Adding on to my previous posts, my research also lead me to an interesting collision between recycling and the housing authority. Based on the latest 2015 audit of the Department of Public Works’ Bureau of Environmental Services Refuse and Recycling Divisions, it is clear that low-income communities under the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh (HACP) have not been adequately recycling for decades. Much of this seems to be based on a lack of space prescribed for recycling by the HACP as well as a lack of education/enforcement. While the communities themselves do not face direct negative consequences, the City suffers financial consequences. When HACP communities do not recycle, the City’s landfill fees are increase, potential recycling sales revenue is lost, and the City does not receive State Grants for recycling performance. Instead, the costs are absorbed by city taxpayers and money that could have been used elsewhere is lost. It is unclear whether substantial changes have been made since the audit, but it is clear that economic, social, and physical issues surrounding housing, recycling, and sustainability are intertwined. Our project alone cannot single-handedly solve any of these issues, but by researching, understanding, and caring about these issues and the networks they are defined by, we can act responsibly as informed designers, policy influencers, and community members.