-creationism)
This Is the Absolute BEST Evidence for Biblical Creation | Ken Ham (pro-creationism)
We Challenge All Evolutionists to Watch This Video! (pro-creationism)
So out of the first fifteen results for "evidence against creationism," only two of them have any actual relevance. Nine of the videos are straight up antiscience propaganda pushing young earth creationist pseudoscience.
The trend continued to hold after this, with some relevant videos here and there but most of the content promoting young earth creationism.
This is bad. Very bad. The purpose of young earth creationism is to turn people into Christofascists and to deny the reality of anthropogenic climate change.
So what do we do?
We make noise.
We make a conscious effort to create and promote more pro-science content and educate people against this chicanery. We intensify any and all activism against Christofascist BS. We get up and kick this BS in the ass, that's what we do.
So, uh. Does the church have an explanation for the existence of dinosaurs? Or is it "the devil planted these bones to make us believe in science?"
I don't know, but the majority of catholics in Belgium do believe in evolution. So it depends who you're asking
Scientific FACT, the Bible has verifiable scientific validity...
These are all verified in recent scientific papers:
Adam and Eve are the progenitors of all humans alive today.
No buried fossil with aDNA can be 10's of millions of years old.
Flood palo-hydrology is geologic fact, Noah's flood was real.
the Universe is not growing or expanding, God finished that work on day 6.
Evolution is human imagination, proof is in the Genomes.
Disagree let us debate the scientific papers, join me here : tumblr.com/join/iD-ZZf95
""It's not a core creation gospel issue." We live in the Garden of Eden, motherfuckers. Look around you. We have everything we could ever want. This planet is perfect and you are watching it burn in front of your fucking eyes. I don't give a shit if you believe there was something better before this. But this is God's creation. You look up at all those fucking stars, and you think that each one of those is a planet, and we're the only one that has his creation on it, And you don't give a shit about saving this? You're okay watching the fucking oceans turn black and the rivers run to fucking mud, and you're going to sit there and say, "This isn't my fucking problem." Give me a fucking break."
— Milo Rossi "The Website that Denies Reality"
I had a realization tonight that really hit me.
Atheists often argue for evolution, and creationists argue for the Bible —but the difference between them isn’t just about belief, it’s about storytelling. Evolution talks about humanity like an observer behind glass: “Our ancestors did this, our species evolved that way, we learned to survive.” It’s distant, almost clinical. It explains the mechanics of life, but not the heart of it.
The Bible, though — it breathes. It speaks like someone who knows us. It doesn’t just say, “Humans form social bonds.” It shows us Jesus wept. It tells of love, betrayal, redemption—how individual choices ripple out and affect others. It’s not a data set. It’s a living story.
Even when science tries to trace back our behavior — like saying yawning helps us bond or that males evolved to compete for mates—it still feels hollow. There’s no “true story” there, just a collection of detached facts about what we do, not who we are. “Survival of the fittest” might explain violence, but it can’t explain mercy. It can’t explain why we cry for others or why sacrifice moves us so deeply.
And when people try to apply those biological “truths” to morality — like claiming that men are naturally stronger, therefore women should submit — it warps everything further. That’s not divine design; that’s sin twisting what God made good. The curse in Genesis wasn’t permission for domination — it was a warning about brokenness. Yet so many have mistaken one for the other.
Evolution describes life as a loop: live, reproduce, die, repeat. The Bible describes life as a journey: fall, struggle, redeem, worship, hope. One tells of instincts; the other tells of souls.
We’ve lost sight of meaning because we’ve traded revelation for observation. We’re trying to understand sin through mud-streaked lenses — studying the dirt and calling it the whole story. But Scripture lifts our chin higher. Beneath even the long lists of names and “begots,” there’s heartache, devotion, and the relentless hand of God weaving redemption through it all.
Maybe that’s the difference. Evolution looks at humanity. The Bible looks into it.