Since the early ages, it has been a universal stereotype that “jocks” are less successful in school than non-athlete peers. A recent study conducted by Dr. Mark Frederick and Dr. Will Barratt at Indiana State University proves the fallacy of that stereotype. The duo studied 7 intangible academic skills they felt allude to future success in the real world and job force: • Critical thinking • Self-awareness • Communication • Diversity • Citizenship • Relationships • Leadership The results revealed that student-athletes excel more than traditional students. Lou Spiotti Jr., Executive Director of Intercollegiate Athletics at RIT, proved similar results of student-athletes. “The student body averages about a 3.0 GPA. Student-athletes usually receive 2 higher quality points,” said Spiotti. In essence, are student-athletes better prepared for the job force? “[Athletics], teach you core characteristics companies look for that aren’t easily obtained if not on a team. Athletes are goal-oriented, held to higher standards, and have a desire to be successful,” said Jess Kramer, a member of the RIT women’s basketball team and the Student Athlete Advisory Committee. According to Spiotti, student-athletes are 100% more disciplined and they know how to get the job done. “Student-athletes are more goal-oriented and outwork others which make them more valuable in the job market,” said Spiotti. Student-athletes at RIT share similar thoughts. “One lesson I’ve learned being a student-athlete is time management. Once you learn this you are more valuable in your career,” said Kara Birrell, member of the RIT women’s basketball team. Where’s the proof? Spiotti is proof that these intangibles carry over later in life. “I was a three sport athlete in high school and a two sport athlete in college. I believe it had a powerful effect on my performance. I wouldn’t be where I am now without sports,” said Spiotti. So what? With uncertainty of job placement after graduation, student-athletes might have an edge over other students who are not involved in school activities. As research continues, time will tell whether the “jocks” or “nerds” prevail in the work force.