The new "sharing" economy is really about sharing the scraps.
I am glad to see Robert Reich comment on one of the mysterious, potential futures we might find in walking paths ahead from the current state of plutocratic capitalism we live in. We have very short attention spans. We have our hands full enough with problems in the present, so that we forget what happened yesterday, and we find it difficult to look forward and build society constructively.
In the microview, many of us are satisfied with the extended opportunities made available by infrastructure laid down by tech companies. But we shouldn't forget why we found ourselves in this position in the first place. As Robert Reich explains, if the traditional job market really offered what it should, being an Uber driver or a Taskrabbit wouldn't really be all that attractive to many people. In other words, it's likely that you only drive for Lyft or whatever because you can't find a job that is worth keeping. A lot of jobs disappeared from our economy and aren't coming back. Part-time jobs with no benefits and stagnated wages that people can't quite live off of very well have replaced them, as well as service work enabled by tech, which is a welcome relief in the face of alternatives. A lot of those jobs had become somewhat miserable in the first place because of American workplace culture, but that's another story.
In the macroview, the growth of this "sharing" economy could mean, in combination with other factors, a part of an economic transformation that most of us wouldn't welcome. As AI develops and bots can be used to automate certain kinds of work, that leaves a lot less work to do in an economy that unrealistically expects everyone to work. (A fully employed society is already impossible, so think about that next time you see a homeless beggar and you feel like telling him to "get a job".) This dystopian future is one where you have less freedom over your work, because you acquire the work as neatly-packaged tasks. You perform your tasks, perhaps as part of a more complete project which is pieced out, partially to you and partially to bots, for maximum cost-effectiveness. When what you do can be simplified enough--when there are few enough variables that a bot can take it on, then perhaps you will need to move on to another sort of task. Or maybe not. Perhaps you will be an owner of capital, or an engineer of turking systems.
It may seem ridiculous to some that I suggest sci-fi futures be taken seriously. To others, it might seem alarmist for me to reflect in writing on tomorrow's bad news. I would accuse all those people of lacking clear sight. we are living in yesterday's sci-fi future. Every week a handful of important scientific breakthroughs or discoveries is made. We live in a present where wealth inequality is a grim, life or death reality. The notion that a non-moral approach to economics is the key to greater things prevails. People are commodified. Democracy is dysfunctional; plutocracy is principal. Where do we go, from here?











