@thebakingbarbarian I FINALLY REMEMBERED A STORY OF ME DOING MALICIOUS COMPLIANCE.
This was not for activist purposes. I was just being a menace to one of my high school teachers (that I actually liked) because he had a sense of humor, and I knew he'd think it was funny and not actually be annoyed by it.
I was in astronomy class, and we had been instructed to find a "good source" on some astronomy topic and present it to the class. At the time, I was also attending an advanced science high school in the morning, and we had a free subscription to a research paper database. I had an abusive amount of homework all the time at that point, so I asked my astronomy teacher if I could pick an article from the database (to speed up the process for me). He goes "Well that kind of defeats the point of evaluating the source to see if it's good since everything in there is peer-reviewed."
And I said: "Exactly." (and with that, he understood my meaning to be "If I'm looking for a good source, would a smart move not be to go to where I know there are good sources?")
He approved my request, and then told us that we needed to send him a PDF of the article we were doing for him to approve before we started our power points.
I went into the database, and I was just looking for something interesting when I found a paper by a bunch of (Russian?) scientists swearing to god that they had found life on Venus, both plant and animal.
Dear reader, I would like to show you "the animal":
Anyway, I downloaded the PDF and sent it to him since all the sources in that database are good because they're peer-reviewed, and all of a sudden I just hear him yell "[insert my name], get me the DOI of this paper. I do not believe you found this in the database." I obliged, and a week later, I gave a presentation on how there may be scorpions on Venus while he shook his head, and screamed (while trying not to break down laughing) that there are no scorpions on Venus between each slide.
Updating this with the DOI of the original article because people are interested, and I somehow still have it: DOI: 10.1134/S1028335813120057
P.S. There are no Google-able full text access links to the article, but if you put the DOI in SciHub, you can get it after passing a recaptcha test (the instructions are in Russian, but the recaptcha is in English, so just type the symbols and hit enter).














