"...she loves freebies." (Suits Crew Member 2018)
'Sticky Fingers' is just a Case of Royal Protocol 🙄
MESSY makes matters worse with ROYAL protocol excuses! In her demented mind, Royal Protocol requires that Meghan Markle:
walk off every photoshoot with all the items she wore to prevent wardrobe assistants from re-selling the (touched by royalty) garments on ebay. (we know she re-sells the clothes on ebay & that she borrowed and returned garments while in the brf)
archive her attire. "A different source pushed back on the regal tale by telling us no one was ever told of this rule. “It’s a fib!” insisted our source."
"In 2024, journalist Vanessa Grigoriadis claimed on Andrew Gold’s “Heretics” podcast that the former royal took “a lot of stuff” after she “wore it in a very high-profile photo shoot.” What’s shocking about hearing these kinds of alleged stories is that somebody who is living in a $15 million plus mansion in Montecito, who’s just had $100 million deals, would care enough to take home some jewelry and clothes from a photoshoot that she can clearly afford,” Grigoriadis, a contributing writer at the New York Times Magazine and Vanity Fair, said on the podcast."
Wardrobe… miscommunication? A source tells Page Six that Meghan Markle allegedly walked away from a 2022 Variety cover shoot with a $1,695 green gown because it was all part of “archiving” her clothes as a royal. Others are crying fashion foul. Markle had viewers doing double takes over the weekend when a trailer for her show, “With Love, Meghan Holiday Celebration,” showed her in a dress allegedly kept from a 2022 Variety cover shoot. A fashion source tells Page Six that Markle, “took the dress from the shoot without asking,” confirming rumblings that the pricey one-shoulder, emerald green Galvan “Ushuaia” gown had disappeared from the photo shoot. A second source confirmed to Page Six that Markle ended up with the dress. However, a third source told us that everyone’s getting their knickers in a twist over nada, claiming that Markle must take the clothes as a royal — and that the whole hubbub is likely “a misunderstanding.” A spokesperson for the Sussexes commented after our piece published: “The insinuation that any items were taken without the full knowledge and agreement of the on-set stylists or their respective teams” was “categorically false.” The rep also told us that, “Any items kept, were done so in total transparency and in accordance with contractual arrangements.”
Aquazzara Shoe Thief
Ugly in Chanel with & without shoes
