tyrantchimera replied to your post: tyrantchimera replied to...
no no no I get this and I’m trying to understand this too. It’s interesting. I think just sticking with the “I don’t like people saying my pride and joy/my OC is about them when it was actually about me” idea is what we as artists have, and why the ‘kin’ tagging can be uncomfortable. Because it feels like art/idea theft on a level that we didn’t even know could occur. It’s like they’re taking the very CONCEPT of something that you toiled with, and saying that it was them
“feels like art/idea theft on a level that we didn’t even know could occur” <----i think that pretty much nails the reason for artist discomfort. I don’t want to say “art theft”, really, since to me art theft is when you say you drew something when you actually didn’t (but idea theft? maybe??? i’m hesitant to say that’s what’s actually happening, but artists perceiving it as the case -> i can’t really fault them for that either)
From my understanding (again, not kin so I’m not sure if I’m saying this right. welcoming corrections), some folks are confused because their intention isn’t to ‘take’ the concept or idea and they do understand that the artist owns the concept of the character; they just want to acknowledge that the concept is them for their own comfort/coping/etc.etc none of which is the artist’s business.
Now what I’m left wondering is, what’s true? On an admittedly arbitrary scale that’s heavily flawed and biased by my own views, I’d say that if it’s something from a big, well established franchise, it’s not idea theft since it’s just like fanfic/fanart in that regard (or even fanfic of fanfic or fanart of fanfic, or fanfic of fanart... you get the idea). But it... feels just a tad like idea theft if it’s from a nonestablished artist/author? Maybe the difference with that is that small-time artists don’t really view their own art as something that’s created for the sole purpose of public consumption. IDK i’m just starting to bs now don’t mind me.