The Hale fire happened six years before the start of TW, and as we all know, the trauma of being burned alive so affected Peter Hale, he simply can not be held accountable for any of his actions in...
@bigskydreaming I... don’t understand what this is saying?
First off, and I said this yesterday too, y’all invent so many situations for non-Scott Fandom that I’m not even sure if you know what’s real anymore.
I don’t get the timing thing, because the show was six seasons, but the time in Beacon Hills that passed was less than 3 years (a little more depending on what kind of timejump you think happened in the finale since it’s never said).
But what does Peter’s six years of trauma have to do with Scott? And I’d also like to point out that Peter showing Scott MERE SECONDS of his pain does not equate to Scott a) understanding the depth of what Peter went through or b) experiencing it himself. That’s a ridiculous argument and one y’all need to put to bed.
Just because I’ve watched Handmaid’s Tale doesn’t mean I get what it’s like to be sexually assaulted and raped and it would be INSULTING and gross for me to claim that.
Additionally, Peter’s trauma adds context to his actions, but it doesn’t excuse them, it never has. He killed Laura for goodness sakes, not one Steter or Peter fan has glossed over that and to imply that even a majority of them do is again condescending and insulting.
I get y’all like to get hard for Scott and get the SJW kudos for supporting the lightest skinned half Mexican you could find, but maybe use actual facts and stop making up nonsense to attack others with?
